Posted: 30 July 2010 at 12:10pm | IP Logged | 11
|
|
|
I believe that it was thought that some rights were so intrinsic to being free men, that they needed to be specifically enumerated to protect them from the government. Hence the Bill of Rights. Gun ownership was one of these. •• Look out for that banana peel! Oops! Down he goes! Once more, with feeling: "A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state…" Well regulated. And who is it who imposes and maintains regulations? THE GOVERNMENT. So, the moment you invoke the Second Amendment as something that protects you and it FROM the government, you and it LOSE that protection. Clever, those Founding Fathers! +++ Okay, JB. A few more for you. Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of. Notwithstanding the military establishments in the several kingdoms of Europe, which are carried as far as the public resources will bear, the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; --James Madison, The Federalist Papers, No. 46 If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no recourse left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government, and which against the usurpations of the national rulers may be exerted with infinitely better prospect of success than against those of the rulers of an individual State. In a single State, if the persons entrusted with supreme power become usurpers, the different parcels, subdivisions, or districts of which it consists, having no distinct government in each, can take no regular measures for defense. The citizens must rush tumultuously to arms, without concert, without system, without resource; except in their courage and despair. -- Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 28 "Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States. A military force, at the command of Congress, can execute no laws, but such as the people perceive to be just and constitutional; for they will possess the power, and jealousy will instantly inspire the inclination, to resist the execution of a law which appears to them unjust and oppressive." --Noah Webster, An Examination of the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution (Philadelphia 1787). "What country can preserve its liberties if its rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms." -- Thomas Jefferson to William Stephens Smith, 1787. ME 6:373, Papers 12:356 " ... to disarm the people - that was the best and most effectual way to enslave them." -- George Mason, 3 Elliot, Debates at 380
Edited by Michael Abbey on 30 July 2010 at 12:13pm
|