| Posted: 17 March 2009 at 2:38pm | IP Logged | 8
|
|
|
Reform is the least observant.
There used to be no denominations. Then there was a movement in the 19th century to "reform" the Jewish religion so as to update it vis-a-vis some of the newer freedoms Jews had as citizens of newly formed nations. But those reforms went too far by some groups' notions, so they made an "orthodox" denomination in response. But then THEY were too strict by yet other groups' notions, and they in turn called themselves "conservative," i.e., they would modernize everything possible but conserve what was essential. Some of the commandments, though, the Conservative did not consider essential, so that didn't play well with the Orthodox. Later on, in the 20th century, a sub-group came out called the Modern Orthodox who were still 100% observant but also extremely open to all forms of modern study, even scientific biblical criticism. And then, well, even more groups.
This "splintering" characterized the Ashkenazic Jews (those from North Europe). The Sephardim, like me (from the Mediterranean and Middle East), never splintered self-consciously into definitive separate groups.
Too much Jewy info...!
Somebody say something really gay -- quick!
Edited by Michael Penn on 17 March 2009 at 2:40pm
|