Byrne Robotics: Q For Mr Byrne - Facial Hair On Characters

The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum		<< Prev Page of 3

Topic: Q For Mr Byrne - Facial Hair On Characters (

Topic Closed)

Author

Message

Mark Haslett
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 6445

Posted: 06 November 2013 at 4:30pm \| IP Logged \| 1

Neil: Short in the front and sides and long in the back. Clooney does not have a mullet. Just longer hair.

***

...which is shorter in the front and sides.

I tend to think of the extreme mullet that you posted too. That's why I googled "mullet" to see what the internet said. That's where I found Billy Ray Cyrus and George Clooney counted in the club and realized not all Mullets are the same.

But let's say you're right. ...And then what?

profile | search

Neil Lindholm
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 January 2005
Location: China
Posts: 4945

Posted: 06 November 2013 at 6:02pm \| IP Logged \| 2

Then I ..win? I don't get your comment.

When I was younger, the picture I posted was a mullet. Not an extreme mullet, just a mullet. George Clooney has long hair in that picture. Someone with hair a few inches longer in the back is now classed as having a mullet, even though it is not a mullet. (I have heard students tease other students for this). Superman had long hair pulled back over his ears. Very different things.

Urban dictionary - mullet

profile | search e-mail

Joel Tesch
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 May 2006
Posts: 2830

Posted: 07 November 2013 at 2:19pm \| IP Logged \| 3

I think these days typically if a dude has long hair with bangs it's considered a mullet. There are extreme examples...but Superman's definitely was a mullet. So was Wonder Man's in WCA. And in fact, Nathan was developing a nice mullet near the end of JB's first Next Men run.

It will be back one day!

profile | search

Vinny Valenti
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 17 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 8122

Posted: 07 November 2013 at 2:28pm \| IP Logged \| 4

Superman's hair was not shorter on top, so technically not a mullet.

This was me at 16:

THAT was a mullet! Ok, go ahead and laugh....

profile | search

Joel Tesch
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 May 2006
Posts: 2830

Posted: 07 November 2013 at 3:12pm \| IP Logged \| 5

Yes it was shorter on top (see below)...so technically it was a mullet. Not as glorious as 16-year-old you had (or me for that matter!). But 'twas indeed mullet.

profile | search

Sorry, you can NOT post a reply.
This topic is closed.

<< Prev Page of 3

Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum