Posted: 12 January 2013 at 5:45am | IP Logged | 2
|
|
|
It's really too bad about those Dick Ayers inks... I want so much to love the art is those early FF issues. You can still make out the dynamics of Kirby, of course, but the inking is just so sloppy-looking...•• My little fantasy is in no way to be taken as a negative comment about Dick Ayers! I am a big fan of his inks from that period, and far from "sloppy" I thought he brought a richness to Kirby's pencils -- which, as we can tell from the Chic Stone inks of the same vintage, would have been more akin to what we'd call breakdowns today. Unlike Stone (whose work I also liked), Ayers did much more than merely "trace" over Kirby's line. He brought shading a texture to the panels, and a good deal of depth. I think it stands as a pretty solid endorsement of Ayers' inks, in fact, that it was many years before I realized Sinnott had actually inked some of the figures on the second page of the sixth issue of FF. Stone's inks are so simple and unadorned, in fact, that I have often contemplated printing out some large, faded copies, and trying my hand at inking them. They are, after all, very close to what Kirby's pencils must have looked like then. Altho a strip, not a comic book, this SURF HUNTER sample gives us an idea of what Kirby's pencils most likely looked like in his 10-books-a-month days at Marvel. And the Wally Wood inks show us what a really good inker/finisher was able to do with them! (Two different dailies, obvious!!)
|