Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 28 Next >>
Topic: "Growth and Change" (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Alex Violette
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 06 January 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 20
Posted: 09 November 2005 at 5:18pm | IP Logged | 1  

I am in class right now so I cant type out a full response, but under my definition post crisis wonder woman is definatly one, so is black canary, the others might be just considered total reboots, but with E2 superman aka the golden age version walking around in Infinite Crisis I think Superman could also fit the definition of a legacy.
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Joe Zhang
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 12857
Posted: 09 November 2005 at 6:05pm | IP Logged | 2  

BTW when I mentioned "GJ trolls" I did not mean to lump in Alex at all. He's cool. 
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
David Blot
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 22 August 2005
Location: France
Posts: 858
Posted: 09 November 2005 at 6:41pm | IP Logged | 3  

Can I come into this debate, gentlemen and make references to european
comic books.

Actually what I found so fascinating in the US comic books compared to
european ones, is the notion of continuity inter stories and characters.

Now, if you say continuity you obviously (?) means a timeline, and from
that some obvious sense of growths especially if the characters were set
up in a precise timeline 'start area' (ie : WWII for the Ben & Reed, the 60's
asian war for Iron Man etc...).

Now in most european comic books, there is no continuity. The character
is defined but grow very very subtly, and not by age, just by situation if a
new supporting character is introducing in the continuity for example.
They have one job, they stick to the job. They are single, they're never will
be married, etc... They're teens, they stay teens, etc...

For example, for those who know, europe best seller like TINTIN or
ASTERIX are totally based on this. The cast of Tintin was build by the
years, and indeed, Tintin is not the same in his first 1928 adventure then
in his last 1976 one, but so was also Herge, the author who did all by
himself. That in US situations can compared to Archie, or more to the
point, maybe, the Disney stories of Barks and co. And most DC books
before the mid 70's.

Now you also have characters like BLUEBERRY (the western by Moebius) or
CORTO MALTESE (by italian guy Hugo Pratt). Indeed, the character has a
define sense of growth, the difference is as soon as they appeared to be
popular, the authors of both creation knew when the character was born
AND dead, and from that both points they are telling you their whole life.

There is three (or maybe four I dont remember) series of BLUEBERRY
coressponding to different age line, a bit like Young Indiana Jones and co.
We know Corto Maltese was the childhood friend of Jack London, and the
arch enemy of russian intriguant Rastpoutin, so do the math.

All this to give you some different angles of way of doing it, and telling
you that you're way doing (continuity and growth) it is pretty unique in
comic books in the world. And that's what I love about it.

At the end, I truly think DC & MArvel, should launch a 'non continuity' line
with great stories (and not adult ones) with BATMAN, SPIDER-MAN, HULK
and all the major characters. You can do this and still have the continuity
one (since day one) universe. If you just have the last one, this will die
with us.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Jim O'Neill
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 April 2005
Posts: 336
Posted: 09 November 2005 at 8:59pm | IP Logged | 4  

"...but with E2 superman aka the golden age version walking around in Infinite Crisis I think Superman could also fit the definition of a legacy."

                            ***********************************

Alex, the problem I see here is that E-2 Superman started out as E-1 Superman.

IIRC, once the Powers that Were created Earth-2, they needed an E-2 Superman.

Since the character had been running non stop since Action #1, they decided to "create" an E-2 Superman by going back to the beginnings of the strip and exploiting the differences~ thus, the E-2 Clark Kent worked at The Daily Star and his editor was George Taylor, just as it was when Siegel & Shuster were creating those early stories. That's why the E-2 Superman we see on the last page of IC #1 is sporting an earlier version of the 'S' shield, as well.

So the "original" Superman of E-2 didn't appear until Justice League #75 (where the two Supermen met for the first time), "created" well after his E-1 counterpart.

And I'll be damned if I know what the hell it means, or what I was originally getting at... oh yeah, I was trying to reinforce my idea that editorial stuff like this doesn't count as a "legacy" situation.

But then, you already knew we didn't agree... ;-)

 

Back to Top profile | search
 
Alex Violette
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 06 January 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 20
Posted: 09 November 2005 at 9:15pm | IP Logged | 5  

Okay to expand on what I was trying to say Wonder Woman and Black Canary had their respective mothers as their legacy connection. The other heroes (not including Barry and Hal) with the exception of currently E2 Superman and Superboy had what would have been their legacy connections erased from existence so that they would not be legacy heroes.

 

Crisis love it or hate it was saying characters like Green Arrow were the first of their kind in the DCU and it was always thus, so that they are eliminated that legacy, and a complete reboot of the characters. They were similar to your Doom Patrol as I understand it, not a legacy a reboot of their existence.

Does that answer your question? If not I can try and expound more on the matter.

Edited by Alex Violette on 09 November 2005 at 9:16pm
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
John Hays
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 18 October 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 20
Posted: 09 November 2005 at 10:18pm | IP Logged | 6  

"Alex, the problem I see here is that E-2 Superman started out as E-1 Superman.

IIRC, once the Powers that Were created Earth-2, they needed an E-2 Superman.

Since the character had been running non stop since Action #1, they decided to "create" an E-2 Superman by going back to the beginnings of the strip and exploiting the differences~ thus, the E-2 Clark Kent worked at The Daily Star and his editor was George Taylor, just as it was when Siegel & Shuster were creating those early stories. That's why the E-2 Superman we see on the last page of IC #1 is sporting an earlier version of the 'S' shield, as well.

So the "original" Superman of E-2 didn't appear until Justice League #75 (where the two Supermen met for the first time), "created" well after his E-1 counterpart.

And I'll be damned if I know what the hell it means, or what I was originally getting at... oh yeah, I was trying to reinforce my idea that editorial stuff like this doesn't count as a "legacy" situation.

But then, you already knew we didn't agree... ;-)"


*******************

Excellent point.  The Earth 2 Superman concept was rather artificial, and the E1 and E2 versions really sprang from the same person.




Edited by John Hays on 09 November 2005 at 10:19pm
Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
James C. Taylor
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 4705
Posted: 10 November 2005 at 12:10am | IP Logged | 7  

The tin god Continuity trumps reality. *sigh*
Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Thanos Kollias
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 June 2004
Location: Greece
Posts: 5009
Posted: 10 November 2005 at 2:28am | IP Logged | 8  

Okay to expand on what I was trying to say Wonder Woman and Black Canary had their respective mothers as their legacy connection.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

I don't know if anything has changed, but ,post Crisis, Wonder Woman/Diana predates Wonder Woman/Hippolyta. The fact that WW/H's adventures take place in the past doesn't mean a thing and is a mere technicallity. Diana was the first Wonder Woman and Hippolyta replaced her daughter.

Unless, of course, something has changed after JB left the title that I am unaware of.

Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Rob Hewitt
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 11 May 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 10182
Posted: 10 November 2005 at 7:26am | IP Logged | 9  

BTW when I mentioned "GJ trolls" I did not mean to lump in Alex at all. He's cool. 

-****

My stupidity comes up again. I thought Alex was a girl for some reason. D'oh.

Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Joe Zhang
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 12857
Posted: 10 November 2005 at 7:30am | IP Logged | 10  

"Violette" is a somewhat feminie sounding last name. In fact it would be cool name for a female super-character (sounds close to "violence".) 
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Aaron Leach
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 364
Posted: 10 November 2005 at 8:21am | IP Logged | 11  

Well I see most people's disliking of what has happened in the aging of comic book heros. How do we fix it? This is a hypothetical question for JB, but others may chime in as well. Can it be fixed? 
Back to Top profile | search
 
John Hays
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 18 October 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 20
Posted: 10 November 2005 at 8:24am | IP Logged | 12  

I don't know if anything has changed, but ,post Crisis, Wonder Woman/Diana predates Wonder Woman/Hippolyta. The fact that WW/H's adventures take place in the past doesn't mean a thing and is a mere technicallity. Diana was the first Wonder Woman and Hippolyta replaced her daughter.

Unless, of course, something has changed after JB left the title that I am unaware of.

***************************

Valid point.  However, earlier I think someone mentioned the pre-Crisis examples of characters like Green Lantern existing on a separate Earth, and therefore not being legacy because of that, and only being retconned into legacy after Crisis, so are we going to say only pre-Crisis or only post-Crisis or both?

As far as Byrne's question earlier regarding Superman, Batman, WW, etc...I wouldn't call the big three legacy because their counterparts on Earth 2 were all the same people, Clark, Bruce, and Diana.  So they're more parallels than legacy.

I would also admit that, since Hal Jordan became a GL by joining up with a space police force that just happened to be called Green Lanterns, that does not necessarily link him to Alan Scott, and therefore if he's legacy of anyone it would be Abin Sur, so that could definitely be argued as not legacy. (even though in the real world, the silver age GL and Flash were written as the next generation of fans' versions of GL and Flash, coming after the golden age's versions)

However, I would have to say Barry Allen is definitely legacy because both pre and post Crisis, he grew up reading Flash comics, so that when he received his powers he chose to carry on that mantle, thus being a legacy character just as Wally is.

Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 

<< Prev Page of 28 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login