Posted: 16 July 2009 at 8:19pm | IP Logged | 1
|
|
|
Let's imagine for a moment that we live in a
world of superheroes. DC Universe, since that's where Batman lives. So
we live in a world with Superman, Batman, Wonder Woman, Green Lantern,
the Flash, etc etc etc. Some of these people -- if "people" is the word
-- have incredible, superhuman powers. Superman can lift enormous
weights and fly. So can Wonder Woman. Green Lantern can make just about
anything come out of that ring of his. Flash can run around the world
in the time it takes to say it. Some
of these people, as we know from reading their comics, don't have super
powers. Batman, Green Arrow, Robin, etc. But the people who share the
DC Universe with them don't have access to the comics we read. And
d'you think the non-powered folk make a point of announcing it? D'you
think the general population of Gotham City knows that Batman is just a
superb athlete in a leotard? Or are there urban legends, stories,
myths? Batman has been operating for years, even in DC time. He must
be more than just a guy in a leotard, right? He's still alive. So, at
the very least, that suit must be more than a leotard. It must be,
itself "super" in some way. (Always assuming Batman isn't -- and again, would he make a point of telling people that?) This is exactly the point I made a few years ago when we discussed Batman's origin. I submitted that Batman's choice to dress up could be based on Superman's appearance more than a visit by a bat, with the hopes that criminals would think he too was a super hero. I remember you agreeing with the logic.
But, you're right, JB. I should not have corrected you. I should have spoken for myself. So considering what I learned in the Army, I would aim center mass or high center chest, and use the oval for a target. Up close and personal, I would put it right in his forehead, with a second for good measure, before shooting him twice in the chest, just to be sure. And I would never tell a soul.
But really, I was not sharpshooting (pun intended) as much as I was working my way to my next point, the point that you really do not need to explain the oval. In doing so, you create an issue where there previously wasn't one.
Edited by Ted Pugliese on 16 July 2009 at 8:24pm
|