Sean wrote:
Of course! Some of the older stuff is better. And some of the newer stuff
is better. And yes, permissiveness in terms of language and subject
matter has changed, and that's led to some stuff that — to my well-over-
30 eyes — seems odd. It's also led to some pretty obnoxious storylines,
from what I hear. But isn't that as it ever was?
If I had grown up in the 60s reading X-Men and you'd have told me that
Marvel Girl would someday have a different name and different powers
and be a bad guy and be depicted dressed as a dominatrix on the cover of
a comic, I could reasonably be very taken aback. But as a kid, X-Men 134
was one of my first Marvel comics, and I just though "this is great!"
Were standards different? Yes. Were the creators depraved, or
inappropriate, or wrong by the day's standards? I don't think so. Should
they have been taken to task because they were implicitly saying that Lee
and Kirby got it wrong? No. But I bet if I'd have shown my grandma that
comic, she wouldn't have let me read it.
And to be clear, I actually agree with a lot of the specific complaints about
comics voiced here. It's the blanket "everything new is worse because it's
not like it was when I was a kid" statements that I take issue with. In part
because that's not true, and in part because a lot of what people perceive
as being "new" isn't all that new at all. A lot of it is just new as it pertains
to an individual.
***********************
Sean, I have to start by saying that I respect your opinion and POV. In fact I agree with much of it. I too often caution people about looking at the past with rose colored glasses.
You also make a valid point about things always changing, Comics and characters in the 70's were very different from the 60's.
having said that, I feel compelled to say that I do think there is a BIG difference between what is happening today and the "changes" in the past.
While you are right that Jean Grey was very different by issue 134 of the x-men, that change was a progressive change which took place slowly over the years.
Much the same way Peter parker was no longer a teenager by the late 70's, so too had Jean Grey grown into a woman who went through an experience which affected her abilities, personality, and outfit. She was the same Jean Grey.
That is not what is happening today.
Today's Modern writers and artists approach is to simply envision what THEY perceive the character to be and to present them as such. Those views often come from a cursory knowledge of said character or worst yet, their perception of a character. As a result, Sometimes, those changes aren't just sudden, then completely contradict what came before, without any progression or explanation.
I don't think the complaint is just about whether comics today are "good" or "bad". I think the issues is that they A) have no respect for the characters B) Have no respect for the creators (with the need to "fix" what came before) and C) are so dark, brooding, bloody and outrageous that they are no longer for everyone, certainly not children. Genius or not, if what you are looking for is light entertainment, and I don't know why else one would be interested in a genre about people in tights with super powers, then comics today are no longer for you.
by the way, I 'm sure you know this already but by "light" I do not mean weak, or less then by any stretch of the imagination. I just mean enjoyable by all