Author |
|
Andrew Bitner Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 01 June 2004 Location: United States Posts: 7527
|
Posted: 07 December 2008 at 2:07pm | IP Logged | 1
|
|
|
To me, DKR Batman starts out looking like classic Batman but the events of the mini seem to break him down-- by the fourth book, he was looking "hulkish" but also old and badly battered. This was a Batman staring at the end, for better or worse.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Friedrich Thorben Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 08 July 2008 Posts: 344
|
Posted: 07 December 2008 at 3:12pm | IP Logged | 2
|
|
|
Miller's "Dark Knight" Batman looked like a fat marshmellow in the end. What happened to the whole art? I don't think that was intentional.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Paul Kimball Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 21 September 2006 Location: United States Posts: 2215
|
Posted: 07 December 2008 at 3:35pm | IP Logged | 3
|
|
|
I think that the first time as a kid I saw Kirby's art and realized it was his
was on the superpowers series. I remember seeing that Batman and thinking
"this is the the guy everyone loves?". Forgive me, I was young.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Brian Hague Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 14 November 2006 Posts: 8515
|
Posted: 07 December 2008 at 3:55pm | IP Logged | 4
|
|
|
JB wrote: "Tell you something I don't like about it! The date of the inks would seem to indicate somebody had that piece in pencil form, and decided to get it inked! Unless this was done on overlay, that means an example of Kirby's pencils is now lost, and, let's face it, he's not likely to be producing any more! "
I believe that piece was inked on an overlay by Norm Breyfogle. The owner also commisioned Breyfogle to do a version that "fixed" Kirby's anatomy and stylistic choices. I don't recommend it...
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
e-mail
|
|
Flavio Sapha Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 16 April 2004 Location: Brazil Posts: 12912
|
Posted: 07 December 2008 at 4:38pm | IP Logged | 5
|
|
|
Miller's "Dark Knight" Batman looked like a fat marshmellow in the end.
What happened to the whole art?
+++
I see less and less of Klaus Janson there...
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Wayde Murray Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 14 October 2005 Location: Canada Posts: 3115
|
Posted: 07 December 2008 at 6:32pm | IP Logged | 6
|
|
|
I've never read Dark Knight, mostly because Frank Miller's Batman doesn't work for me, visually. Alex Ross might have done a slightly worse job (excluding Kingdom Come), since his Batman is in his prime whereas Frank's is a much older man, but the hulking, brutish Batman just wasn't for me.
Images I've seen of Miller's Batman using a rifle made me think I made the right choice.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Ted Pugliese Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 05 December 2005 Location: United States Posts: 7985
|
Posted: 07 December 2008 at 7:25pm | IP Logged | 7
|
|
|
Jack Kirby and Batman
I miss both of them...
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
| www
|
|
Ted Pugliese Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 05 December 2005 Location: United States Posts: 7985
|
Posted: 07 December 2008 at 7:26pm | IP Logged | 8
|
|
|
You gotta love Jack Kirby's Captain Marvel!
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
| www
|
|
Chad Carter Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 16 June 2005 Posts: 9584
|
Posted: 07 December 2008 at 7:40pm | IP Logged | 9
|
|
|
Rich Buckler's version of the Thing has much informed my own rendering of the character.
Now that's pretty cool.
Makes sense too.
What makes the Buckler Thing connect with you, JB, if I may be so bold?
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Flavio Sapha Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 16 April 2004 Location: Brazil Posts: 12912
|
Posted: 07 December 2008 at 8:33pm | IP Logged | 10
|
|
|
Miller's Batman using a rifle
+++
Nope. The rifle fired line-hooks or gas pellets. In DKR, Miller makes a big
fuss of Batman's aversion to guns.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Jason Czeskleba Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 30 April 2004 Posts: 4649
|
Posted: 07 December 2008 at 9:38pm | IP Logged | 11
|
|
|
Buckler's Thing was to me the only 70's version that retained the grittier Kirby feel to it. I'm sure it didn't hurt that Buckler was doing a fair amount of swiping of Kirby to get the results he did. But whatever the reason, his version was a nice sythesis of the Kirby version and the "orange teddy bear" 70s version developed by Buscema, Romita, and Sinnott and followed by pretty much everyone else at that time.
Even overlooking his version of the Thing, that Avengers #93 cover is one of the least impressive pieces I've ever seen by Adams. It seems very crowded. I guess he is human after all.
Edited by Jason Czeskleba on 07 December 2008 at 9:45pm
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Wayde Murray Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 14 October 2005 Location: Canada Posts: 3115
|
Posted: 07 December 2008 at 10:00pm | IP Logged | 12
|
|
|
Flavio wrote:
Nope. The rifle fired line-hooks or gas pellets. In DKR, Miller makes a big fuss of Batman's aversion to guns.
I get what you're saying, but it was still a rifle. It fired non-lethal ordnance, perhaps, but it was still a firearm. The Batman's been throwing his lines for swinging for decades, and when he uses a mechanical assist (as in the animated series) it's by way of a device that looks nothing like a conventional gun.
It just looked wrong to me to see The Batman with a rifle stock up against his shoulder. Coupled with the too-bulky Batman and it was an easy decision for me to pass on the book.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|