Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum
Topic: Fans contradicting stance on canon and retcons Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Rick Whiting
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 22 April 2004
Posts: 2305
Posted: 02 July 2026 at 3:52am | IP Logged | 1 post reply
One of the things that ticks me off about modern day comic fans (specifically adult readers who have been reading comics for years) and comic pros is that they are so quick to accept (and insist) that retcons made to Marvel and DC characters and their stories remain cannon, but they are oppose to making those same retcons non cannon even if they hated those retcons. They insist that a retcon should only be fixed/undone by giving an in story explanation instead of just retconning, ignoring, and never mentioning it again. It's insane and doesn't make any sense.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Brian Price
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 26 June 2012
Posts: 100
Posted: 02 July 2026 at 11:54am | IP Logged | 2 post reply
My thought is that it's more about resistance to change.  The newer readers encounter the retcons first and think that's the way the story should be.  Older readers first encountered the original version of the story and think that's the way it should be instead of the retcon that followed.  Neither of them want(ed) the story to change from the way they first encountered it.

To me it's similar to how younger people think the Jim Lee era is the best version of the X-Men, when it's obviously the Cockrum/Byrne/Cockrum/Smith era. ;-)
Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 136448
Posted: 02 July 2026 at 12:27pm | IP Logged | 3 post reply
The average lifespan of a fan/reader was thought to be around five years when I got into the Biz. “We lose them when they discover girls” was the mantra.

In that era, fans were less likely to notice “retcons”. When I read (fresh off the newsstand) the first appearance of Supergirl, it did not occur to me what a radical alteration of continuity she represented.

But as readers stuck around longer, they could not help but spot the changes.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Rick Whiting
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 22 April 2004
Posts: 2305
Posted: 02 July 2026 at 5:50pm | IP Logged | 4 post reply
Marvel and DC should just print a statement once a year in all of the books telling fans that what is or isn't cannon will be retconned from time to time without any in story explanation. They should also say that if you as a long time adult reader don't like it, then we are sorry and you should move onto other comics that are more suitable for and appealing to your adult tastes. Just make it clear from the jump that the Marvel and DC superhero comics are supposed to be timeless stories for all ages that present the illusion of change.
Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 136448
Posted: 02 July 2026 at 6:11pm | IP Logged | 5 post reply
While at DC I pitched a series called BATMAN AND ROBIN. It was intended to be an “entry level” book, simple and straightforward, targeting new readers—kids—who were not emersed in all the impenetrable stuff that, even post CRISIS, still clung to the characters.

I was told “We think of Batman as one of our adult books.”

Back to Top profile | search
 
Evan S. Kurtz
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 04 July 2022
Location: Canada
Posts: 370
Posted: 02 July 2026 at 8:30pm | IP Logged | 6 post reply
I have to admit I’m totally over the idea of worrying about what’s “canon” or not in comics. The persistent effort of companies trying to attract readers through “events,” “fresh starts,” “reboots,” “deaths,” “resurrections,” etc., has made modern comics impenetrable to me in terms of trying to keep straight whatever’s happened beforehand. Or maybe I’m just salty because I started reading at the beginning of the post-Crisis canon, and all they ever did since then was muddle stuff up to the point where none of the characters represent anything identifiable to anyone with any kind of invested interest.

Which isn’t to say I can’t or won’t enjoy a story. But these days, there’s nothing in a story that’s going to convince me that I need to read whatever happens next. 
Back to Top profile | search
 
Brian Miller
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 28 July 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 32082
Posted: 02 July 2026 at 10:34pm | IP Logged | 7 post reply
I was told “We think of Batman as one of our adult books.”
******
Thanks, Cousin Frank.
Back to Top profile | search
 

If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login
If you are not already registered you must first register

  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login