Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 6 Next >>
Topic: Scary Skulls (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Armindo Macieira
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 15 October 2006
Location: Portugal
Posts: 955
Posted: 28 April 2013 at 2:34pm | IP Logged | 1  

This is why I'd LOVE to travel back in time to the Triassic, Jurassic and Cretaceous just to take a good look at all those dinosaurs we "know" so well.
All in all we have no idea exactly how they looked like... how much flesh, colours, feathers and other ornaments not to mention their behaviour.

A couple of months travelling from the Cambrian to the last ice age would be the perfect vacation for me! 
Back to Top profile | search | www
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 133266
Posted: 28 April 2013 at 4:01pm | IP Logged | 2  

Art Adams, Bill Stout and I had an interesting -- and unfortunately brief -- conversation many years ago about what dinosaurs might have looked like. I was already strongly advocating the "more meat" approach to reconstruction, and Arthur took it a step further when he noted there was no current way to know if dinosaurs had external ears, like dogs and humans. I was already carrying in my head an image of the T-Rex that looked a lot more like a hippo than the traditional dragon. Suddenly I found my mind's eye confronted with one that looked like a beagle!
Back to Top profile | search
 
Michael Penn
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 April 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 12699
Posted: 28 April 2013 at 4:55pm | IP Logged | 3  

My five year old recently got very into dinosaurs (not coincidentally after his first trip to the American Museum of Natural History) and he's already firing away with questions. Why did Tyrannosaurs have such small arms, what good were they for? If some dinosaurs used tails for balance when walking, why did Brachiosaurs and Apatosaurs need them when they had such big wide feet, and four of them also? Why do people make the same dinosaurs with feathers sometimes and other times without? Et cetera!
Back to Top profile | search
 
Terry Thielen
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 30 May 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 480
Posted: 28 April 2013 at 6:13pm | IP Logged | 4  

William Stout has come around a lot since he did his book "The Dinosaurs" which was born in a time where shrink-wrapped dinosaurs were coming into favor as a backlash to all the years of tail-dragging fatties. 
from "The Dinosaurs" 1981

and from 2008

well... maybe not the heads so much, but he has fleshed out his bodies considerably.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Noah Smith
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 29 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 1217
Posted: 28 April 2013 at 6:22pm | IP Logged | 5  

Hippos are adorable, to be certain, but I believe they kill more people every year than any other animal.  To quote comedian Mike Birbiglia, "I didn't even know hippos ate humans. I just thought they ate those little white marbles. I thought that was the point of 'Hungry Hungry Hippos', that hippos are marblevores."
Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Carmen Bernardo
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 08 August 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 3666
Posted: 28 April 2013 at 6:26pm | IP Logged | 6  

Looking at that hippo skull reminds me of what people who've been in contact with them have had to deal with.  They're actually quite aggressive.  Victims have had their arms ripped out of their sockets by them. 

Of particular note for me is the mythology of ancient Egypt.  Set is described as having a hippopotamus's face.  His signal act was to dismember his brother Horus after killing him (mama Isis made him better).  Pretty much what an enraged hippo does, so you could guess why the Egyptians used that beast as the death god's totem.

I do wonder about the dinosaurs, though.  This shrink-wrapped lizard face is quite persistent.  I recall seeing a picture of a triceratops with its frill hidden behind a mass of muscles that made it look more like a pig than the familiar form we've been given.  Kind of freaky.

Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 133266
Posted: 28 April 2013 at 7:06pm | IP Logged | 7  

"Type casting" has a lot to do with how we portray other animals. Hippos are kinda cute looking, so we imagine them to be docile. Like the way we basically swap the personalities of chimps and gorillas. And, of course, when the first dinosaur fossils were found people cast them as lizards and dragons, and it took centuries to even begin to shake that image.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Jodi Moisan
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 February 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 6832
Posted: 28 April 2013 at 7:26pm | IP Logged | 8  

I have also wandered about feathers, don't they say that dinosaurs were sort of related to birds. I think where I get the lizard vibe, is the fact alligators are still here and I see them as modern day dinosaurs.

In my mind a lot of them looked like this



Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Thom Price
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar
L’Homme Diabolique

Joined: 29 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 7593
Posted: 28 April 2013 at 7:44pm | IP Logged | 9  

While I can accept the plausibility of dinosaurs having feathers, I don't think it will ever alter the image of them in my head.  In my imagination, they will always look like the creatures in the original KING KONG; it's just too ingrained.

(Big time tangent: I'm in the same boat, so to speak, when it comes to Vikings.  In my mind they will always have horned helmets.  I know there is no historical evidence for this, and that it would have been wildly impractical to wear them in the close quarters of a ship -- they'd be poking each others' eyes out left and right.  I tried watching some of the TV series VIKINGS and just couldn't get past their look.  Vikings without horned helmets is like ... well, dinosaurs with feathers!)

Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Terry Thielen
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 30 May 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 480
Posted: 28 April 2013 at 8:07pm | IP Logged | 10  

one thing to remember is that dinosaurs are not mammals. It's easy for humans to look around at other mammals and start trying to attribute certain aspects onto dinosaurs. 

The pig-like ceratopsian idea was tossed out there, but there isn't any evidence that the frills of ceratopsians had that amount muscle attachment. For many reasons the idea doesn't make sense.

Harder to disprove fleshy bits, like external ears, but with dinosaur relations with both birds and lizards helps to see why perhaps it's not very likely that dinosaurs would have external ears. (here is a nice link about bird ears) The idea that Giraffatitan could have a trunk like an elephant was tossed out there by Robert Bakker in the 70s. There are reasons why this is very unlikely, but it caused people to try and look at dinosaurs differently. I am all for new views on dinosaurs, but hopefully the science will be there to support these ideas or disprove them. 


Here is a nice book that is a breath of fresh air for those that would like a new view on dinosaurs. All Yesterdays: Unique and Speculative Views of Dinosaurs and Other Prehistoric Animals
Back to Top profile | search
 
Terry Thielen
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 30 May 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 480
Posted: 28 April 2013 at 8:09pm | IP Logged | 11  

"accept the plausibility of dinosaurs having feathers"

It's not just plausible, it's a fact.
Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 133266
Posted: 29 April 2013 at 5:05am | IP Logged | 12  

Given the great range in size and shape of the frill, the area behind it being filled in with muscle seems highly unlikely, if only because it would be a great impediment to free movement of the head.

But further given their vegetarian diet, the frill serving as the mounting base for strong jaw muscles is not an extraordinary concept. As I have noted before, when this has come up, there are muscle attachment points on a human skull that correspond to those on most other animals, a placing the fingertips on the side of the head, above the ears, and clenching the teeth quickly demonstrates how high our own jaw muscles are attached. Needing an even greater mechanical advantage in order to deal with tough vegetation could easily have led to the development of the frill.

(The black and white line drawing, seen above, does NOT reflect this configuration, of course. There we see a fairly conventional restoration with a "blob" of muscle in front of the frill that serves no apparent purpose.)

Back to Top profile | search
 

<< Prev Page of 6 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login