| Author |
|
Keith Elder
Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 1974
|
| Posted: 28 February 2008 at 11:30pm | IP Logged | 1
|
|
|
That drawing Mack did based off the photograph doesn't really bother me... it looks like it was redrawn, not traced, and it's always been obvious Mack uses models.
That Kabuki/Alan Davis swipe is disheartening, though... Mack is so damn good, why swipe a pose that closely (even down to how the fingers are spread)?
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
e-mail
|
| |
Charles Valderrama
Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 4859
|
| Posted: 28 February 2008 at 11:34pm | IP Logged | 2
|
|
|
Knut Robert Knutsen wrote:
Eisner, Kubert, Kirby, Buscema (both),
Romita (both), Ditko, Aparo, Swan, Schaffenberger, Alcala, Andru, Kane.
There's more. There's even another list with people who have drawn
monthlies most of the their career, but not so much now.
Name 10 artists who are better than those and don't do
monthlies. |
|
|
JB, José Luis García-López, Michael Golden, Adam Hughes, Jason Pearson,
Alan Davis, Walter Simonson, Arthur Adams... off the top of my head. i'd
LOVE it if these artists would produce books on a monthly basis. ( i'd be
broke too!!!)
BTW, i never said really good artists couldn't handle a workload of
22 pages a month-- i just assume they have chosen not to.
'Course, it could be the fault of the editorial staff that choses creative
teams for the books.
Also just to clarify-- i didn't mean to use the word "productivity" as a
BAD word; i meant that most of the artists i really admire haven't stepped
up to do a monthly in a while. Maybe it's not their fault but i wish they
could be more involved in the industry as they were years ago.
-C!
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
| www
|
| |
Robert Bradley
Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 20 September 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 4887
|
| Posted: 28 February 2008 at 11:42pm | IP Logged | 3
|
|
|
The problem with swiping from photographs in magazines is that those photos are generally copyrighted.
If you're going to use photo reference like that, do what alex ross does and hire your own models, or just go and use stock photos.
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
| www
|
| |
Jozef Brandt
Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 03 March 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 2670
|
| Posted: 28 February 2008 at 11:50pm | IP Logged | 4
|
|
|
There's a ****rama thread where Mack "defends" himself. Kinda sad IMO. Aleev and one of the other swiped artists post in the thread actually.
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
| |
Robert LaGuardia
Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 15 November 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 1296
|
| Posted: 29 February 2008 at 12:53am | IP Logged | 5
|
|
|
QUOTE:
Matthew McCallum:That Kabuki swipe: Where does the original Alan Davis picture from? It looks
familiar, but I don't recall the source. (X-Men? Excalibur?) |
|
|
That's from Uncanny X-Men annual 11
Edited by Robert LaGuardia on 29 February 2008 at 12:53am
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
e-mail
|
| |
Thorsten Brochhaus
Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 25 August 2004
Posts: 328
|
| Posted: 29 February 2008 at 2:42am | IP Logged | 6
|
|
|
A large number of people think that the swiped image came from the mind
and talent of the artist they're looking at...not the person that
originally did it!
---
And a large number of people just don't care. They couldn't care less how the art is produced. If I buy a car and the dashboard design is "swiped" from another companys car I probably wouldn't care too, as long as I like it. Thats how a lot of people (even more back in Liefelds heydays) see it.
Don't get me wrong, it doesn't make it any better. Just saying.
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
| |
Lars Johansson
Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 04 June 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 6113
|
| Posted: 29 February 2008 at 6:03am | IP Logged | 7
|
|
|
OT, but this is an article about plagiarism
http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/Business/2008/02/20/swedes_comp lain_about_marc_jacobs_scarf/6340/
For your viewing pleasure here is the current Marc Jacobs scarf from the spring collection
And here is the creator's son who shows his father's Swedish creation from the fifties.
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
| www
e-mail
|
| |
Paulo Pereira
Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 24 April 2006
Posts: 15539
|
| Posted: 29 February 2008 at 7:57am | IP Logged | 8
|
|
|
QUOTE:
| I thought people might slam the horrible swipe in that panel... but ok... the dialogue sucks too... whatever... |
|
|
I like how the feet are unswiped.
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
| |
Paulo Pereira
Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 24 April 2006
Posts: 15539
|
| Posted: 29 February 2008 at 8:00am | IP Logged | 9
|
|
|
QUOTE:
| By the way, it is swiping to draw from a live photograph as opposed to another artist's creation? |
|
|
Simple answer: if the photo is copyrighted, yes.
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
| |
Joe Hollon
Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 08 May 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 13704
|
| Posted: 29 February 2008 at 8:06am | IP Logged | 10
|
|
|
Liefeld must've almost literally flipped through his back issue comics, found panels he liked by other artists and built his stories around piecing them together using his characters. What a sham.
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
| www
e-mail
|
| |
Paulo Pereira
Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 24 April 2006
Posts: 15539
|
| Posted: 29 February 2008 at 8:07am | IP Logged | 11
|
|
|
The thing I find annoying about that Kabuki swipe (of which I also posted a larger version on page 5 of this thread) is that not only does Mack sign the work, he also signs the comic book. I can't say why that annoys me, it just does.
As for the swipe of the photo, I'm not a fan of this practice either, except in special cases (likenesses or iconic photographs). Photorealism is generally boring to me.
Edited by Paulo Pereira on 29 February 2008 at 8:10am
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
| |
Martin Redmond
Byrne Robotics Member
Joined: 27 June 2006
Posts: 3882
|
| Posted: 29 February 2008 at 8:09am | IP Logged | 12
|
|
|
Linchensten was one of the very first museum exhibitions I saw here. We were really hyped up about it and left less than thrilled. It's trash, don't bother. And don't get me wrong, I love contemporary arts exhibits, especially the interactive useless mechanisms or bizarre room set ups.
QUOTE:
| That drawing Mack did based off the photograph doesn't really bother me... it looks like it was redrawn, not traced, and it's always been obvious Mack uses models. |
|
|
If he had at least changed the framing or the models' faces, sure. Yet, here they are, line for line doing the same thing. I don't think it's a fair theft at all.
Edited by Martin Redmond on 29 February 2008 at 8:13am
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
| |
Topic Closed)
