I never cared for Chic Stone, whom I found heavy handed.  Giacoia was a good inker for Kirby, rarely mentioned, but did some nice work on Captain America, and briefly, on Thor.  I liked Colletta on Thor at the outset, but it was hard to like him when I had a chance to compare his work to stats of Kirby's pencils--figures erased or blacked in, backgrounds omitted.  Eccentrically, there are two Kirby inkers I enjoyed that don't command wide favor--Paul Reinman, who did nice work, I thought, on some of the early Tales of Asgard, and George Bell (Roussos), whose work I liked on the Fantastic Four, although obviously no one was in Sinnott's class.  (I admit, however, to loathing Roussos' work on Steve Ditko, be it the Hulk or Dr. Strange).  I liked Ayers, too.  The mystery of Ayers for me was that he had a very confident, bold brush line inking Kirby in the early days, and in fact, on his own early work in the fifties, but by the time he started inking his own work on Sgt. Fury, the bold brush work was completely absent, replaced by timorous and undistinguished pen work.  Never quite understood what happened

I liked Colletta's inks for the Tales of Asgard stories, where they gave the pencils an appropriate fairy tale vibe, to contrast with the more down-to-earth look of Stone's pencils on the modern-day stories. Once Colletta took over the whole book ... well, I just missed Stone a lot.

Colletta on THOR

Sinnott on FANTASTIC FOUR/Royer on ATLAS & CAPTAIN AMERICA (tie)

Ditko on random reprints

Other people (don't recall ever seeing Wood on Kirby)

Sorry to the anti-Colletta contingent out there, but those THORs (especially in the big Treasury Edition) had a lasting impact on me.  That slightly more feathery/scratchy/pencily look was very effective for the legendary aspect.  JB inked by Tony DeZuniga on that one MARVEL TEAM-UP with Thor has the same effect.

Looking back, the adult me can really appreciate everything Sinnott added to his pages though.