Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 30 Next >>
Topic: Why doesn’t Squadron Supreme get as much praise as Watchmen? (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Eric Lund
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 15 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 2074
Posted: 20 March 2009 at 2:12pm | IP Logged | 1  

The answer is simple... Squadron Supreme was not that good of a mini-series.

After Bob Hall and John Beatty left as the art team it became very mediocre. The series did not sell well at all and the only reason it gets any mention now is that Mark Gruenwald died and the stunt of printing the book with his ashes gave it some notoriety. It was not groundbreaking in the way the Watchmen was and didn't have the talent behind it that the Watchmen did.

Watchmen was a unified vision and Gibbons on the art throughout the whole series made it the epic that it is....

Squadron Supreme looked like any other mediocre Marvel book of the 80's. It started out strong and then fizzled out before it went anywhere. Just another book Shooter turned into shit by his heavy hand.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Victor Rodgers
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 26 December 2004
Posts: 3508
Posted: 20 March 2009 at 2:16pm | IP Logged | 2  

and only
a handful of people here are rating the Bob Hall/Paul Ryan art team above
Gibbons.
*****

Noone has done that.

Watchmen is a great comic. I read it last week and im still thinking about it. In fact its very simular to my experience after reading Squadron Supreme. The thing that grinds me gears (and I think others) are the people dropping their monocles at the idea Squadron is in the same class. Overall Watchmen would get a slight nod. Because of Gibbons and the superior printing and color. But they are in he same class.

Honestly I think Steve Gerber's Foolkiller is better than them both.

 


 QUOTE:
Squadron Supreme looked like any other mediocre Marvel book of the 80's. It started out strong and then fizzled out before it went anywhere.
Ridiculous statement, the later issues are the best in the series. The Tom Thumb attempting to cure cancer story was in issue 7. The finale was the best overall with a brutal final fight.


 QUOTE:
The series did not sell well at all and the only reason it gets any mention now is that Mark Gruenwald died and the stunt of printing the book with his ashes gave it some notoriety.
Or because people read it and thought it was a great story. I remember people talking about it before Gruenwald did. I know I hunted for the single issues for years. But oops I forgot fame and sales equal quality.



Edited by Victor Rodgers on 20 March 2009 at 2:20pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Martin Redmond
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 27 June 2006
Posts: 3882
Posted: 20 March 2009 at 2:19pm | IP Logged | 3  


 QUOTE:
Didn't Alan Moore take over writing on the later issues of Jughead's Jokebook Supreme and totally revamp it from the ground up?

It's a delightful puzzle of reference to reassemble. I am however, offended by your insinuation, chap. Moore is above writing stories. Moore is a raconteur.  I enjoy spending years trying to justify to myself that his masterpieces had a profound aim. They are works, that haunt.



Edited by Martin Redmond on 20 March 2009 at 2:20pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Trevor Giberson
Byrne Robotics Chronology
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Posts: 1888
Posted: 20 March 2009 at 2:23pm | IP Logged | 4  

Saying Squadron Supreme is as good as The Watchmen is the same as saying Liefeld's Youngblood is as good as Byrne's Fantastic Four.  The difference in quality is proportional.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Victor Rodgers
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 26 December 2004
Posts: 3508
Posted: 20 March 2009 at 2:34pm | IP Logged | 5  

No it fucking isn't. Thats the third stupidest thing wrote in this thread so far. Maybe you, Larsen and Pedro are sharing a comp.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Christopher Alan Miller
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 26 October 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 2787
Posted: 20 March 2009 at 2:34pm | IP Logged | 6  

It would be interesting to peek into an alternate universe where Gibbons did the Squadron Supreme art and Ryan and Hall worked on Watchmen.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Trevor Giberson
Byrne Robotics Chronology
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Posts: 1888
Posted: 20 March 2009 at 2:38pm | IP Logged | 7  

No it fucking isn't. Thats the third stupidest thing wrote in this thread so far. Maybe you, Larsen and Pedro are sharing a comp.

Sure, that must be it.... sheesh....


Edited by Trevor Giberson on 20 March 2009 at 2:39pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Andrew W. Farago
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 July 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 4079
Posted: 20 March 2009 at 2:54pm | IP Logged | 8  

Is target audience being taken into account in this discussion at all?
Moore and Gibbons were definitely aiming for an adult audience, and I'm
sure they thought of Watchmen as an anomaly--a superhero comic for
grown-ups--as opposed to something that was going to set the
standard for mainstream superheroes for the next 20 years.

Gruenwald and his artists were aiming for teens and pre-teens with their
comic, and I don't think I'd even put Squadron Supreme on the list of the
best "straight-up" superhero comics of 1985-86. Walt Simonson was on
Thor, Miller and Mazzuchelli were at least getting started on their
Daredevil run, John Byrne was on Fantastic Four, Chris Claremont and
John Romita Jr. were on X-Men, Marv Wolfman and George Perez were
still collaborating on Teen Titans, I think...was Squadron Supreme really
on par with all of those books, as a total package?
Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
David Kingsley Kingsley
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 18 June 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 1098
Posted: 20 March 2009 at 2:56pm | IP Logged | 9  

Yeah, I've been waiting for someone (thank you, Erik) to just post that Squadron Supreme isn't very good. I understand that it's a matter of opinion, but where Watchmen has incredible structure, compelling character beats, and memorable symbols and metaphors, all that I can recall from Squadron Supreme, which I've read much more recently than Watchmen, is stilted dialogue, stiff artwork, and a pretty typical story.

I don't think that I'd say Watchmen is perfect nor would I say that it's the most original comic ever, but it's characters and plotting have made it and will continue to make it withstand the test of time and to allow it to rightfully rank as a classic. There is nothing in Squadron Supreme that I feel is either original enough or particularly well done enough to be even memorable, let alone a classic.

And the Jughead Joke-Book comparison (spot-on) gave me my first laugh of the day. Thanks, Erik, 

Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Glenn Greenberg
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 6746
Posted: 20 March 2009 at 3:11pm | IP Logged | 10  

<<<Gruenwald's Captain America work did tail off toward the end of his
10-year run, no doubt about it. I've wondered if some of that might have
been due to his health situation.>>>

As far as I know, no. Mark was, by all appearances, in fine health up until
the day he died. And he had been off Cap for quite a while by August 12,
1996, so whatever your opinion may be of the quality of his writing
towards the end of his run on Cap, his health situation was most likely
not at all a factor.

He may have just stayed on the book a little too long, past the point
where he had anything left to say about the character. It happens--
sometimes you just can't bear to let go. It's unfair to hold up "Capwolf"
as representative of everything Gru did on the series. The long storyline
in which Steve Rogers was replaced as Cap was--and is--considered a
high point in the character's long history.


<<<the only reason it gets any mention now is that Mark Gruenwald died
and the stunt of printing the book with his ashes gave it some
notoriety.>>>

That's just an ignorant statement.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Victor Rodgers
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 26 December 2004
Posts: 3508
Posted: 20 March 2009 at 3:57pm | IP Logged | 11  

Gruenwald and his artists were aiming for teens and pre-teens with their
comic, and I don't think I'd even put Squadron Supreme on the list of the
best "straight-up" superhero comics of 1985-86. Walt Simonson was on
Thor, Miller and Mazzuchelli were at least getting started on their
Daredevil run, John Byrne was on Fantastic Four, Chris Claremont and
John Romita Jr. were on X-Men, Marv Wolfman and George Perez were
still collaborating on Teen Titans, I think...was Squadron Supreme really
on par with all of those books, as a total package?

*******

Better than Claremont and Romita Jr on X-Men. I would put it under the other books listed. I would put Watchmen beneath them too. But not being as good as Simonson Thor and Byrne FF is hardly a condemnation.  


 QUOTE:
which I've read much more recently than Watchmen, is stilted dialogue, stiff artwork, and a pretty typical story.
and the laughs keep on coming.



Edited by Victor Rodgers on 20 March 2009 at 4:00pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Ted Pugliese
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 05 December 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 7985
Posted: 20 March 2009 at 4:18pm | IP Logged | 12  

Watchmen has its reputation for a reason.

Yes, but the reason is Dave Gibbons, though most people think it's Alan Moore.
Back to Top profile | search | www
 

<< Prev Page of 30 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login