Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 11
Topic: Robin Dies Horribly...Who Cares? (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Lars Sandmark
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 05 October 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 3144
Posted: 09 March 2013 at 7:56am | IP Logged | 1  

...but both are fiction.

The point I tried to make by the comparing cartoon charcters from the Simpsons and comicbook characters like Spider-Man is that neither should be shown as aging because THEY ARE NOT REAL. Showing these characters growing into old men ruins these Fictional Characters for future generations of fans imho.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Ed Love
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 05 October 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 2712
Posted: 09 March 2013 at 2:39pm | IP Logged | 2  

The concept of the "eternal now" though is a relatively new one, to the 20th Century. Characters, even series characters before then aged. When Dumas wrote his sequels to The Three Musketeers, the characters aged. Doyle had Watson and Holmes age through his series. Your boy inventor series such as Jack Wright, Frank Reade, Tom Swift, all had the boys have their adventures, then aged them to adulthood with their sons taking over the adventures.

It was with the rise of comic strips, pulps and comic books that the concept of not aging came into being. And, even then it's not a hard and fast rule, that aging is good or bad, or there's only one way to handle it. Strips like Blondie, Dick Tracy,  The Phantom and Prince Valiant have all acknowledged the passage of time in regards to the characters getting married, having kids and watching the kids get older, but the principle characters staying visibly somewhere in adulthood. Gasoline Alley, and later For Better or For Worse, dealt with aging more honestly across the board. And, others don't seem to age at all. Especially true of the pulp heroes who had careers that spanned well over a decade and were still dealt with as if they were as young as they started despite most of them having careers that linked them up to WWI! Tom Batiuk's Funky Winkerbean went on for years with the characters not aging, then suddenly he jumps forward a decade. And, he jumped forward again.

I think part of it also was no one really gave it that much thought, that these characters would still be being read and followed for decades.

Either choice is a valid one, it all depends on the type of universe and stories the company and creators want to tell and then using the proper story mechanics. Which is where DC and Marvel screw up. They want both real change, continuity heavy universes AND the illusion of change and then they introduce kid characters and/or age them, calling attention to the fact that other characters are not aging.
Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Joe Zhang
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 12857
Posted: 09 March 2013 at 7:29pm | IP Logged | 3  

Given the tendency of publishers to reset and reboot their franchises every decade or so, perhaps it's OK for characters to age. 
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 

Sorry, you can NOT post a reply.
This topic is closed.

<< Prev Page of 11
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login