Author |
|
Andy Williams Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: 16 April 2004 Posts: 99
|
Posted: 20 July 2010 at 8:50am | IP Logged | 1
|
|
|
Andy Williams 19:50 p.m. EDT 07/18 wrote:
Never said that any one life was worth less than another... |
|
|
Andy Williams 15:11 p.m. EDT 07/16 wrote:
No. I don't value their lives as much as I do others... |
|
|
Al, You forgot to include the part about the individual making the decision that their own life is worth less than the object of their desire, be it money, drugs, power, etc... They don't value their lives or any other...
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
John Byrne
Grumpy Old Guy
Joined: 11 May 2005 Posts: 134205
|
Posted: 20 July 2010 at 9:13am | IP Logged | 2
|
|
|
You forgot to include the part about the individual making the decision that their own life is worth less than the object of their desire, be it money, drugs, power, etc... They don't value their lives or any other...•• And that makes it okay to shoot people!! Obviously, this discussion will be moot until the gun nuts stop equating everything with everything else. "Cars kill people, so I can SHOOT people!" "Smoking kills people, so I can SHOOT people!" "You could kill somebody with a baseball bat, so I can SHOOT people!"
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Al Cook Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: 21 December 2004 Posts: 12735
|
Posted: 20 July 2010 at 9:15am | IP Logged | 3
|
|
|
"I think that they've decided their lives are worthless, so I can shoot them!"
It's sickening.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
John Byrne
Grumpy Old Guy
Joined: 11 May 2005 Posts: 134205
|
Posted: 20 July 2010 at 9:20am | IP Logged | 4
|
|
|
One of the elements that hardly ever seems to come up in the "guns for protection" argument is that fun phrase we hear out of New York and other big cities so often, "stray fire".The scenarios run to similar patterns. Punks start shooting at each other in the street, and some baby asleep in her crib gets killed, or some boy sitting on his front stoop end up with a bullet in his brain. The parents of these children might have closets full of howitzers, but they didn't do the victims any good -- nor would they be likely to, given how many times the weapons in these shootings turn out to have been stolen.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
John Byrne
Grumpy Old Guy
Joined: 11 May 2005 Posts: 134205
|
Posted: 20 July 2010 at 9:23am | IP Logged | 5
|
|
|
I lived in Augusta, Georgia for about 4 years while stationed at Ft. Gordon. Now Augusta is a fairly good sized city and in all that time I never had a worry that I was going to be robbed or attacked.In fact, the only time I ever had an incident is with some idiot redneck who cut me off in traffic and brandished his pistol at me because I had the audacity to blow my horn at him. So no criminals here, just a douchebag trying to show me how tough he was. •• This is why my first instinct, when cops use deadly force, is to side with the cops. They have to face this every day of their lives -- the knowledge that anyone they approach, for any reason, could pull out a gun and start shooting. Suspected perp, little old lady, kid playing truant. The cops cannot for a moment assume there is not going to be a gun involved, or they can very likely end up dead.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Jason Mark Hickok Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: 08 February 2009 Location: United States Posts: 10472
|
Posted: 20 July 2010 at 11:19am | IP Logged | 6
|
|
|
I know when the police do use excessive force (be it lethal or non-lethal) it is really big news. What I am actually more impressed with it how often the police don't use it. You would think that being in the positions they are that it would happen more often.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
e-mail
|
|
Andy Williams Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: 16 April 2004 Posts: 99
|
Posted: 20 July 2010 at 12:53pm | IP Logged | 7
|
|
|
JB and/or AL,
Wow...how'd you get "it's okay to shoot people" out of what I said? I don't advocate the shooting of anyone and haven't throughout this thread. Never said I thought it was okay to shoot anyone. I was asked if I valued a life lost in the commission of a crime less than an innocent life lost and answered that question.
If you wanted to know when/if I think it's okay then you should've asked that question and waited for the answer rather than freely and liberally paraphrasing the answer to a previous question.
I know plenty of "gun-nuts" and have never heard "cars kill people, so I can shoot people" from ANY of them*. The only people I've EVER heard that from are the rabid anti-gun nuts while having this same argument.
*edited to add - any resemblance to anyone who's ever posted on this board is unintentional...this statement refers to individuals known by the poster only.
Edited by Andy Williams on 20 July 2010 at 1:09pm
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
William McCormick Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: 26 February 2006 Posts: 3297
|
Posted: 20 July 2010 at 12:57pm | IP Logged | 8
|
|
|
The only people I've EVER heard that from are the rabid anti-gun nuts while having this same argument.
*****************
Go back and read some of the old "gun control" threads on this very forum and you'll see several of the "gun nuts" in here use that exact same argument.
And by that I mean they say things like "Cars kill people. Let's outlaw cars."
Edited by William McCormick on 20 July 2010 at 12:58pm
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Al Cook Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: 21 December 2004 Posts: 12735
|
Posted: 20 July 2010 at 12:59pm | IP Logged | 9
|
|
|
Andy, do you, or would you like to, have a handgun in your home to protect your family from someone breaking in and committing a crime?
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Matt Reed Byrne Robotics Security
Robotmod
Joined: 16 April 2004 Posts: 36289
|
Posted: 20 July 2010 at 1:00pm | IP Logged | 10
|
|
|
Andy Williams wrote:
I know plenty of "gun-nuts" and have never heard "cars kill people, so I can shoot people" from ANY of them. The only people I've EVER heard that from are the rabid anti-gun nuts while having this same argument. |
|
|
Absolutely disingenuous. It's been said in this very thread, Andy. Oh, not in so many words. But there are people in this thread as well as in past gun threads that ask if we're going to outlaw guns because they kill people, why aren't we outlawing cars, baseball bats, knives, rope, and aspirin? They kill people, but none of them are outlawed. So why should guns be outlawed on the basis that they kill people...convienantly ignoring the fact that the only use for a gun is to kill. That's it's intended purpose. When you use a car, a baseball bat, a knife, a rope to kill, or overdose on aspirin, you're not using it in the manner it was intended.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Andy Williams Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: 16 April 2004 Posts: 99
|
Posted: 20 July 2010 at 1:02pm | IP Logged | 11
|
|
|
William...can't answer for them. If you re-read my post it says that I know quite a few so-called "gun-nuts" and those are the people of whom I speak. Also, the statement to which I referred was "cars kill people, so I can shoot people" which implies an ignorance that none of my gun-nuts friends would/could achieve on their worst day.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Andy Williams Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: 16 April 2004 Posts: 99
|
Posted: 20 July 2010 at 1:07pm | IP Logged | 12
|
|
|
Matt, see my last post. How is my response disingenuous? I'm not referring to anyone other than the "gun-nuts" that I know personally and thought that came through in my post.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|