Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 4
Topic: Q for JB: Hopping in the time machine... (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Charles Nelson
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 25 June 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 246
Posted: 16 January 2013 at 10:56pm | IP Logged | 1  

Yeah, Flavio. That's what I was thinking. Culture and art have to meet for something to catch fire. If there was such a reaction to aspects of his character, eventually some other character would have shared some of those aspects and caught fire if he had not been around to do so. He may have gotten there first, but in his absence someone else would have,eventually, I think.
By the way, I really liked Wolverine much better when he had to heal more slowly. Limits on a character are actually freeing in the hands of a thoughtful creator.
Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 133560
Posted: 17 January 2013 at 5:59am | IP Logged | 2  

JB, any temptation to use the time michine to accept Shooter's offer of script approval on X-Men, instead of leaving the title?

••

That wasn't offered. Just before I left, Shooter had offered me script approval, meaning I would be able to read all the scripts BEFORE the book was lettered and published, but that sounded like a whole lot of hassle -- as I am sure Shooter knew it would.

Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 133560
Posted: 17 January 2013 at 6:06am | IP Logged | 3  

some other character ( or characters) wouldn't have taken their place in filling that role in the industry? It seems that there was a demand for such a character, and Wolverine turned into it. Someone else probably would have, I think. Your thoughts?

+++++

I think some other "rebel" character, like the LOSH's WILDFIRE or TIMBER WOLF might've filled this gap.

••

Again, a reminder that back then, circa 1975, the "rebels" had not yet started to make their presence felt. Wolverine was a minor character, as witness by the fact Chris and Dave were prepared to dump him. I was the one who "adopted" Wolverine, brought him to center stage, and turned up the heat. Howard Chaykin has been known to say the whole "darkening" of the industry was MY FAULT, because of what I did with Wolverine.

There wasn't a whole lot of demand, when I started on X-MEN, for a "rebel" character. The biggest seller was still Spider-Man, who at that point, with three monthlies including a team-up book, was a long way from the "outsider" he started out as!

Back to Top profile | search
 
Greg Woronchak
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 04 September 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 1631
Posted: 17 January 2013 at 9:19am | IP Logged | 4  

had said Batman and Wonder Woman didn't like each

Ugh, anti-social Batman isn't a more interesting character, in my books.

I remember fondly the Brave and the Bolds where he got along with basically everybody <g>
Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 133560
Posted: 17 January 2013 at 9:23am | IP Logged | 5  

Somewhere along the way. Batman went from "the World's Greatest Detective" to "the Most Dangerous Man Alive". A pendulum swing I think we could have done without. There are plenty of steps between the Batman who appears at statue dedications and library openings and the Batman who is a psycho ninja.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Andrew Bitner
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 01 June 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 7526
Posted: 17 January 2013 at 9:26am | IP Logged | 6  

oh boy do i agree. batman's job, historically, was fighting crime IN GOTHAM CITY. if he left, it was because he needed to trace the origin or source of something that was causing problems in his city.

then, suddenly, he's got plans to take down every superbeing on the planet, the tools to do so (don't you think wayne enterprises shareholders would wonder where the profits were going?) and the mad-on to care about being "the most dangerous AND PREPARED man alive."

i mean, yeesh.

Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 133560
Posted: 17 January 2013 at 11:12am | IP Logged | 7  

Roger Stern used to note that during the Silver Age things went sufficiently off the rails that in a random issue of SUPERMAN you would find him fighting bank robbers, while in a random issue of BATMAN you would find him fighting aliens.

What happened to demarcation??

This is something all too common in superhero comics, and has been for many a year. When Stan, Jack and Steve were laying the foundations of the Marvel "Universe", the characters they came up with tended to be "specialists". Super-science menace, let the FF take care of it. Street level stuff, that's Spider-Man's territory. And the X-Men were all about mutants.

Of course, extraterrestrials tended to slip in everywhere, from time to time. The Skrulls, the Space Phantom, those aliens the Terrible Tinkerer hung out with (and was revealed to be one of), etc, etc. Aliens in that part of the Silver Age were common coinage. A quick way to get a story started.

When things settled down, tho, we saw less and less of this cross-pollination. Spider-Man didn't see too many aliens. Neither did the X-Men. Nor did either battle much that was outside their established bailiwick. But by the time I started working for Marvel, things were starting to get "sloppy". The very first issue of X-MEN I worked on had them off on an alien planet dealing with a universe-threatening menace. Surely the FF's domain? In fact, one of the things Roger Stern (as editor) and I pushed for was more and more MUTANT storylines. That's why Lilandra and her storyline got shoved onto the furthest back of the back burners. How soon after my arrival was Magneto back in the saddle?

Back to Top profile | search
 
Andrew Bitner
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 01 June 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 7526
Posted: 17 January 2013 at 11:29am | IP Logged | 8  

i can see where it would be fun to do a mismatch type of story sometimes, where the x-men fight the circus of crime or spider-man takes on bullseye or something... but each hero or team builds up their particular rogue's gallery for a reason-- exactly as JB illustrates.

batman should be fighting criminals-- WEIRD criminals, sure, but guys who commit crimes to make themselves rich. superman should be fighting big and really dangerous enemies, the kind that nobody BUT superman would be facing.

doing a mismatch is fun, but done over and over, it makes the heroes and villains... well, not quite interchangeable but not well-suited for each other. what would happen if superman fought the joker as often as he fought lex luthor?

i suspect it's that very thing that pushed batman to becoming something very different than when he started.



Edited by Andrew Bitner on 17 January 2013 at 11:30am
Back to Top profile | search
 

Sorry, you can NOT post a reply.
This topic is closed.

<< Prev Page of 4
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login