Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 50 Next >>
Topic: Amazing Spider-Man now with spoilers (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Jay Matthews
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 11 October 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 2468
Posted: 25 November 2005 at 6:40pm | IP Logged | 1  

But you could flip that criticism around, Mike.  Don't get me wrong, I'm a'gin all this excessively graphic depictions of violence, but at least Morlun is the bad guy doing a bad thing.  In some ways, it's better than a portrayed hero doing a bad thing.

Edited by Jay Matthews on 25 November 2005 at 6:40pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Joe Zhang
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 12857
Posted: 25 November 2005 at 6:44pm | IP Logged | 2  

In my town BOTD is not sold on the book-store racks (where children are most likely to find comics nowdays).  Amazing Spider-Man is. 
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Ronald Pegram
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 08 June 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 862
Posted: 25 November 2005 at 7:00pm | IP Logged | 3  

Joe,

That's not the case in my town. In any case, any comic featuring Batman, Superman and Wonder Woman is no more a horror comic than was the Champions because Ghost Rider was a member.

The whole Spider-man eye sequence is in bad taste, in my opinion, but I can't see the furor when most of us love BOTD (including me). It's either ok to have a character eat the flesh of another character in a comic with all-ages characters or it aint.


Back to Top profile | search
 
James Wright
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 1062
Posted: 25 November 2005 at 7:09pm | IP Logged | 4  

Or it's okay for the Demon to do it to a victim, but not a lame villain to do it to Spider-Man...

Edited by James Wright on 25 November 2005 at 7:20pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Thomas Mets
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 05 September 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 898
Posted: 25 November 2005 at 7:21pm | IP Logged | 5  

Stan Lee still works for Marvel. It's his job to help sell the books.
********************************************************** ***********
If Stan Lee had said that he's rather not write the introduction for a book, I'm pretty sure the bosses at Marvel would have agreed. This is a guy whose lawsuit against Marvel & decision to write for DC were covered in newspapers. From interviews I've also gotten the impression that he has a tremendous respect for the cinema medium (check out any interview where he's asked what it's like to see his characters on-screen), so I could believe that he was impressed by Millar's run on Marvel Knights Spider-Man, if only for its cinematic qualities.

Last time i checked, super heroes, battles, and spandex uniforms are, like, totally, unkewl, man, like, ewwwww.
********************************************************** **********************
Creators have been trying to tell superhero stories without the old cliches (costumes, a battle every issue) for a long time.

From Comics Creators on the Fantastic Four
Stan Lee: I tried to violate all the comic book cliches when I did Fantastic Four. I tried to not give them costumes or secret identities, or so forth. That’s about all I remember about the origin.



Is there any act of violence which would make you criticize the writer as going over a line?  In other words, when it comes to violence, do you have a line for Spider-Man?
******************************************************** *********************
A writer would go over the line if Spider-Man is sexually abused, and an artist would go over the line if he/she were to show organs being pulled out. I'd say pretty much any act of violence is acceptable as long as the reader doesn’t see it, and the writer has a solution for fixing the mess.



To Howard Mackie

I enjoyed your Hobgoblin story arc in Spider-Man 47 to 49.   You did a great job rebuilding the Macendale Hobgoblin, and introducing the Son of Kraven.
******************************************************** *************************
Spider-Man 46 (the beginning of the Hobgoblin arc) was actually the first Spider-Man issue I read, and I've now now spent god knows how much money on the books, been introduced to a lot of great stories (some by Mackie.) In addition one of my goals in life (note to others- I'm still in college) is to write Spider-Man one day.


There are several dozen other Marvel characters who are
well-suited for dark, grim and unpleasant stories, but
Spider-Man just isn't one of them.
******************************************************** ********************
I actually found Amazing Fantasy #15 to be pretty dark, and grim.
It’s available free at http://www.marvel.com/dotcomics/index.htm if anyone wants to check it out.


Apparently, M***** has decided it needs it's own 'rape' story as well (SPOILERS) Black Cat gets raped in the Kevin Smith mini (END SPOILERS).
******************************************************** *************************
It’s implied from a six-page preview, but nothing’s been compared yet. There’s a 10 or so percent chance you’re jumping the gun.


The rape story is not even original.  It was done first (involving Black Canary) by DC with THE LONGBOW HUNTERS back in 1987
******************************************************** **************
I recall a rape earlier in Kurosawa's Rashomon There were other rapes in the Old Testament, and Greek myth.


Now, some have attibuted that to JRjr no longer doing the art, and there may be some truth to that.  But, JRjr left before "Sins of the Past" and the drop in sales didn't occur until after that storyline.  Which means readers stuck around and didn't like what they got, not that they were just JRjr fans.
******************************************************** *********************
You sure the decline in sales isn't also a result of readers just switching to trades.

Would you rather they keep Spider-Man missing an eye?
My feeling is, if they have a good, plausible way of reversing it, then I'm cool with it.
******************************************************** *********************
Good man.
        


You see some huge difference in the two but the TRUTH is your arguments would only work IF BOTD didn't have Superman and Batman chilling in the comic. Once you introduce all-ages characters to BOTD, it's an all-ages book, if for no other issue than that one.
******************************************************** ********************
I think one of the important things to note about Blood of the Demon is that DC advertised Batman’s appearance on the cover. I have no problem with known all-ages characters appearing in mature rated books like  Marvel's Alias because that never advertised the appearances of those characters on covers.


Or it's okay for the Demon to do it to a victim, but not a lame villian to do it to Spider-Man...
******************************************************** *******************
Is it okay for a villain who you don’t think is lame to rip out Spider-Man’s eye?

Edited by Thomas Mets on 25 November 2005 at 7:26pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
James Wright
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 1062
Posted: 25 November 2005 at 7:25pm | IP Logged | 6  

Or it's okay for the Demon to do it to a victim, but not a lame villian to do it to Spider-Man...
******************************************************** *******************
Is it okay for a villain who you don’t think is lame to rip out Spider-Man’s eye?

===

Nope.  I prefer Spider-Man to have his eyes intact.  I'm funny that way.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Darren De Vouge
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 04 December 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 3586
Posted: 25 November 2005 at 7:26pm | IP Logged | 7  

The rape story is not even original.  It was done first (involving Black Canary) by DC with THE LONGBOW HUNTERS back in 1987
******************************************************** **************
I recall a rape earlier in Kurosawa's Rashomon There were other rapes in the Old Testament, and Greek myth.

**********************************

It's all about context.  I was speaking of popular comics.  Nobody likes a smarta**.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Mig Da Silva
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 900
Posted: 25 November 2005 at 7:29pm | IP Logged | 8  

I just want to laugh my ass off when in three months these guys are here trying to explain us Cap America with a strap-on :o)

In the meanwhile, let's enjoy Eye-Patch-Man. Hopefully Peter will get a parrot.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Darren De Vouge
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 04 December 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 3586
Posted: 25 November 2005 at 7:33pm | IP Logged | 9  

Why does Captain America need a strap-on?
Back to Top profile | search
 
James Wright
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 1062
Posted: 25 November 2005 at 7:36pm | IP Logged | 10  

Frost bite..
Back to Top profile | search
 
Mig Da Silva
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 900
Posted: 25 November 2005 at 7:43pm | IP Logged | 11  


 QUOTE:
People act as if Marvel is stubbornly clinging to things that are causing it to lose readers-the readers were lost awhile ago. However, Marvel still remains competive and usually beats DC-at least pre-Infinite Crisis.


It also hasn't created a single main hero in this decade.

It also hasn't created a single second tier hero in this decade.

It also never sold as little as in this decade.

Pseudo-Economics don't work here. Marvel is an entertainement company. One that doesn't give a rats ass about printed publishing. They don't need it to survive, even if it's profitable it's peanuts compared to the movie franchise (while it lasts). And, apparently, nobody gives a crap about artistic integrity.

So basically they have this guy who runs the printing part of the company, he has no experience, he was no legend or had the experience even as a penciller, and he runs the joint like a frat house, and has his buds write 4 to 5 books and showers the with all the aids he can: alternate covers, pornographic hype, reboots, and shock kill-sodomize-ressuscitate gimmicks.

Continuity doesn't exist, nothing makes sense, decades of legacy get thrown in the trash for an efemerate moment of shock.

Saying this ain't all that bad kinda sounds like the guy who threw himself of a building and passed by the 8th floor and was still alive, passed through the 5th floor and said "hey, this ain't all that bad", passed through the 2nd floor and smile confidently.

Then hit the ground in a bloody pulp.

Edited by Mig Da Silva on 25 November 2005 at 7:44pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Mig Da Silva
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 900
Posted: 25 November 2005 at 7:50pm | IP Logged | 12  


 QUOTE:
Why does Captain America need a strap-on?


He will when Batroc bites off his family jewels.

But ya see... people are already interested! Now this is riveting storytelling. People immideately want to now what it's all about!

Who took a bite out of whom - That's the future of comics.
Back to Top profile | search
 

<< Prev Page of 50 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login