Perhaps you are misremembering the introduction I wrote, in which I noted that the exercise worked so well that one page ended with Sue walking down a flight of stairs in the Baxter Building, and the next pages (from several issues later) began with her walking down a flight of stairs in the Baxter Building.

So, by all mean, believe the "editorial text", since the editor in question was ME!"

••••••••

Oh, sorry for the misunderstanding, Mr. Byrne. I never owned that paperback.

Actually, I was referring to the editorial text provided as explanation on the Omnibus, where they took page 18 of issue # 242 out of its natural place and put it at the back of the book.

And since we are so fortunate to have you around, I don't know if you caught my question from my first post on this thread:

Why line reproduction looks so much worse (it looks like some shoddy, xerox copy on same pages) for issues 255-257? I seem to remember it was the same on the "Visionaries" paperback, so this must trace back to the source materials. While I own the original monthlies, I don't have them with me to compare, but, if memory serves me, these were not published during the much dreaded "flexographic" phase of Marvel, so why is there no better printing film or plates for these issues?