Posted: 04 March 2011 at 2:52pm | IP Logged | 8
|
|
|
I haven't read many DC stories over the last 8 or 9 years. To be honest, whenever I read articles about Superboy-Prime punching walls of reality and multiple earths and links to a story from over 20 years ago, I find it boring. It's semantics and doesn't appeal to me. I'd much rather read a standalone story, including an "imaginary tale", than several issues about continuity, multiple earths, etc. I mean, will they do stories about the Crisis in years to come? I have no problem with anybody who enjoys such stories (you can even enjoy them solely for the art, I guess), but it holds no appeal for me. Getting back to "imaginary stories", I know it's not quite the same thing, but I used to write quite a bit of THE A-TEAM and KNIGHT RIDER fan fiction, for my own enjoyment, only. The TV episodes of THE A-TEAM and KNIGHT RIDER were all the "real" adventures of the characters and my fan fiction would be considered "imaginary stories". The stories I wrote featured stuff that could never happen in the TV episodes such as characters dying, sworn enemies forming alliances with the heroes, etc. Were they enjoyable? It's not for me to say, some people I showed them to enjoyed them. So, I guess my point is that "imaginary stories" are underrated because they allow for much creativity and the possibilities are endless, ranging from a villain reforming and becoming a hero, characters getting married, a character dying and being replaced, etc. Such concepts, in my opinion, belong in "imaginary stories" rather than in the "real adventures" of Spider-Man, Batman, Superman, etc. In a nutshell, "imaginary stories" were FUN. That's why I started reading comics. Reading stories about semantics and reading explanations of multiple earths and crossovers doesn't appeal to me as much as a Batman/Batwoman marriage (BATMAN #122) or Superman-Blue and Superman-Red marrying Lana Lang and Lois Lane and starting familes (SUPERMAN #162), all "imaginary stories" and a lot of fun.
|