Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 30 Next >>
Topic: Why doesn’t Squadron Supreme get as much praise as Watchmen? (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Trevor Smith
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 September 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 3542
Posted: 17 March 2009 at 7:34pm | IP Logged | 1  

For what it's worth, Squadron was my first exposure to
Bob Hall, as far as I remember, and I loved his work in
it!
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Victor Rodgers
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 26 December 2004
Posts: 3508
Posted: 17 March 2009 at 7:39pm | IP Logged | 2  

I don't think either Paul Ryan or Bob Hall are terrible. However,  I wouldn't hold up Squadron Supreme as an example of either's best work.

****

I wouldn't either. But it wasn't terrible and I think the print quality and the inking hurt it more than anything. Go look for images from Death of a Universe (the Squadron graphic novel), some great art in there.


 QUOTE:
For what it's worth, Squadron was my first exposure to
Bob Hall, as far as I remember, and I loved his work in
it!
Mine was the West Coast Avengers mini series.



Edited by Victor Rodgers on 17 March 2009 at 7:50pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Eric Smearman
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 02 September 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 5823
Posted: 17 March 2009 at 7:45pm | IP Logged | 3  

"Go look for images from Death of a Universe..."

No need, Victor. I own it. And I agree 100%.



Edited by Eric Smearman on 17 March 2009 at 7:58pm
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
John OConnor
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 01 August 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 1109
Posted: 17 March 2009 at 8:44pm | IP Logged | 4  

"Andrew look back a few pages and you will see both him
and Bob Hall called Terrible. "


Victor-- I just checked -- no one has said that.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Ray Brady
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 3740
Posted: 17 March 2009 at 8:49pm | IP Logged | 5  

Check page 3. Pedro said: "Squadron Supreme is WAY better as story, but, as
I said, the art is mostly terrible, in particular on the first few issues."
Back to Top profile | search | www
 
John OConnor
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 01 August 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 1109
Posted: 17 March 2009 at 8:52pm | IP Logged | 6  

then I must apologize immediately
Back to Top profile | search
 
JT Molloy
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 February 2008
Posts: 2092
Posted: 18 March 2009 at 12:51am | IP Logged | 7  

Pardon my french but I'm SOOoooo fucking sick of "telling a
good story". That's the wooorst kind of buzzword/phrase that's come out of
the Quesada regime of comics.

Deconstructionist, needless political allegoy, decompressed absolute bullshit
is ALWAYS justified by these CON-artist frigging writers by dropping the
phrase "to tell a good story" and the fanboy idiots eat it up every single
goddamn time. EVERY sinlge time.

UGH.

Think for yourself, PLEASE some of you.

Edited by JT Molloy on 18 March 2009 at 12:51am
Back to Top profile | search
 
JT Molloy
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 February 2008
Posts: 2092
Posted: 18 March 2009 at 12:52am | IP Logged | 8  

I mean seriously, it;s just so VAGUE.

I'm done now I promise.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Andrew W. Farago
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 July 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 4079
Posted: 18 March 2009 at 1:18am | IP Logged | 9  

I'm not knocking Dave Gibbons' art, as I'm sure it was more the writer dictating this, but why was everything so damn localized? It's like New York in the Watchmen's world was 3 blocks. That teleporting alien squid thing supposedly killed half of New York. Seems to me the thing killed 60 people tops.

Personally, I think the destruction in New York was that much more effective *because* we knew the victims.  Pulling back and showing the city as a smoking crater would demonstrate tragedy, sure, but closing in on people that we've come to know over the course of hundreds of pages puts a human face on the tragedy.


Edited by Andrew W. Farago on 18 March 2009 at 1:19am
Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Pedro Cruz
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 03 January 2006
Posts: 417
Posted: 18 March 2009 at 1:41am | IP Logged | 10  

JB, maybe I didn't phrase it in a proper manner but is it self-loathing to try to go beyond a medium traditional restrictions? Watchmen certainly isn't the only comic that does so.  If comics hadn't tried to do so, they'd still be all exactly like they were back when More Fun Comics was first published. 

Ray, there are 2 Pedros here. Maybe that lead to some confusion.

Matt, you are right, it is a pointless exercise. Thanks.



Edited by Pedro Cruz on 18 March 2009 at 1:44am
Back to Top profile | search
 
Deepak Ramani
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 26 May 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 85
Posted: 18 March 2009 at 7:15am | IP Logged | 11  

 Victor Rodgers wrote:
I read [Watchmen] recently and I loved it. Its a great story with some great characters. But so is Squadron Supreme.


I agree with this.  I overall prefer Watchmen, but Squadron Supreme is a terrific comic book too.  And while Watchmen is tied to a particular time and situation (nuclear armageddon) Squadron Supreme's warnings of a totalitarian government are pretty much always relevant.  I don't really see that much similarity between the two stories, to be honest.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Deepak Ramani
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 26 May 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 85
Posted: 18 March 2009 at 7:21am | IP Logged | 12  

 JT Molloy wrote:
Deconstructionist, needless political allegoy, decompressed absolute bullshit is ALWAYS justified by these CON-artist frigging writers by dropping the phrase "to tell a good story" and the fanboy idiots eat it up every single
goddamn time. EVERY single time.


I prefer to think the so-called "fanboy idiots" like the stories they buy, deconstructionism, political allegories, decompression and all.  It's hard for me to understand, but Civil War, to pick an example at random, seemed to be liked by a large majority of people who read it.  Otherwise, why waste your money buying it?
Back to Top profile | search
 

<< Prev Page of 30 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login