Posted: 15 January 2005 at 10:34am | IP Logged | 12
|
|
|
Sam Karns wrote:
Could anyone break down what was wrong with the Batman films and discuss what was right with them?
You may include the serials as well thru Batman & Robin.
|
|
|
I know you asked for a few thoughts, but here is an interesting (I think) tidbit:
If you read the original version of Sam Hamm's screenplay from 1986 it is pretty similar, but is a lot better than the finished film. For one it makes Bruce and the Joker both the same age explains a lot more of Bruce's back ground, and why he becomes Batman, and does not make the Joker his parents' killer.
Knox is killed in this version, and is more sinister than he appears in the movie as he learns Bruce's secret before Vicki, (note Alfred does not show Vicki in to the cave in this one, she puts it together herself examining Bruce's back ground, and through her encounters with Batman) and is determined to expose Bruce to Gotham as Batman.
Bruce has a bigger friendship with Gordon and Harvey Dent in this version.
Robin appears in the last half after the Joker has killed his parents in much the same way as Two Face does in Forever.
I believe the above were all taken out of Hamm's screenplay by Tim Burton, Warren Skaaren and Charles McKeown as they felt that making the Joker his parents killer gave the plot a nice symmetry.
Plus Batman has less screentime in the 1989 version due to Nicholson being cast and having his part expanded.
What was right was:
Burton got the tone for the film right in the first one, but Keaton was no Bruce Wayne or Batman. It bugged me that he found time to pump up to Schwaeznegger size for a dud of a movie like Desperate Measures, but didn't bother for Batman.
The big problem with Batman and Returns is that the villains take over the movie, and Batman becomes a secondary character and a result less interesting.
Plus Catwoman was portrayed as a victim constantly in Returns, and the Penguin should have been Killer Croc instead of the Penguin ( a case of in name only ) as it seemed the origin given: the Circus background and living in the sewers was closer to Croc.
It was also a bit too much of Burton getting his own way, and as a result it looked like Batman in the world of Edward Scissorhands.
Forever I didn't mind as much as I liked Kilmer as the character. O'Donnell too old for Robin, and Jones and Carrey far too over the top. I can watch it on a no-brainer fun level to pass 2 hours.
At least Batman seemed to work a little more with Gordon, and appeared to do a little detective work.
Another interesting point, read the Peter David novel of the film based on Lee and Janet Batchler's original screenplay before Schumacher and Akiva Goldsman re-wrote it.
It explains more about what was in Bruce's father's diary, the images of the giant bat, why Edward Nygma was obsessed with Bruce Wayne from his child hood, and Dent's scarring in more detail and the event s leading up to it.
In the court scene Bruce is in disguise to watch the Moroni trial. Two-Face comes across as being more sinister and a serious threat in the book, as does the Riddler.
I read in an interview that Jones delivered a lot of the lines the Batchlers wrote, but they were disappointed he took a campy approach to it, and did not portray it in the original and more serious way they imagined it.
As for Batman & Robin??? AAAARRRRGHHH!!!
THAT WAS 2 HOURS OF MY LIFE FROM 1997 I CAN NEVER GET BACK.
Edited by Greg McPhee on 15 January 2005 at 10:35am
|