Both - she now wears a version of the black / white Spider-Woman costrume

Edit: Beat me to it

I just flipped through the issue today, and when I saw that, I immediately put it down.

I am a huge Hogboglin (Kingsley) fan.  It was one of the BIG things in comics when I first started reading.  I was so happy when Stern came back and did Hobgoblin Lives which restored the character to his full glory.  Then I start this issue, and Hobby is doing things he just would not do under Stern.  Firing automatic somehow Kingsley is turned into a complete putz.  He doesn't sound like him; he doesn't act like; and most importantly he falls to a ridiculous nobody loser.  This guy, who fought Spider-Man to a standstill for years (and who won some minor battles) is undone by some bizarre sonic scream and gets his head cut off?

Lame.

Why even bring back Hobgoblin if it's not going to be the Hobgoblin?

To Fred: who are you Fred? De Falco's lawyer? We're talking about comics here, not national security... Who cares what he said exactly. He probably thinks what I think 'cept he can't say it out loud.

------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------

I'm kinda glad the new Hobgoblin is NOT Kingsley. To me Kingsley was resurrected by De Falco during his tenure on the late great Spider-Girl. May he rest in Mayday's futureverse and a fond memory of what the one TRUE Hobgoblin really was.

Slott's very respectful of past characters and previous continuity. I would be shocked if the Kingsley Hogbolin is actually dead, especially, as others have pointed out, since the character has a history of faking his death by switching his place with that of another (and we never saw under the Hobgoblin's mask, in the two issues which he appeared).

Also excited to see Tom DeFalco's Phil Urich again. Fun character. It's been far too long.

>To Fred: who are you Fred? De Falco's lawyer?

Nope. I am clear who I am and it's becoming clear that you are symptomatic of the mindset and actions that have made the online comic community such an unhealthy and irresponsible place. Thanks for clarifying.

>We're talking about comics here, not national security... Who cares what he said exactly. He probably thinks what I think 'cept he can't say it out loud.

You were not talking about comics. You were making statements  regarding DeFalco's words. A very big difference there. I'd imagine he cares what responses are being attributed to him. I'm thinking of a number between 1 and 50, wanna tell me what it is and then spread it around?

••

Wasn't it Slott who had She-Hulk having a sexual relationship with the Juggernaut?

______________________________

No, that was Chuck Austen during his terrible Uncanny X-Men run. Austen also wrote that issue of Action Comics where a Kryptonian villain raped a woman to death (it was strongly implied through dialogue and a panel where the bad guy emerged from his tent with the woman's blood all over his costume).

Edited by Rick Whiting on 27 November 2010 at 12:50pm