| Author |
|
Eric Smearman
Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 02 September 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 5822
|
| Posted: 02 June 2012 at 8:59pm | IP Logged | 1
|
|
|
I remember really enjoying Len Wein and Paris Cullens' BLUE
BEETLE run. And I loved JB's BB in LEGENDS!
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
e-mail
|
| |
Mike Norris
Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 4274
|
| Posted: 02 June 2012 at 9:50pm | IP Logged | 2
|
|
|
The Question was the best of the bunch.( though far removed from the source material) Captain Atom was probably the worst. Never quite gelled for me. Especially the costume. The second Charlton costume was a great design.
I enjoyed the Blue Beetle. It was an attempt to do fun comics. which in the 80s was going against the grain.
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
e-mail
|
| |
John Byrne
Grumpy Old Guy
Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 133279
|
| Posted: 03 June 2012 at 4:09am | IP Logged | 3
|
|
|
I enjoyed the Blue Beetle. It was an attempt to do fun comics. which in the 80s was going against the grain. •• It was an attempt to do SPIDER-MAN --- which is NOT what the Blue Beetle was all about.
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
| |
Shawn Kane
Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 04 November 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 3239
|
| Posted: 03 June 2012 at 7:26am | IP Logged | 4
|
|
|
I cringe every time I hear someone refer to themselves as a "fanboy". Exactly. I personally don't like the term "nerd" or "geek" being used to describe comic book readers either (or really anything else for that matter).
Edited by Shawn Kane on 03 June 2012 at 7:26am
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
| |
Darren De Vouge
Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 04 December 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 3586
|
| Posted: 03 June 2012 at 11:46am | IP Logged | 5
|
|
|
I enjoyed the Blue Beetle. It was an attempt to do fun comics. which in the 80s was going against the grain. +++
It was an attempt to do SPIDER-MAN --- which is NOT what the Blue Beetle was all about.
***
And sadly, that was the high point. Then came. the BWA-HA-HA phase. That was truly awful!
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
| |
John Byrne
Grumpy Old Guy
Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 133279
|
| Posted: 03 June 2012 at 11:53am | IP Logged | 6
|
|
|
When I did BATMAN & CAPTAIN AMERICA, I said I hoped it might inspire the next "trend" in comics -- FUN!!I also said I knew all too well that if this happened it would not take long for "Fun" to degenerate into "goofy", as "relevant" spawned "grim and gritty" which became "glum". Too many writers today simply can't do "fun" comics without being condescending. To the material, AND to the readers. After all, when we see THIS… 
…do we think of THIS… 
...or THIS? 
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
| |
Mason Meomartini
Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 06 June 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 174
|
| Posted: 03 June 2012 at 12:05pm | IP Logged | 7
|
|
|
Shawn Kane I agree, but now fans are happy to use those terms to describe themselves, as if that takes off the nasty vibe they carry. It's something like what Sam Harris said about atheists using that label for themselves at the Atheist Alliance conference in 2007: " ... our opponents draw the chalk-outline of a dead man on the sidewalk, and we just walk up and lie down in it."
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
| |
John Byrne
Grumpy Old Guy
Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 133279
|
| Posted: 03 June 2012 at 12:10pm | IP Logged | 8
|
|
|
There's a problem with calling oneself an "atheist"? I didn't get the memo!
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
| |
John Byrne
Grumpy Old Guy
Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 133279
|
| Posted: 03 June 2012 at 12:14pm | IP Logged | 9
|
|
|
Just poked around a bit online, and as near as I can tell, Harris seems to be making the case that "atheist" is a pejorative label applied from outside.He is, quite simply, wrong. And now back to our scheduled discussion. . .
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
| |
Richard White
Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 28 August 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1058
|
| Posted: 03 June 2012 at 12:42pm | IP Logged | 10
|
|
|
1963 has to be one of the most dull comics I have ever read, failing to capture any aspect of the wonderful comics it alludes to. Didn't really appreciate the pissy jibes toward Stan Lee either.
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
| www
e-mail
|
| |
John Byrne
Grumpy Old Guy
Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 133279
|
| Posted: 03 June 2012 at 12:44pm | IP Logged | 11
|
|
|
1963 has to be one of the most dull comics I have ever read, failing to capture any aspect of the wonderful comics it alludes to. Didn't really appreciate the pissy jibes toward Stan Lee either.•• Jack Kirby and Steve Ditko have earned the right to take shots at Stan, if such shots are necessary. No one else has.
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
| |
Richard White
Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 28 August 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1058
|
| Posted: 03 June 2012 at 12:53pm | IP Logged | 12
|
|
|
While I love the comics that Steve Ditko and Jack Kirby did sans Stan, you only have to look at those comics to see what Stan brought to the table. And what he brought was pretty wonderful and I'm sure an essential ingredient to the success of Marvel.
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
| www
e-mail
|
| |
Topic Closed)
