Author |
|
Kevin Hagerman Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 15 April 2005 Location: United States Posts: 18032
|
Posted: 02 November 2010 at 9:55am | IP Logged | 1
|
|
|
I don't think they will. And I hope I am wrong.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
John Byrne
Grumpy Old Guy
Joined: 11 May 2005 Posts: 133324
|
Posted: 02 November 2010 at 10:05am | IP Logged | 2
|
|
|
…is there anyone engaged in this discussion who actually believes that comicbooks printed on paper will ever be a growing business again?•• I think they COULD be, but that, so far as I can tell, virtually nothing is really being done that would help this happen.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Martin Redmond Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 27 June 2006 Posts: 3882
|
Posted: 02 November 2010 at 10:11am | IP Logged | 3
|
|
|
If they ran an ad on TV for the printed comics in the middle of the same comic's cartoon show, I'm sure it'd boost sales. In the places that carry newsstand edition comics anyway.
Edited by Martin Redmond on 02 November 2010 at 10:12am
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Rick Whiting Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 22 April 2004 Posts: 2214
|
Posted: 02 November 2010 at 10:20am | IP Logged | 4
|
|
|
Here's a quote from Joe Quesada and Axel Alonso about why they allow certain things in their books in regards to appropriate or inappropriate content.A fan who works at a comic shop asked after how Marvel set the standard for their rating system, wondering why some books for kids seemed to have content that was over the line. "Like any grading system, it's always going to be objective. What one person finds mild, another will find way over the top. It's always hard to judge," Quesada said, noting that even on bigger media outlets like cable TV channels work in a wide range of subject matter depending on who owned them and how they saw their audience. Alonso said one staffer is hired at Marvel to read each book objectively without having been in on the creation of the books, so that editors could only discuss issues of standards once the core of the creative process was done. "This is art, so we don't want to make it like an assembly line," he said. "Once you say 'You can't do this' it sucks the creative life out of the room." Says a lot about the mentality of the current editorial regime at Marvel. Here's the link to the full whole article. http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=28797
Edited by Rick Whiting on 02 November 2010 at 10:24am
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Bill Mimbu Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 14 April 2008 Location: United States Posts: 7368
|
Posted: 02 November 2010 at 10:20am | IP Logged | 5
|
|
|
This is all sounds like a "Bizarro-version" of Borg, where the goal of assimilating new fans always ends up just recycling the old ones...
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Greg Woronchak Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 04 September 2007 Location: Canada Posts: 1631
|
Posted: 02 November 2010 at 10:20am | IP Logged | 6
|
|
|
is there anyone engaged in this discussion who actually believes that comicbooks printed on paper will ever be a growing business again?
I look at Harry Potter and Twilight as examples of concepts that captured the imagination of across-the-board demographics, and built rabid fan bases. I realize it's comparing apples and oranges, but I believe that an appealling concept, properly marketed, and easily available to new readers could catch lightning in a bottle.
The current attitude of the Big Two precludes any growth! It's trying the same tricks over and over, and throwing heaps of manure at the wall (although pretentious and professionally colored), desperately hoping something sticks.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
| www
e-mail
|
|
John Byrne
Grumpy Old Guy
Joined: 11 May 2005 Posts: 133324
|
Posted: 02 November 2010 at 10:23am | IP Logged | 7
|
|
|
I look at Harry Potter and Twilight as examples of concepts that captured the imagination of across-the-board demographics, and built rabid fan bases. I realize it's comparing apples and oranges, but I believe that an appealling concept, properly marketed, and easily available to new readers could catch lightning in a bottle.•• It's not apples and oranges at all! Harry and the Teen Vamps are classic comicbook material. What are they, in fact, if not variations on the X-Men? The difference lies in them being sold in real book stores, to mass audiences, rather than being deliberately squirreled away in out of the corner shops that require effort to reach.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Sean Blythe Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 13 July 2006 Location: United States Posts: 342
|
Posted: 02 November 2010 at 10:24am | IP Logged | 8
|
|
|
Like any grading system, it's always going to be objective. What one person finds mild, another will find way over the top. Either Queseda was misquoted, or "objective" doesn't mean what he thinks it means.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
John Byrne
Grumpy Old Guy
Joined: 11 May 2005 Posts: 133324
|
Posted: 02 November 2010 at 10:26am | IP Logged | 9
|
|
|
"This is art, so we don't want to make it like an assembly line," (Quesada) said.•• What a pity Jack Kirby never produced any art.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Mark Haslett Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 19 April 2004 Location: United States Posts: 6427
|
Posted: 02 November 2010 at 10:28am | IP Logged | 10
|
|
|
Mark: Have you heard of "first look deals" and "vanity shingles" and "pay or play offers"? The studios do indeed pay top talent for a ton of material that never sees the light of day. It's part of their system.---- Nathan: It's part of their development process. I see nothing wrong there... *** I agree with you-- I think you misunderstood my post. I'm not criticising Hollywood. I'm saying that comparing comic production to Hollywood production isn't a good idea. We shouldn't want comics made the way they make movies. Studio development is fine for creating studio films. But when studio's chase the top talent in the field, they end up paying that talent for lots of stuff that never quite pays off. That's just part of the game when dealing with that top 3% of the talent pool. Emulating that process to develop comic books would be stupid-- yet it seems like what Marvel and DC are doing more and more of.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Keith Thomas Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 06 April 2009 Location: United States Posts: 3082
|
Posted: 02 November 2010 at 11:19am | IP Logged | 11
|
|
|
I'm not saying this to be snarky or contentious -- I really want to know: is there anyone engaged in this discussion who actually believes that comicbooks printed on paper will ever be a growing business again? Look at Japanese manga in the US. I remember when I first got into it I had to find people on the internet (on newsgroups, remember those?) who made trips to Japan and sold used copies. Now bookstores have a whole aisle dedicated to them, I never dreamed I would have seen that. Since a lot of US comics sales are trade paperbacks maybe they just need to switch formats and sell like manga. Sell monthly B&W compilation books then collect the individual series in trades, printed on better paper and maybe in color (though with how bad modern coloring ruins pencils I'd say leave it B&W).
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Dan Avenell Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 06 March 2008 Posts: 1038
|
Posted: 02 November 2010 at 11:42am | IP Logged | 12
|
|
|
In the 'good old days' a typical comic was half ads, aimed at kids. I can't remember but modern Marvel seem to have far fewer ads (am I wrong?) and collected trades have none. Surely there are still lots of companies that want to reach the target market of kids and teens - ads for print media are still much better paid than any kind of internet advertising. Hence potential lower cover price - plus kids like the ads if they are aimed at them.
Of course, the advertisers would pay more to reach a wider audience. Which is why getting them back in local shops and in more newstands, in some format, where many other periodicals still and will continue to be sold, would be something to aim for.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|