Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 21 Next >>
Topic: Bring back the yellow oval! (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Brian Miller
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 28 July 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 31284
Posted: 31 July 2010 at 6:02am | IP Logged | 1  

lets get back the real utility belt

*************

I'm pro this as well.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Don Bohm
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 323
Posted: 31 July 2010 at 6:22am | IP Logged | 2  

Ya, Miller's explanation about the oval was way overthinking things.
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Al Cook
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 December 2004
Posts: 12736
Posted: 31 July 2010 at 7:14am | IP Logged | 3  

Leave it off.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Michael Andrew Gonoude
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 28 September 2005
Posts: 2785
Posted: 31 July 2010 at 7:29am | IP Logged | 4  

I am conflicted: on the one hand I pretty much grew up with the oval; on the other hand, when it disappeared, I was kinda glad, from an aesthetic point of view.  But now, nostalgically speaking, I do miss it.

JB: "How many of the hoods in Gotham do you reckon are marksmen? How many, with the Batman bearing down on them, would really take the trouble to aim? And how many, if they did, would aim at his heart, rather than, say, the lower half of his face -- the only part of his body they KNOW isn't armored?"

They wouldn't take the trouble to aim; it's more of an unconscious action.  Psychologically-trained Batman is counting on their eyes being drawn to that yellow oval - the criminals' mindseyes take in this massive dark shape - with this one, glaring bright spot.  The lower half of the face isn't a kill shot.  Even at a quick glance, the oval is seen as centrally-located -- and that's heart territory, a much higher percentage for a successful kill shot.  Without taking time to think and consciously aim, they instinctively home in on the oval, desperately squeeze off a shot (or burst, if it's a machine gun), and, by the time they collect themselves enough to actually direct their next shot to where it'll do some good (well, bad, really), it's too late -- the Batman is already upon them...

Of course, the first time Batman runs into an armed, evil psychologist-marksman, he's so screwed...

 

Back to Top profile | search
 
Brian Hunt
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 5178
Posted: 31 July 2010 at 7:37am | IP Logged | 5  

How many of the hoods in Gotham do you reckon are marksmen? How many, with the Batman bearing down on them, would really take the trouble to aim? And how many, if they did, would aim at his heart, rather than, say, the lower half of his face -- the only part of his body they KNOW isn't armored?

Anyone that undergoes any sort of firearms training would be taught to target center mass. That's the easiest part of the body to hit. Heads and arms move too much and are unreliable targets when things get hectic. 
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Brian Hunt
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 5178
Posted: 31 July 2010 at 7:37am | IP Logged | 6  

I too, shall pass on the oval.
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Jamal Washington
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 March 2009
Posts: 82
Posted: 31 July 2010 at 7:54am | IP Logged | 7  

I don't care either way...it's still Batman, especially with something like the oval being removed is a very small change.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Paulo Pereira
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 24 April 2006
Posts: 15539
Posted: 31 July 2010 at 10:38am | IP Logged | 8  

No-val.
Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 133555
Posted: 31 July 2010 at 10:57am | IP Logged | 9  

The irony is, DC added the oval to make the chest emblem into something more specific, so they could trademark it -- but all they really succeeded in doing was making it easier to do knockoffs!

If most people see a bat, they don't automatically think "Batman". But if they see just about any variant on the oval version, they do. For instance, after the first Tim Burton movie came out, I was at a local crafts fair, where one booth was offering a little item that looked sorta like this:

I hung around the booth for a while, and didn't hear anybody asking what it was. Kids, adults, you name it -- they all saw it and said "Batman!"

Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 133555
Posted: 31 July 2010 at 10:59am | IP Logged | 10  

"How many of the hoods in Gotham do you reckon are marksmen? How many, with the Batman bearing down on them, would really take the trouble to aim? And how many, if they did, would aim at his heart, rather than, say, the lower half of his face -- the only part of his body they KNOW isn't armored?"

They wouldn't take the trouble to aim; it's more of an unconscious action. Psychologically-trained Batman is counting on their eyes being drawn to that yellow oval - the criminals' mindseyes take in this massive dark shape - with this one, glaring bright spot. The lower half of the face isn't a kill shot. Even at a quick glance, the oval is seen as centrally-located -- and that's heart territory, a much higher percentage for a successful kill shot. Without taking time to think and consciously aim, they instinctively home in on the oval, desperately squeeze off a shot (or burst, if it's a machine gun), and, by the time they collect themselves enough to actually direct their next shot to where it'll do some good (well, bad, really), it's too late -- the Batman is already upon them...

••

Back to Top profile | search
 
Joe Hollon
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 08 May 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 13704
Posted: 31 July 2010 at 11:04am | IP Logged | 11  

I can take it or leave it.  I guess most of the Batman comics I think of fondly feature him WITH the oval so I'll give that a slight edge over the non-oval.


Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Jason Czeskleba
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 30 April 2004
Posts: 4649
Posted: 31 July 2010 at 11:11am | IP Logged | 12  

 Dan Bohm wrote:
Ya, Miller's explanation about the oval was way overthinking things.


The notion that Batman wears body armor period is way overthinking things.

The period when Batman had the oval (at least, the first 15 or so years) was one of the best periods in his history, story-wise.  I guess that's part of the reason I'm fond of it.  I'd be happy though if they simply brought back the character that wore the oval.
Back to Top profile | search
 

<< Prev Page of 21 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login