Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 50 Next >>
Topic: OT: Texas mayor shoots daughter, then herself... (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Scott Daggett
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 26 February 2008
Posts: 837
Posted: 16 July 2010 at 8:40am | IP Logged | 1  

Why are we beating a dead horse with the gun issue.  These murder/suicides could have been performed with a knife.  Don't any of you ever get tired of beating this dead horse. 

Firearms are ingrained in American society.  America was freed from English oppression by citizens and their firearms.  They are not going away, at least not in our lifetime. 

Just imagine if our forefathers thought along the same lines that most of you think today regarding guns in the home.  We would still be a British colony!

It will be a cold day in hell when anyone tries to take my firearms away.  I think I earned that right as an Army veteran to keep and bear arms.  Mind you, I do not mean that I would want to own assault rifles.  All I want to do is keep and maintain what I currently own, a couple of handguns, shotguns and hunting rifles with the desire to purchase a few more of the same type of firearms.  If I were a serious competitive shooter then maybe I would want to own an assault type rifle but I am not.

Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 134709
Posted: 16 July 2010 at 8:42am | IP Logged | 2  

Why are we beating a dead horse with the gun issue. These murder/suicides could have been performed with a knife. Don't any of you ever get tired of beating this dead horse.

Firearms are ingrained in American society. America was freed from English oppression by citizens and their firearms. They are not going away, at least not in our lifetime.

Just imagine if our forefathers thought along the same lines that most of you think today regarding guns in the home. We would still be a British colony!

••

And we'd still own slaves! Hey! How did we let go of THAT great idea! It was what our Founding Fathers believed in! Better bring it back before the country goes to hell!

Dibs on Halle Berry.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Stephen Robinson
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 5833
Posted: 16 July 2010 at 9:03am | IP Logged | 3  

Why are we beating a dead horse with the gun issue. Thesemurder/suicides could have been performed with a knife. Don't any ofyou ever get tired of beating this dead horse.

*************

SER: They could not have been performed as successfully with a knife. The close contact required would have given the daughter a fighting chance -- and then it would have been a 55-year-old woman versus a 19-year-old woman. The odds for survival were much greater. Not to mention that a gun allows you to kill someone before you've even thought about it. It's almost instantaneous. A knife would have been not just a struggle but would have given time for the mother to possibly regret or reconsider her actions.

**************
Firearms are ingrained in American society. America was freed fromEnglish oppression by citizens and their firearms. They are not goingaway, at least not in our lifetime.

**********

SER: Yes, but we are saying that it's a negative that firearms were ingrained in American society.

The colonists formed an *army* using weapons against an oppressor. We already have a standing army. We already have a police force.

*************
Just imagine if our forefathers thought along the same lines that mostof you think today regarding guns in the home. We would still be aBritish colony!

****************

SER: Highly unlikely. I think it's also grossly disingenious to compare the firearms of the 18th Century to the firearms of today. In many ways, it's like referring to a Star Trek phaser as a "hand gun."

The chances of a child killing another child accidentally with an 18th Century gun were miniscule (even if the child could actually operate it).

Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Michael Huber
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 27 August 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 3338
Posted: 16 July 2010 at 9:23am | IP Logged | 4  

Why are we beating a dead horse with the gun issue.  These murder/suicides could have been performed with a knife.  Don't any of you ever get tired of beating this dead horse. 

Anyone remember the mother that drowned all 3(4?) of her kids? Them dang modern plumbing luxuries are dangerous too.

I've said it before, it's a great planet, people, all kinds, none are exempt, screw it up.

JB, throwing slavery on a gun arguement is way off point and like throwing gas on a fire. Why do it?

Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 134709
Posted: 16 July 2010 at 9:33am | IP Logged | 5  

JB, throwing slavery on a gun arguement is way off point and like throwing gas on a fire. Why do it?

••

Because it is exactly ON point, much as the gun-toters would wish to make it otherwise. Slavery was a "cherished tradition" in this country for hundreds of years, and it was not imagined how it could ever be abolished without bringing ruin on our heads. And yet, here we are.

Any time you want to talk about what the Founding Fathers believed in, you have to take the whole package, not just the bits you like. And you have to remember that they wrote the Constitution to include a mechanism by which it could be occasionally rebooted, as time and circumstance made necessary. Like giving freedom to the slaves, votes to women, etc.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Michael Huber
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 27 August 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 3338
Posted: 16 July 2010 at 9:45am | IP Logged | 6  

But we are talking about the Constitution and America. Slavery was world wide and chief among those that enabled it were the very country men of those that were sold into slavery itself. I feel your point is tantamaount to " He likes guns, he must be for slavery", and correct assumption on my part or not, people will jump all over it. It's simply inflammatory. No one's going to ammend the constitution and bring back slavery.

Any time you want to talk about what the Founding Fathers believed in, you have to take the whole package, not just the bits you like.

From this point I get you favor throwing the whole document out, because  clearly it's founders were flawed.

 

Back to Top profile | search
 
Michael Huber
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 27 August 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 3338
Posted: 16 July 2010 at 9:46am | IP Logged | 7  

The very fact it CAN be ammended shows that the founders were aware they weren't perfect.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Kurtis J. Evans
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 18 June 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 133
Posted: 16 July 2010 at 9:46am | IP Logged | 8  

I tend to believe that any law which cannot be enforced is a bad law.  

Think about how many people are opposed to the use of illicit drugs, and yet the US government has wasted billions upon billions of dollars fighting the drug war.  

Then consider how many people are in favor of guns -- if they were ever banned, then gun-running would become an unstoppable national epidemic in the US.  

It's just a no-win situation, because gun rights are deeply ingrained in the consciousness of most US citizens, but guns themselves can be so terribly damaging.  So, as with the illicit drug industry, maybe it'd be better to legalize guns and regulate the holy hell out of them... 

(Ignoring, of course, the fact that most pro-gun nutjobs hate hate HATE the thought of having to jump through government hoops to buy their guns)
Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 134709
Posted: 16 July 2010 at 9:47am | IP Logged | 9  

Any time you want to talk about what the Founding Fathers believed in, you have to take the whole package, not just the bits you like.

++

From this point I get you favor throwing the whole document out, because clearly it's founders were flawed.

••

Then you are an idiot. Welcome to my IGNORE list.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Michael Huber
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 27 August 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 3338
Posted: 16 July 2010 at 9:49am | IP Logged | 10  

The most telling point of the whole debate is this. They're already out there, you can't shut Pandora's box. If you could wish them off the planet, completely, something else would come along. Pesky inventive little things people are.
Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 134709
Posted: 16 July 2010 at 9:50am | IP Logged | 11  

I tend to believe that any law which cannot be enforced is a bad law.

••

The law against murder is impossible to enforce, or we would not have any murder trials in this country. Does that make it a bad law?

++

Then consider how many people are in favor of guns -- if they were ever banned, then gun-running would become an unstoppable national epidemic in the US.

••

Like it is in England, Canada, Japan. . . ?

Back to Top profile | search
 
Michael Huber
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 27 August 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 3338
Posted: 16 July 2010 at 9:51am | IP Logged | 12  

Gun running is already huge across our southern border. Huge. I don't have a clue how to fix that.
Back to Top profile | search
 

<< Prev Page of 50 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login