++

Yes, should have been higher up.

••

It should not have been on a list of "stories" at all. It was not a story. It was a coldly calculated stunt, designed to appeal primarily to the speculators, and responsible for actually driving away many long time readers.

i'm not fond of the whole "death of superman" storyline. no disrespect to dan jurgens and the other creators is meant at all, but i thought the story--as told through several successive issues of all three superman titles-- was: doomsday crashlands in some nowhere place, smashes up stuff, superman flies in, punch-brawl-punch, oh no! innocent bystander in danger! superman saves innocent bystander, doomsday jumps to next nowhere place, rinse lather repeat all the way to metropolis (with a brief and painfully ineffective intervention by the justice league).

and the final couple of stories are robbed of dramatic tension, because superman and doomsday don't look like they are on their last legs. check those pages-- superman does not look like a guy who's about to die but is giving it his all. he's got some cuts and a pretty good stab wound on the side but hell, he's barely winded to judge by how he's holding up.

then blammo, they swap sunday punches and they're both dead. for awhile.

it WAS a stunt, and a very effective one, but let's not call it one of superman's greatest stories. it really wasn't great or much of a story.

This "Death of Superman" is "important" all right -- important in just how much it contributed to the destruction of the comicbook industry.