Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 22 Next >>
Topic: Here’s why Marvel won’t listen to us (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Kevin Hagerman
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 15 April 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 18032
Posted: 02 November 2010 at 9:55am | IP Logged | 1  

I don't think they will.  And I hope I am wrong.
Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 133324
Posted: 02 November 2010 at 10:05am | IP Logged | 2  

…is there anyone engaged in this discussion who actually believes that comicbooks printed on paper will ever be a growing business again?

••

I think they COULD be, but that, so far as I can tell, virtually nothing is really being done that would help this happen.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Martin Redmond
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 27 June 2006
Posts: 3882
Posted: 02 November 2010 at 10:11am | IP Logged | 3  

If they ran an ad on TV for the printed comics in the middle of the same comic's cartoon show, I'm sure it'd boost sales. In the places that carry newsstand edition comics anyway.



Edited by Martin Redmond on 02 November 2010 at 10:12am
Back to Top profile | search
 
Rick Whiting
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 22 April 2004
Posts: 2214
Posted: 02 November 2010 at 10:20am | IP Logged | 4  

Here's a quote from Joe Quesada and Axel Alonso about why they allow certain things in their books in regards to appropriate or inappropriate content.

A fan who works at a comic shop asked after how Marvel set the standard for their rating system, wondering why some books for kids seemed to have content that was over the line. "Like any grading system, it's always going to be objective. What one person finds mild, another will find way over the top. It's always hard to judge," Quesada said, noting that even on bigger media outlets like cable TV channels work in a wide range of subject matter depending on who owned them and how they saw their audience. Alonso said one staffer is hired at Marvel to read each book objectively without having been in on the creation of the books, so that editors could only discuss issues of standards once the core of the creative process was done. "This is art, so we don't want to make it like an assembly line," he said. "Once you say 'You can't do this' it sucks the creative life out of the room."

Says a lot about the mentality of the current editorial regime at Marvel.

Here's the link to the full whole article.

http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=28797

Edited by Rick Whiting on 02 November 2010 at 10:24am

Back to Top profile | search
 
Bill Mimbu
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 14 April 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 7368
Posted: 02 November 2010 at 10:20am | IP Logged | 5  

This is all sounds like a "Bizarro-version" of Borg, where the goal of assimilating new fans always ends up just recycling the old ones...
Back to Top profile | search
 
Greg Woronchak
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 04 September 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 1631
Posted: 02 November 2010 at 10:20am | IP Logged | 6  

is there anyone engaged in this discussion who actually believes that
comicbooks printed on paper will ever be a growing business again?

I look at Harry Potter and Twilight as examples of concepts that captured the imagination of across-the-board demographics, and built rabid fan bases. I realize it's comparing apples and oranges, but I believe that an appealling concept, properly marketed, and easily available to new readers could catch lightning in a bottle.

The current attitude of the Big Two precludes any growth! It's trying the same tricks over and over, and throwing heaps of manure at the wall (although pretentious and professionally colored), desperately hoping something sticks.

Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 133324
Posted: 02 November 2010 at 10:23am | IP Logged | 7  

I look at Harry Potter and Twilight as examples of concepts that captured the imagination of across-the-board demographics, and built rabid fan bases. I realize it's comparing apples and oranges, but I believe that an appealling concept, properly marketed, and easily available to new readers could catch lightning in a bottle.

••

It's not apples and oranges at all! Harry and the Teen Vamps are classic comicbook material. What are they, in fact, if not variations on the X-Men?

The difference lies in them being sold in real book stores, to mass audiences, rather than being deliberately squirreled away in out of the corner shops that require effort to reach.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Sean Blythe
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 13 July 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 342
Posted: 02 November 2010 at 10:24am | IP Logged | 8  

Like any grading system, it's always going to be objective. What one
person finds mild, another will find way over the top.

Either Queseda was misquoted, or "objective" doesn't mean what he thinks it
means.

Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 133324
Posted: 02 November 2010 at 10:26am | IP Logged | 9  

"This is art, so we don't want to make it like an assembly line," (Quesada) said.

••

What a pity Jack Kirby never produced any art.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Mark Haslett
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 6427
Posted: 02 November 2010 at 10:28am | IP Logged | 10  

Mark: Have you heard of "first look deals" and "vanity shingles" and "pay
or play offers"? The studios do indeed pay top talent for a ton of material
that never sees the light of day. It's part of their system.

----

Nathan: It's part of their development process. I see nothing wrong
there...

***

I agree with you-- I think you misunderstood my post. I'm not criticising
Hollywood. I'm saying that comparing comic production to Hollywood
production isn't a good idea. We shouldn't want comics made the way
they make movies.

Studio development is fine for creating studio films. But when studio's
chase the top talent in the field, they end up paying that talent for lots of
stuff that never quite pays off. That's just part of the game when dealing
with that top 3% of the talent pool.

Emulating that process to develop comic books would be stupid-- yet it
seems like what Marvel and DC are doing more and more of.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Keith Thomas
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 06 April 2009
Location: United States
Posts: 3082
Posted: 02 November 2010 at 11:19am | IP Logged | 11  

I'm not saying this to be snarky or contentious -- I really want to know: is
there anyone engaged in this discussion who actually believes that
comicbooks printed on paper will ever be a growing business again?

 

Look at Japanese manga in the US. I remember when I first got into it I had to find people on the internet (on newsgroups, remember those?) who made trips to Japan and sold used copies. Now bookstores have a whole aisle dedicated to them, I never dreamed I would have seen that.

Since a lot of US comics sales are trade paperbacks maybe they just need to switch formats and sell like manga. Sell monthly B&W compilation books then collect the individual series in trades, printed on better paper and maybe in color (though with how bad modern coloring ruins pencils I'd say leave it B&W).

Back to Top profile | search
 
Dan Avenell
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 06 March 2008
Posts: 1038
Posted: 02 November 2010 at 11:42am | IP Logged | 12  

In the 'good old days' a typical comic was half ads, aimed at kids. I can't remember but modern Marvel seem to have far fewer ads (am I wrong?) and collected trades have none.  Surely there are still lots of companies that want to reach the target market of kids and teens - ads for print media are still much better paid than any kind of internet advertising. Hence potential lower cover price - plus kids like the ads if they are aimed at them.

Of course, the advertisers would pay more to reach a wider audience. Which is why getting them back in local shops and in more newstands, in some format, where many other periodicals still and will continue to be sold, would be something to aim for.

Back to Top profile | search
 

<< Prev Page of 22 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login