Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 6 Next >>
Topic: Invisible Plane (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Brian Hague
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 14 November 2006
Posts: 8515
Posted: 16 April 2011 at 8:49pm | IP Logged | 1  

Just as a side note, I now totally want to write the adventures of Forensic Pathologist Chimp...

"Oh, my God!! That Monkey has an electric saw!! And he's cutting up my little girl!! Stop him, somebody, for the love of God, STOP HIM!!"

"Take it easy, Mrs. Golterman. Your daughter Debbie is in the finest possible hands. And feet. If anyone can find who killed her, it's that chimp in there..."

 

Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Michael Andrew Gonoude
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 28 September 2005
Posts: 2785
Posted: 17 April 2011 at 12:11am | IP Logged | 2  

Of course, as Will Elder reminds us in the first two panels of this page, there was a perfectly valid reason (Yuh!  Yuh!) for that
 INVISO TEXT (Click or highlight to reveal):
invisible
plane

bill+elder.+woman+wonder.+page.+003.jpg



Edited by Michael Andrew Gonoude on 17 April 2011 at 11:24am
Back to Top profile | search
 
Thom Price
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar
L’Homme Diabolique

Joined: 29 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 7593
Posted: 17 April 2011 at 3:26am | IP Logged | 3  

That so many here cannot see the value and inventiveness of an invisible aircraft during a time of war knocks me for a bit of a loop.

***

I doubt there's anyone disputing the value of an invisible aircraft -- I'm pretty sure our military is spending billions trying to achieve just that.  The question here is mostly whether the jet is truly invisible -- and also renders the passenger(s) invisible -- or whether the jet is merely transparent.

The value of an invisible plane is obvious; the value of a transparent plane is a bit more dubious.


Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Peter Martin
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 17 March 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 16033
Posted: 17 April 2011 at 6:02am | IP Logged | 4  

Transparency would be useful, as it allows you to view in all directions from within the plane.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Jason Czeskleba
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 30 April 2004
Posts: 4652
Posted: 17 April 2011 at 6:13pm | IP Logged | 5  

Plus, a transparent plane looks cool.  I don't think it's intended to be any more complicated than that.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Tony Midyett
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 25 January 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 2834
Posted: 17 April 2011 at 9:18pm | IP Logged | 6  

Lynda Carter's TV WW plane appeared to be made of Lucite---definitely transparent, rather than invisible, but I'm pretty sure it was always meant to be literally invisible in the comics.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Michael Andrew Gonoude
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 28 September 2005
Posts: 2785
Posted: 18 April 2011 at 1:48am | IP Logged | 7  

Too bad Lynda never had occasion to change in HER plane...

Edited by Michael Andrew Gonoude on 18 April 2011 at 6:44pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Brian Hague
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 14 November 2006
Posts: 8515
Posted: 18 April 2011 at 5:52pm | IP Logged | 8  

I wonder if Tori Black changes outfits in her plane... Hmmm...

Here are a couple of shots of Lynda Carter flying her plane from the TV series...

Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Brian Hague
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 14 November 2006
Posts: 8515
Posted: 18 April 2011 at 6:17pm | IP Logged | 9  

Moulton's text switches back and forth between the phrases "silent transparent plane" and "silent invisible plane" in the issues of the comic that I can find. He also uses "voice-controlled" and "thought-controlled" interchangeably.He describes the plane as travelling 2000 miles per hour in one early issue.

In the origin story written for the robot plane in 1955, a few years after Moulton/ Marston's death, it is described as "... a means of locomotion so swift-- it will enable you to circle the globe in moments-- or flash through space at unheard of speeds!" Also, "... Silent-- Transparent-- Incredibly swift! A robot plane waiting to respond only to the voice of the person daring enough to win it! No one ever has!"

Following her mother's instructions, Wonder Woman finds the plane in three different sections, one under the ocean hidden in the petals of a giant carnivorous flower, the second high in a tree protected by a powerful electric current, and the third inside an active volcano. The Queen's instructions led her only to the first section. That first part had "something printed on" it.

The story truly raises far more questions than it answers. Who built the plane? Why was it then divided into three parts and placed in different parts of the world? As a challenge to assure that only the most worthy individual would fly it, perhaps? Fine, but then how long was it sitting unused? How did Hippolyte come by the written instructions to find the first section? Most importantly... How did Wonder Woman read something printed on the outside of an invisible plane??

All of this contradicts the few clues Moulton gave to the origin of the plane in Sensation Comics No. 8, wherein he states that Amazon technology is superior to that found in Man's World. "Our weapons are better- Our flying machines are further advanced!" I'm certain there were multiple origin tales for the plane written over the years, just as there were for her earrings, tiara, and costume. Still, it's a fun adventure... Nonsensical, but fun.

 

Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Jason Czeskleba
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 30 April 2004
Posts: 4652
Posted: 18 April 2011 at 6:36pm | IP Logged | 10  

I don't have a reprint of All Star #8 around right now to check, but my recollection is that in that story (Wonder Woman's debut) Queen Hippolyta simply says the Amazons built the plane.  That was certainly implied in the many stories written by Marston, that it was just another example of advanced Amazonian technology.  Kanigher's origin story of the plane sounds like typical Kanigher... "raises more questions than it answers" is Kanigher's trademark.

The fact that Marston uses "transparent" and "invisible" interchangeably leads me to believe that the plane was intended to be "invisible" only in the same sense as this tape:



Edited by Jason Czeskleba on 18 April 2011 at 6:37pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Brian Hague
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 14 November 2006
Posts: 8515
Posted: 18 April 2011 at 6:42pm | IP Logged | 11  

Ah, so the plane's origin may in fact be Scottish... James Doohan used to say the Scots had a wonderful tradition of engineering... :-)

 

Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Monte Gruhlke
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 03 May 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 3303
Posted: 18 April 2011 at 6:56pm | IP Logged | 12  

Mr. Scott? Well that explains everything; the plane is made from transparent aluminum.
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 

<< Prev Page of 6 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login