Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 68 Next >>
Topic: What constitutes a swipe? (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Emery Calame
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 5773
Posted: 20 February 2008 at 10:03am | IP Logged | 1  

Greg Land (or other artists) doing swipes doesn't bother me. Greg Land (or other artists) tracing frames from movies doesn't bother me, nor does the fact that there are multiple female characters in different books with the same face down to the hair.

What bothers me about Greg Land is his habit of tracing porn stars and painting super hero uniforms on them and having them still look EXACTLY like pornstars in the midle of a scene only wearing super hero costumes. It's not only tacky but surreal enough to make me stop enjoying or following what is supposed to be happening in the comics.




Edited by Emery Calame on 20 February 2008 at 10:07am
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Knut Robert Knutsen
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 22 September 2006
Posts: 7374
Posted: 20 February 2008 at 10:17am | IP Logged | 2  

But then again, if someone decides to do another porn/superhero comic, we all know Greg Land is the right man for the job.

Someone should recommend him as the artist for that "Jenna Jameson" series Christina Z is doing. It could be to Greg Land what Daredevil was to Frank Miller.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Al Cook
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 December 2004
Posts: 12736
Posted: 20 February 2008 at 10:17am | IP Logged | 3  

Now that's just creepy.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Paulo Pereira
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 24 April 2006
Posts: 15539
Posted: 20 February 2008 at 10:52am | IP Logged | 4  


 QUOTE:
Greg Land (or other artists) doing swipes doesn't bother me. Greg Land (or other artists) tracing frames from movies doesn't bother me, nor does the fact that there are multiple female characters in different books with the same face down to the hair.

What bothers me about Greg Land is his habit of tracing porn stars and painting super hero uniforms on them and having them still look EXACTLY like pornstars in the midle of a scene only wearing super hero costumes. It's not only tacky but surreal enough to make me stop enjoying or following what is supposed to be happening in the comics.

I'm bothered by that as well as the stuff you said you weren't bothered by.  I'm also bothered by the poorly drawn hands.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Gregg Halecki
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 03 June 2005
Posts: 759
Posted: 20 February 2008 at 2:32pm | IP Logged | 5  

I think that there is a certain distinction between using an iconic picture as the basis of another book cover, and using it as the cover of some sort of trade mag or promotional material.

I see the JB FF cover with Ben and Jonny fighting the Mole Man's monster as a homage, where the cover (I think it was Marvel Age?) with JB's face in place of the monster as more of a direct swipe (in my rationale as flawed as it may be), and by swipe I mean it in a very GOOD way.
I guess it could be considered splitting hairs, but if indeed it is properly called a swipe, then it is a PROPER use of a swipe.
On the cover of Amazing Heros or Alter Ego or something it seems to me that an artist is saying "here is my taking an image you are all familiar with and doing my own job on it because I love it as much as you do" where doing a homage in a regular book is more him saying "here is a cover using similarities to an image you are familiar with because I am trying to invoke feelings that are associated with the original picture, or to contrast something that is seemingly similar but very diferent". Of course other times it is an artist (or even an editor that requests the image) trying to get some cheap milage for it's own sake.

Some of the images have gotten almost a life of their own. The iconagraphy of GS X-Men 1 was SO dramatic that the picture itself came to represent more than just the book that it was in front of, but the whole title itself. In this case, it makes plenty of sense that the image be used over again in the context of the various X-universe. Sometimes it is unoriginality, other times it is just a fun little page (like Mighty Mouse).
Back to Top profile | search
 
Gerry Turnbull
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: Scotland
Posts: 8766
Posted: 20 February 2008 at 3:09pm | IP Logged | 6  

i was over at Neal Adams site,i was wrong about the Hex cover,twas Ed Hannigan and Mark Texeira

http://www.nealadams.com/DC/hex/hex.html

Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Wallace Sellars
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 01 May 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 17701
Posted: 20 February 2008 at 3:28pm | IP Logged | 7  

Wow.
Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Brendan Howard
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar
FAQ Master Supreme

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 4943
Posted: 20 February 2008 at 3:53pm | IP Logged | 8  

I think the difference between homages and swipes is clear.

When an artist copies another artist's pose or layout on the downlow to solve a drawing problem without crediting the original artist, it's a swipe.

When an artist copies another artist's pose or layout to leverage its fame or to poke fun at it and gives full credit, it's a homage. Sometimes it's not even necessary to give full credit, because the inspiration for the homage is so obvious!

Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Scott Nickel
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 10 July 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 132
Posted: 20 February 2008 at 4:01pm | IP Logged | 9  

Crap! Now my joke's blown.

Never mind.

 

 



Edited by Scott Nickel on 20 February 2008 at 4:05pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Paulo Pereira
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 24 April 2006
Posts: 15539
Posted: 20 February 2008 at 4:19pm | IP Logged | 10  

Can someone tell me what this is a homage of?

Back to Top profile | search
 
Knut Robert Knutsen
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 22 September 2006
Posts: 7374
Posted: 20 February 2008 at 4:23pm | IP Logged | 11  

Neal Adams' famous X-men cover. Issue 56, I think with the Living Monolith crushing the Logo.

edit (Oh, And it's also an homage of JB's homage with the Dark Phoenix crushing the Logo.)



Edited by Knut Robert Knutsen on 20 February 2008 at 4:25pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
William Roberge
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 05 July 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 11314
Posted: 20 February 2008 at 4:24pm | IP Logged | 12  

Umm....Joke, Yes?

 

Edit for:This was a post for Paulo

Also edit for: Knut is correct.



Edited by William Roberge on 20 February 2008 at 4:27pm
Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 

<< Prev Page of 68 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login