Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 12 Next >>
Topic: Roy Thomas co-created Wolverine…? Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Mark Haslett
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 6431
Posted: 03 April 2024 at 9:34pm | IP Logged | 1 post reply

Along with the conventional wisdom that publishers will "steal ideas" should come the hard truth: "just not YOURS."

Andy Olsen has himself exercised because he had the idea of naming a costumed hero, "Wolverine".

So many people are convinced they've been robbed because they just don't understand how any of this works.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Eric Jansen
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 27 October 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 2366
Posted: 03 April 2024 at 9:38pm | IP Logged | 2 post reply

People keep saying that Roy Thomas is making this grab only after everybody else involved is dead.  The Forbes article Peter Martin gives the link to above is an interesting read, including this account from Herb Trimpe:

Valada (Wein's widow) says Wein remained consistent in his account of the character’s creation since the beginning. While acknowledging that Thomas had assigned him to introduce a Canadian character named Wolverine in The Incredible Hulk, which Wein was writing, Wein said he did all the original research that shaped Wolverine’s powers and personality. Wein, who studied art in college, claimed he even contributed to John Romita’s character design.


This last point is disputed by Herb Trimpe, the artist who drew the first Wolverine stories, who died in 2015. In an interview that took place in 2012, Trimpe said:

“I was in the office a good part of the time and I was there when John [Romita] was working on the model for the character. The way it worked was Roy Thomas came up with a concept. It was his. He came up with the name of the character Wolverine and he handed it directly over to John Romita in the bullpen to develop a character sheet, which he gave to Len Wein who was the writer at the time.”


Trimpe continued, “I don’t want to take away anybody's ability to make a few bucks, but it was it Roy's concept and John's character design. The writer in my opinion gave the character a voice and actually collaborated with the artist in terms of bringing the character to life, which is no small thing, but it's not really the originator of the concept.”

Back to Top profile | search
 
Mark Haslett
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 6431
Posted: 03 April 2024 at 9:52pm | IP Logged | 3 post reply

Well, just because some guy was there when Roy gave the assignment to John Romita and worked with Len to draw Hulk 180-182, now we're expected to take the word of Herb Trimpe?

I'm glad this isn't something I have to decide because it just got complicated.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Robert Bradley
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 20 September 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 4883
Posted: 03 April 2024 at 10:18pm | IP Logged | 4 post reply

I Thomas was telling Romita "I want him to have (details of general appearance)" and then Romita went and drew the original character deisgn and then Wein went and added the details about being a Canadian government agent, etc.  I can see where all three accounts are true.  But if Thomas is just saying "Give a character named Wolverine and make him Canadian." All he really has is a concept.  It would be like me saying "Make me a car that runs on water and make it red." doesn't make me a part of the creative process.

I also don't think tacking on a dual identity and filling indetails about his history make you part of the character creation.  That makes you part of the process of serialized fiction.


Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Matt Hawes
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 16502
Posted: 03 April 2024 at 11:24pm | IP Logged | 5 post reply

If it was simply that Roy Thomas came up with the name, I wouldn't tend to give him credit in my own mind, but as vintage interviews with Roy Thomas,  Herb Trimpe, Dave Cockrum, and even Len Wein, himself,  has told it in published interviews, Thomas came up with the not just the name, but (again, according to more than one source) the stature (short), his temperament, that he was a mutant, and in these accounts, that he was Canadian. 

John Romita, Sr., designed the look. Not clear on the claws, except that Wein considered them part of the suit. So, what did Wein contribute that wasn't already brought to him? Seriously asking. "Weapon X" as a code-name?

I have known literally for decades about Roy Thomas's involvement because it was mentioned in a number of articles and interviews I read since childhood,  and Wein didn't contest those accounts during that period that I remember.  I'm not saying Wein doesn't deserve his credit as co-creator, but I do think Thomas deserves credit, too. 

Thomas never suggests Wolverine (and the details he came up with), then the character as we know it does not ever exist. Yes, others like Claremont, Cockrum,  and JB, expanded on the character,  but without Roy coming up with the basic character and handing it off to Wein, there would not be THE Wolverine as we know it.

And, no, the fella who won the FOOM contest, who also wants to take credit for Wolverine's Admantium skeleton,  apparently,  is not the creator of the Wolverine we know. He truly did only come up with a name. Roy did more than that. 

Heck, I copyrighted my design of a character I named "Carnage" in 1986. I have never thought about suing Marvel,  because I'd lose, as I knew even back when that you can't copyright a name, only trademark it. And I didn't trademark the name. And, my Carnage looked nothing like what came from Marvel.

I even came up with a character named the Canadian Shield while in grade school, after having learned about the mountain range in Canada. I connected "shield" to Captain America in my mind,  so being a comic book fan it seemed natural to use Canadian Shield for a superhero.  Many years later, JB mentions here in the forum that he thought of using that name for an early version of Vindicator/Guardian,  as I recall. 

So, yeah, if it was simply that Roy came up with the name, I wouldn't think that's strong enough.  It was more than that, though. 


Edited by Matt Hawes on 03 April 2024 at 11:27pm
Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Rebecca Jansen
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 February 2018
Location: Canada
Posts: 4635
Posted: 03 April 2024 at 11:26pm | IP Logged | 6 post reply

This is the problem with folk songs, who started one may've been entirely forgotten so whoever was the person who had some version of it when it was finally recorded down on paper or audio medium like Huddie Ledbetter (Leadbelly) might be credited, or the ever reliable 'Traditional' after which someone can claim 'Arrangement by' for their own unique take.

If Wolverine were a folk song it might be credited circa 1979-80 (Thomas/Romita Sr./Wein/Trimpe/Cockrum, Arr. Claremont/Byrne). I guess that's not going to happen.
Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Matt Hawes
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 16502
Posted: 03 April 2024 at 11:39pm | IP Logged | 7 post reply

I will add this one last thing: While, obviously,  Wein's widow doesn't want Thomas getting even a co-credit, apparently regardless of whether he actually gets any monetary gain for it, I'm fairly certain Disney would LOVE not to give EITHER any money (or actually even just credit. Ask Ub Iwerks, or his heirs). So, if they are acknowledging in ANY way that Roy Thomas had ANY involvement in the creation of Wolverine,  they aren't doing this because they're ran by a bunch of sweethearts. 

I guarantee theu have ran things by their legal department and figured it's best to cover their butts to fend off any perceived potential lawsuits over the matter. Because,  you can bet your sweet bippy if they found their wasn't enough evidence to suggest they could owe Thomas a co-creator credit, they wouldn't give him one. It's all about the money, and I am certain the don't want to give up more than they absolutely have to in credit or payments. 


Edited by Matt Hawes on 03 April 2024 at 11:41pm
Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Rick Whiting
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 22 April 2004
Posts: 2215
Posted: 03 April 2024 at 11:44pm | IP Logged | 8 post reply

Wolverine was created by Andy Olsen who submitted the character as part of a contest by the marvel publication FOOM .
Marvel used the contest to swipe ideas from children
Roy Thomas is getting credit why not him?

___________________

With the possible exception of the name "Wolverine", I would argue that Olsen and Marvel swiped ideas for Wolverine from the 1968 Captain America novel CAPTAIN AMERICA: THE GREAT GOLD STEAL

https://tombrevoort.com/2020/10/11/blah-blah-blog-the-great- gold-steal/#:~:text=Rather%20than%20getting%20his%20powers,n othing%20special%20about%20Cap's%20shield%E2%80%93
Back to Top profile | search
 
Rodrigo castellanos
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 03 July 2012
Location: Uruguay
Posts: 1515
Posted: 03 April 2024 at 11:45pm | IP Logged | 9 post reply

But if Thomas is just saying "Give a character named Wolverine and make him Canadian." All he really has is a concept.  It would be like me saying "Make me a car that runs on water and make it red." doesn't make me a part of the creative process.

Thank you.

It really seems some people really struggle to understand what creative work actually is. That would be a "briefing" in any creative process, not a creative act on itself.

I do acknowledge that Marvel has historically muddled this issue. Stan was of this mind, and Thomas was his protege after all. 

Reminds me of this Key & Peele sketch, based on Stan's reality show ("Who wants to be a superhero?"):


It's obviously a joke based on Stan's later years and I mean no disrespect but it illustrates the issue pretty well: throwing names and powers around is not a creative act.

A character is not a name and powers, it's a STORY. If it were, guys like the kid that won that Marvel contest would be top creators.


Back to Top profile | search
 
Mark Haslett
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 6431
Posted: 03 April 2024 at 11:57pm | IP Logged | 10 post reply

Herb Trimpe said, “I don’t want to take away anybody's ability to make a few bucks, but it was it Roy's concept and John's character design. The writer in my opinion gave the character a voice and actually collaborated with the artist in terms of bringing the character to life, which is no small thing, but it's not really the originator of the concept.”

How does anyone think what Trimpe meant was, "Thomas just said "Give a character named Wolverine and make him Canadian." The way you might say, "Make me a car that runs on water and make it red"?

If that's what Trimpe meant, why do you think he went so far out of his way to go on the record about it even though he worried it might mess up the money end of the attribution?

And I'm sorry, Rodrigo, but what part of the "STORY" did John Romita contribute? Did he not co-create Wolverine?
Back to Top profile | search
 
Rodrigo castellanos
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 03 July 2012
Location: Uruguay
Posts: 1515
Posted: 04 April 2024 at 12:04am | IP Logged | 11 post reply

And I'm sorry, Rodrigo, but what part of the "STORY" did John Romita contribute? Did he not co-create Wolverine?

He defined the character visually, I'd say. 

Co-Creation in comics usually means the guy that wrote the story and the guy who drew it, who is usually the same guy that designed the character.

In this case, it's different. As there is irrefutable evidence that Romita designed the character visually and Trimpe followed that design in the actual comic, I'd still credit Romita as creator.

But I admit this case in particular is a complicated one. Kirby claimed credit on Spider-Man once too, and I think he was wrong on that one. Each case has certain complications in this muddled up medium.

But an editor is not a creator, ever. I'll stand by that.




Back to Top profile | search
 
Mark Haslett
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 6431
Posted: 04 April 2024 at 12:18am | IP Logged | 12 post reply

Between the time there was nothing and when there was something stands the creator(s).

The line between creation and extrapolation has to be drawn somewhere.

The simple cases are all the same.

The complicated cases are all unique!
Back to Top profile | search
 

<< Prev Page of 12 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login