Posted: 29 March 2011 at 5:07pm | IP Logged | 4
|
|
|
So, this topic has me looking at the run again, and lamenting what might have been. It also got me thinking-- JB planned on bringing back a Hulk who really hadn't been seen since the original 60s run. Some would argue that was a "finding" period for the character, and that the savage, "Hulk Smash!" version is the real deal (and they'd have a point, since that version was around for a solid 20 years or so). I love 'em both--I grew up with back issues featuring the classic savage Hulk, but I also fell totally in love with the original six issues when I got the Marvel Masterworks volume as a kid. Both versions have a lot of interesting dramatic meat to them. 1. The early Hulk works well, because Banner is a very prominent figure, rather than being the boring guy we just want to see Hulk-Out. The early Banner wanted to play superhero, basically--he thought he could control this primal power and use it for mankind's benefit. Of course, the Hulk's innate brutality would peek out from time to time. It appears that the Hulk is inherently a creature of rage, even under circumstances when Banner is seemingly in control. One problem of this version (which I'm sure JB had an answer for) is that the Hulk was tied to a specific location--he needed the gamma ray machine in the cave to change back and forth. That limited story possibilities somewhat. 2. The classic "Hulk smash!" version had a somewhat more flexible format--Banner turns into the Hulk, a savage monster with his own personality and memories--when he gets angry or excited. Of course, the TV version followed this formula. With this version, the Hulk is truly a menace, and Banner's goal is to be cured, rather than to control the power. There's also a lot of nice, allegorical content--Banner's like an alcoholic who can only vaguely remember what he's done while "intoxicated", and his struggle to maintain control and not turn into the Hulk makes one think about the unhealthy repression of anger. There's also the nice (unintentional?) notion that Banner cannot fully express his emotions (for fear of becoming the Hulk), while the Hulk can't find the peace he seeks (or else he'll turn back into Banner and cease to exist). Certainly, we got many years of stories from # 2 (and the TV series, which was virtually the same, at its core), but I still think there's a lot of potential to be mined from #1. If only, JB, if only--! And, of course, Peter David reaped the rewards of JB's set-up, using a number of the same ideas (Banner--under the Hulk's subconscious influence--willingly becoming the Hulk again to deal with a menace, etc.), but he took the psychology of the character in a very different direction, using Mantlo's childhood abuse angle (which JB apparently ignored) as a starting point. JB's Hulk seems much in line with Lee and Kirby's original--the Hulk is a separate being formed out of Banner's rage--different from Banner, yet still connected. Thus, even when Banner is seemingly in control of the Hulk, the Hulk's innate rage is in there, waiting to burst out. David, of course, slowly developed the MPD angle, and, although the early gray Hulk of his run superficially resembles the "angry Banner" version of the original run (in that he talks like a thug, etc.--and David later retconned the early "angry Banner" version into the gray Hulk persona asserting its dominance), the gray Hulk is essentially Banner's nasty, crude teenage emotions given its own persona, whereas the classic green Hulk was the raging inner child. All things considered, I really like Lee and Kirby's original version (with Banner trying to stay in control, but his inner rage bubbling out), but the classic savage version is a formula that really worked for a long time. So hard to choose a favorite!
Edited by Greg Kirkman on 29 March 2011 at 5:12pm
|