Posted: 15 September 2011 at 8:12am | IP Logged | 6
|
|
|
"Charles, you're leaping (without evidence) to the existence of technologies whose function is unsupported by scientific principles in order to explain something that is fully explainable by primitive tools and muscle and that is part of still extant building and art practices." I think there is proof these technologies are proven. That is why I think everyone needs to examine Dr. Judy Wood's website. Listen to here interview I posted. Google the Hutchison effect. And it just happens the WTC was loaded with design elements from the pyramids at Giza. "This is what I mean by Dunn and his ilk first making you swallow the lie that the truth is impossible, so they can feed you this pablum of unsubstantiated drivel." I have dealt with machining and sculpting.. and I have read his books. From what I have read there is no question in my mind. The only question is if he is being factual about certain elements his theories rely on. If this wasn't the case he would be a liar.. and I juts don't get that sense from him. And also.. there was that insect shell element he didn't even understand that tied in perfectly with info I had researched. This just supports the idea that the pyramid had some advanced function as well. Juts too great of a coincidence for me. "That's not being outside the box, Charles. That's cramming yourself into a tinier box and locking yourself in. What you need to do is to actually educate yourself on the building practices of the Ancient Egyptians. Not through Dunn, but through mainstream sources." That is what I am in the process of doing.. thanks for the advice though. Am am familiar with them as well.. I have a very strong curiosity. It is something that had interested me before but not to this level. As I said.. I had believed the conventional explanations before.. but if you look at the actual details closely you see something else is going on here.
|