Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 20 Next >>
Topic: Jim Shooter: The Origin of the Dark Phoenix Saga Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Matt Hawes
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 16518
Posted: 29 June 2011 at 9:04am | IP Logged | 1 post reply

A person posted a small part of the court transcript on Jim Shooter's blog that addresses Shooter's claim that JB said he earned 10 million dollars from Marvel...


 QUOTE:

Question: "You have earned over ten million dollars at Marvel?"


Byrne: "That's probably fair."

He then qualified that with the following, after stating that he made less money doing Alpha Flight than any other book;

Question: "During your career you earned 20 million from others than Alpha Flight?"


Byrne: "Right. I should point out that did not earn 10 million specifically from Marvel. I would say ten million probably in the course of my entire career, I have made four or five million doing the Next Men, which I created to own at Dark Horse.

Jim Shooter's response to the facts:

 Jim Shooter wrote:
...I remembered the "That's probably fair" part, if not the exact quote. The point is he made a lot of money...

Back to Top profile | search | www
 
William Roberge
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 05 July 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 11322
Posted: 29 June 2011 at 9:10am | IP Logged | 2 post reply

So...Don't confuse yourself with the facts, just believe what I say.
Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 133742
Posted: 29 June 2011 at 10:24am | IP Logged | 3 post reply

Question: "You have earned over ten million dollars at Marvel?"

Byrne: "That's probably fair."

He then qualified that with the following, after stating that he made less money doing Alpha Flight than any other book;

Question: "During your career you earned 20 million from others than Alpha Flight?"

Byrne: "Right. I should point out that did not earn 10 million specifically from Marvel. I would say ten million probably in the course of my entire career, I have made four or five million doing the Next Men, which I created to own at Dark Horse.

••

??!!

I think there must be a transcription error there. I could say with confidence that during Shooter's time at the company, I GENERATED more than 10 million dollars in income FOR MARVEL, but for me to have EARNED ten million myself would have required my receiving a MUCH larger share of the sales than was the reality.*

Same with NEXT MEN. Altho that book was a HUGE seller when it started (outselling any other direct sales only book by something like a factor of ten), even the (by then) high cover price and larger share of the sales would not have put $5,000,000 into MY pocket.

I can only have been talking about what the PUBLISHERS were earning from the books I worked on.

–––

* Do the math, and you will see my run on FANTASTIC FOUR probably pulled in close to $9,000,000 FOR MARVEL, but since the first half of that run was done without royalties, my own share would have been around $180,000.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Matt Hawes
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 16518
Posted: 29 June 2011 at 11:48am | IP Logged | 4 post reply

I've tried to locate the court transcript online to read the quotes in context and see if the person who posted on Jim Shooter's blog omitted anything relevant, but the "Comics Journal" site didn't make the transcript available online.
Back to Top profile | search | www
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 133742
Posted: 29 June 2011 at 12:03pm | IP Logged | 5 post reply

Like I said -- the numbers are there for anyone to access. It's easy enough to calculate the real amounts.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Tony Loyd
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 05 April 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 131
Posted: 29 June 2011 at 1:34pm | IP Logged | 6 post reply

Do the math, and you will see my run on FANTASTIC FOUR probably pulled in close to $9,000,000 FOR MARVEL, but since the first half of that run was done without royalties, my own share would have been around $180,000. ----JB

How much of that did you get to keep after local, state and federal taxes, retirement and health care costs are deducted?

When someone wins the lottery and the amount is annouced, I imediatley begin to think, "How much did they REALLY win?" after taxes are subtracted.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Eric Ladd
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 August 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 4504
Posted: 29 June 2011 at 2:03pm | IP Logged | 7 post reply

Tony, Federal and State tax on 1 million is roughly $390,000. A good friend of mine won a million in Indiana about four years ago and that is what he paid in state and federal

edited to address Tony.


Edited by Eric Ladd on 29 June 2011 at 4:37pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Andy Mokler
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 20 January 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 2799
Posted: 29 June 2011 at 2:10pm | IP Logged | 8 post reply

"Never happened.

"Ask people who know me if the tale as he relates it rings true."

I'm glad you isolated those two lines, JB.  Because to me, he contradicts himself right off the bat.  He says it never happened but then challenges the telling of the tale itself.  Which would mean there was a tale, but that it wasn't being recalled correctly in his opinion.

It's certainly a strange response from someone if they were never involved in a particular situation.

Too bad someone else who was there hasn't confirmed the story to support JB.  Larry Hama doubts it happened and posted as such and this whole thing has really illustrated to me just how much bickering and drama there must have been going on.

Wolfman, David, Shooter, etc., there are just so many heated stories and bad relationships from back in those days.  Trying to catch up on what happened back then is certainly disheartening for me.  As a fan, it's hard to break the image of the happy bullpen of artists and writers working together in the industry that we all love that letters pages and that sort of thing presented.  Innocence(ignorance?) of youth I guess.

I suppose art and ego are just too hard to separate.  Sometimes the conflict produces a great final product but it seems more often to just tear things apart.

Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 133742
Posted: 29 June 2011 at 4:19pm | IP Logged | 9 post reply

Larry Hama doubts it happened...

•••

What is the "it" Larry doubts? With all the back and forth and overlap in this thread, I have lost track.

Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 133742
Posted: 29 June 2011 at 4:21pm | IP Logged | 10 post reply

I'm not sure what the taxes have to do with this, but cumulatively I'm in a "bracket" of about 30%.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Andy Mokler
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 20 January 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 2799
Posted: 29 June 2011 at 4:33pm | IP Logged | 11 post reply

What is the "it" Larry doubts? With all the back and forth and overlap in this thread, I have lost track.

This is the opening sentence to his comment on the "throwing a punch" story: 

The Marvel bullpen applauding John Byrne?? I think not.

I took it as a snipe at you as well as agreeing with Shooter that the whole thing never happened.
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Eric Ladd
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 August 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 4504
Posted: 29 June 2011 at 5:03pm | IP Logged | 12 post reply

It looks like Larry Hama was not present at the incident in questions, but simply doubts the bullpen would ever applaud JB.

It's interesting the assumptions and opinions that "the fans" make regarding this story and the people involved. I had never encountered any "Byrne bashing" online nor had I ever found the "old stuff is better" opinion voiced. Reading the comments on Shooter's blog I have stumbled on those very obtuse and ignorant statements. I feel like a world traveler now having read there is someone out there that not only feels JB's older stuff is better, but attributes that high level of quality to Shooter's editor skills.

Call me dumbstruck by this comment:
"The work that John Byrne did under Jim Shooter at Marvel was the best of his career.

I cannot believe a comment like this could be made by someone that has kept up with JB's career, output and work from his X-Men days till now.
Back to Top profile | search
 

<< Prev Page of 20 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login