Posted: 15 January 2015 at 5:56pm | IP Logged | 12
|
|
|
But that, in my not even remotely humble opinion, was fan-wankery of the worst kind, stuffed to bursting with useless trivia. The original SUPERMAN vs THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN set a perfect matrix, one I have done my best to follow. -----------------------------------------------------I'm right with you in so far as Superman vs ASM was a more natural, more accessible and simply better approach than the over-thinking of JLA/Avengers... but the latter does mean Batman would not HAVE to share a universe with Spider-Man in order for them to meet.
I mean, this whole discussion does fit under the heading of trivial -- sometimes fans like to have a little discussion that doesn't amount to a whole hill of beans.
I think perhaps the original question might be better couched as 'Which could you more easily envisage: a story in which x beats y or a story in which y beats x?'
The unornamented 'who would win in a fight between x and y' does, to me, suggest a straight dust-up, which lends itself to the one with the superior power set.
For example... I can more easily envisage a story in which the FF beat Galactus than the other way round, because (a) I've seen it several times before and (b) they are heroes, and we expect heroes to find a way to win.
But, who would win a fight between the FF and Galactus? I'd go with Galactus.
So, can I easily envisage a story in which Batman beats Spider-Man? Yes.
Who do I think wins if they have a scrap? Spider-Man.
Edited by Peter Martin on 15 January 2015 at 5:59pm
|