Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 829 Next >>
Topic: My Big Fat Gay... THREAD DRIFT (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Moyer Hall
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 09 August 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 1135
Posted: 23 December 2008 at 12:33pm | IP Logged | 1  

You crack me up Jodi! I learned the "spit" line from RuPaul. It's stayed with
me every since. How gay is that???

Joakim, there definitely isn't one way to be gay. There was a great line from
Patrick Stewart's line in Jeffrey that had something to do with three
"normal" guys who were being interviewed and were out, and more
legitimate because they didn't "act" gay. Dammit wish I could find that
quote!!!
Back to Top profile | search
 
Kevin Hagerman
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 15 April 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 18349
Posted: 23 December 2008 at 12:43pm | IP Logged | 2  

I hear you loud and clear, but from the point of genetic drive to reproduce and in animalistic terms be the king of the kill, it still strikes me as odd that male homosexuality would pose a problem.

-----------

Think of how your typical male feels vaguely threatened when anything blurs the gender lines - men with long hair (sometimes even women with short hair) being a decent example of recent vintage.  Men like to get their rocks off, and gay/effeminate/non-traditional men pose the "threat" of being a sexual outlet that is a reproductive dead end.

The "family values" crowd can go on and on about love, and God's plan for us, and the family unit, but in the end?  It's all about cocks and cunts.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Guests
Byrne Robotics Visitor


Joined: 01 October 2003
Posts: -26
Posted: 23 December 2008 at 1:03pm | IP Logged | 3  

Category three, Dan, would be people who don't have a personal problem with homosexuality, but see it as wrong because it says it is wrong in The Bible (or similar holy text for the applicable religion).

Thanks for the elaboration, Kevin.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Jodi Moisan
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 February 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 6808
Posted: 23 December 2008 at 1:03pm | IP Logged | 4  

You crack me up Jodi! I learned the "spit" line from RuPaul. It's stayed with
me every since. How gay is that???

Well call me Rosie because I LOVED RuPaul!!!!!! I wonder whatever happened to him? Damn he was a good looking woman and sooooo funny.

Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Jodi Moisan
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 February 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 6808
Posted: 23 December 2008 at 1:06pm | IP Logged | 5  

Question for the thread members: Best Christmas gift you ever gave or received?
Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Guests
Byrne Robotics Visitor


Joined: 01 October 2003
Posts: -26
Posted: 23 December 2008 at 1:17pm | IP Logged | 6  

Dan here is the thing that I have a problem with . . .

Jodi -

I appreciate your thoughtful explanation.  I do understand where you're coming from.  Your conclusion follows nicely from your premise.  However, as you know, many Christians start with a different premise.  I know what I am about to say is difficult to appreciate, understand or even believe; but I don't believe that Christians (in regards to gay marriage) are about preventing gays from having their rights.  A biblical conviction leads Christians to believe that God as the Creator created men and women to enjoy one another sexually in the bond of heterosexual, monogamous, faithful marriage.  The sexual intimacy and sometimes the children which are the fruit of that union are by God's design for people to enjoy.  The Bible is clear that other "forms" of sexual activity are not in concord with God's design, and therefore are seen as less than ideal.  In sum, Christians aren't about taking away the rights of gays to be married.  Rather, Christians are promoting and defending what the Creator established as good, perfect and joyful.  I know that atheists and members of the GLBT community will disagree, but that is where the majority of Christians are coming from on this issue.  Unfortunately, in our pluralistic society, there is an extreme divide on this issue which makes it challenging and often impossible to come to agreement on something that is so personal to people from either side of the discussion.

BTW: I like Billy Graham too !  He is (imho) the most respected, humble Christian leader of our era.  He is a man of total integrity !



Edited by Dan Walsh on 23 December 2008 at 1:18pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Guests
Byrne Robotics Visitor


Joined: 01 October 2003
Posts: -26
Posted: 23 December 2008 at 1:20pm | IP Logged | 7  

Dan, I’m still a bit curious as to why religious people have not been raising a ruccus about the secularisation of marriage in society at large, but get very ”it’s all religious and sacred” once gay people want part of the social benefits.

Joakim -

Please elaborate on what you mean by secularisation of marriage, and then I'll be happy to answer your question !



Edited by Dan Walsh on 23 December 2008 at 1:20pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Guests
Byrne Robotics Visitor


Joined: 01 October 2003
Posts: -26
Posted: 23 December 2008 at 1:22pm | IP Logged | 8  

I'm going to take my wife out for lunch at our favorite Italian restaurant !  I'll be back in a bit ! :-)

Back to Top profile | search
 
Bruce Buchanan
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 14 June 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 4797
Posted: 23 December 2008 at 1:42pm | IP Logged | 9  

Question for the thread members: Best Christmas gift you ever gave or received?

************
My wife always gives really thoughtful Christmas presents. Last year, she gave me a digitial photo album, which was cool enough. But when I turned it on, I realized it already was filled with photos of our son.

Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Jodi Moisan
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 February 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 6808
Posted: 23 December 2008 at 1:51pm | IP Logged | 10  

Dan thanks for the thoughtful post and have a great lunch!

I am getting from your post and correct me if I am wrong, is this:

Christians feel the word and religious ceremony that "marriage" is, according to the bible,  an act between a man and a woman, for the sole purpose to create life. And by saying that gay couples are not following exactly the religious meaning of the ritual called marriage, they should not be allowed to call it that.  Christians feel marriage is religion based and there are rules to follow. Is it that they feel they have "ownership " in the word?

Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Jodi Moisan
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 February 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 6808
Posted: 23 December 2008 at 1:52pm | IP Logged | 11  

My wife always gives really thoughtful Christmas presents. Last year, she gave me a digitial photo album, which was cool enough. But when I turned it on, I realized it already was filled with photos of our son.

That is a GREAT gift.

Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Joakim Jahlmar
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 10 October 2005
Location: Sweden
Posts: 6080
Posted: 23 December 2008 at 2:06pm | IP Logged | 12  

Kevin wrote:
”Think of how your typical male feels vaguely threatened when anything blurs the gender lines - men with long hair (sometimes even women with short hair) being a decent example of recent vintage.  Men like to get their rocks off, and gay/effeminate/non-traditional men pose the ’threat’ of being a sexual outlet that is a reproductive dead end.”

Still, then we’re no longer on the genetic reproduction level you argued just previously. If that was the main drive, each individual wouldn’t care about any other’s reproductive dead ends, since their main objective would be to further their own genetic material into future generations. Pure egotistical one might well say.

Dan wrote:
”Please elaborate on what you mean by secularisation of marriage, and then I'll be happy to answer your question !”

I mean the fact that there’re are a great deal of people marrying outside of Christianity and religion in general, i.e. state sanctioned unions that aren’t strictly speaking sanctified by any divinity.  I’ve yet to hear a great ruckus about people using the term marriage for that particular activity, yet strictly speaking, if the term is to hold as a religious term (which I’d argue it no longer does) those non-religious marriages ought to have been heavily attacked as an institution ages ago.  Yet, as stated, I hear no real complaints in that area from ANY Christian or religious quarters.

Back to Top profile | search | www
 

<< Prev Page of 829 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login