| Posted: 21 October 2008 at 6:50am | IP Logged | 9
|
|
|
Don wrote: "I was more referring to the cro-mag manly-man, homophobe type, that acording to my sources, seem to rush through and not properly satisfy their partner. I was trying to Imply that the bit of gay I have is what allows me to empathize with my lovers and always leave them with a smile."
Oh, I got that, Don, I just couldn't resist the swing. ;) And I'm betting there're some cro-mag manly-man gay men out there as well, with about as much interest in a partner's sexual satisfication as their hetero counterparts.
More Don: "I should point out that I am not trying to be a braggart here. I was raised to treat a lady right and what is good for the goose, is good for the gander."
A good policy. And I'd add that there's something pleasing in pleasuring as well.
Even more Don: "And in regards to your not-so hidden hint, that can always be an option, it's a matter of trust, and something that can be quite fun..."
True, but it just looked to good next to the possibility of that being the definition of a considerate lover (especially since I know a multitude of women who'd balk at that particular notion). so nothing against your original post, really, Don. It was just too good possible interpretation not to take a swing. (and as a last line of defense I'll add that I WAS writing it at 1.32 a.m. local time, so my mind leaps and twists in ways only the nighttime can make it... or not). :)
|