Posted: 01 July 2010 at 1:57pm | IP Logged | 2
|
|
|
" Maybe we just like change more. "
But this whole Wonder Woman redo screams as nothing more than change for change sake to me.
Beyond this whole costume change, if DC and JMS and Jim Lee wanted to work on a character who wears a jacket and has an origin where she leaves her home (Paradise Island) as a very young girl because the inhabitants were wiped out and is raised in America, well, why not just - CREATE a new character?
This happens all the time in comics or the movies. "Creative Talent" (quotes mine) acquire a known property, a long running character with an iconic look and radically change it, so that it no longer looks or has anything in common with the original source.
I'd use the current film version of "Jonah Hex" as an example. The producers acquire a lone, gritty, bounty hunter cowboy character and turn him into a western superhero with supernatural powers?
Why? What's the point? If they wanted to make a film about a superhero cowboy with supernatural powers, why not CREATE one?
The same thing with this "Wonder Woman" character.
The problem isn't change.
The problem isn't older men not wanting to accept change of a character.
The problem is not having enough creative people in the business that because they don't know how to write a specific character , ( and not having the guts to go out and self publish their desired character) they take an established one and shoehorn their ideas in on it.
And the usual result?
Long time fans hate and reject it because it resembles nothing like the caharcter and new fans grow bored and go on to the latest hot thing.
|