Good pointed. You just want to get toasted right? (in every sense of the word)*

* Ducks for safety and counts down...

Brian lol gay cats + See, the problem is straight men are okay with pussy-on-pussy action... = Comedy gold!

Tom wrote:
"See, the problem is straight men are okay with pussy-on-pussy action..."

This just in:
Tom French argues for the need for the concept of LOL Chicken (cf. LOL Cats) just so as to get some cock on cock action.
Note: photographic problem of getting two cocks cuddling makes it more likely to find photos of cock fights.

Joakim, a few years ago a sitcom had two guys talking about having a sword fight and Danielle asked me if I'd ever had a sword fight and, since I had two brothers, I said sure. She looked at me strangely and said okay skeptically. I let it pass and she brought it up a few hours later, asking if I was joking. I wasn't so I said I wasn't. That answer nonplussed her and finally she asked how that was possible; she thought we were using our penises as swords and slapping them against each other.

After laughing till tears came I informed her that the 'swords' in the sword fight was actually urine and all it meant was two boys were using the toilet at the same time. That relieved her.

Though relieved is probably an unfortunate word choice.

Steve wrote:
"Though relieved is probably an unfortunate word choice."

Or perhaps a VERY good one...

Marc wrote:
"That clarification was not just news to Danielle; I never knew that, either!"

I have to echo that as well, Marc, and to be honest, I do think that both "versions" are possible interpretations. I seem to recall having caught a reference on telly where two people (guys) discuss a "threesome"* and one of them say something to the effect that they (i.e. the guys) will just have to be careful to avoid crossing swords in the process.  And I do believe the reference in that case was, without doubt, to actual penises being in contact... or otherwise the sexual acts conteplated takes on rather perverted overtones.

* Given the gist of the non-sword-crossing one could of course debate whether a two people on a third without interaction between one another actually constitutes a threesome proper, or something slightly different.

Marc wrote:
"(P.S., I was happier with how I *thought* it was done... bitch.)"

Well, as both does seem viable options... go with the one that makes you happy, Marc! ;)