Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 146 Next >>
Topic: Spider-Man rebooted (spoilers) (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Brian Hunt
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 5178
Posted: 02 January 2008 at 6:26pm | IP Logged | 1  

I'm willing to allow the ends to justify the means this time because there were so many bad decisions made with the Spider-Man mythos in the last five years that it's worth it to me to be back to a point were a version of Spider-Man exists that I can enjoy reading.  I had no objection to his marriage and I have enjoyed many of the stories that resulted from it.  I also grew up reading stories when he was single.  

Here on the JBF we often postulate what it would be like to live in the M***** Universe if it was our actual universe.  If this was the case, the process of OMD would not follow logically for most of us.  In that Universe, it is a fact that there is an afterlife.  If we lived in a Universe where the after life was an established fact, and not speculation as it is in ours, would there be a reason for good people to fear death?  How different would the story be if rather than trying to bend heaven and earth to save Aunt May, Peter sought out entities to help her transition to the other side?

 

Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Michael Roberts
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 20 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 14857
Posted: 02 January 2008 at 6:28pm | IP Logged | 2  

I must have just missed that generational line. I discovered Spider-Man in
1985-86, and much prefer the unmarried Spider-Man

---

I had been a fan of Spider-Man since I was a little kid through the cartoons,
but I didn't get into the comics until around 1986. At the time, I preferred
the Spider-Man reprints in Marvel Tales to the storylines in the then-current
issues.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Aaron Smith
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 06 September 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 10461
Posted: 02 January 2008 at 6:31pm | IP Logged | 3  

I had been a fan of Spider-Man since I was a little kid through the cartoons,
but I didn't get into the comics until around 1986. At the time, I preferred
the Spider-Man reprints in Marvel Tales to the storylines in the then-current
issues.

 

***

I knew the character from the cartoons when I was 5 or 6, but didn't get into the comics until I was about 8 in 1985. Not much of a difference in time, but at that age, it seems like an eternity.

Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Greg Kirkman
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 May 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 15775
Posted: 02 January 2008 at 6:37pm | IP Logged | 4  

For me, all that crap can be chalked up to a terrible, piss-poor run on ASM ending with a story in the same vein as all those that preceded it for the past eight years. What matters to me is what happens from this point on.

+++++++++

I tend to agree, with reservations.

I'm not buying again. But I do look forward to seeing what results from this. We'll see how it goes.

Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 133317
Posted: 02 January 2008 at 6:37pm | IP Logged | 5  

Here's your basic problem. As EiC, Quesada approved the stuff he is now
supposedly undoing. If he thought the spider-totem and Norman
boinking Gwen were good ideas, why should any hope be held out that
what happens "from this point on" has a chance of being any better?

++

Because that is how life works. We try something, if it doesn't work, we
try soemthing else. Sometimes we make mistakes and don't realize it till
after the fact. Not everybody is perfect.

••

And what a boring world this would be if we were! Nevertheless, I look at
the Big Two over the last, say, twenty five years, right up to the present
day, and I see not merely an absence of an intanglible -- perfection --
but a seeming unwillingness or inability of the people who should be
saying "No" to do so. Spider-totem. Somehow, the Powers That Be
looked at this and said "great idea!"
Back to Top profile | search
 
Greg Kirkman
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 May 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 15775
Posted: 02 January 2008 at 6:38pm | IP Logged | 6  

I'd say that things went off the rails when DeFalco and Frenz were removed
in the midst of the "Gang War" storyline, and the series never fully recovered
after that. Though there have been some good moments since then, of
course.
+++++++++++

That sounds about right.

Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 133317
Posted: 02 January 2008 at 6:40pm | IP Logged | 7  

…I've seen readers in their 40s swearing off the book…

••

Readers who, in a perfect world, would not have been there in the first
place.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Greg Kirkman
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 May 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 15775
Posted: 02 January 2008 at 6:45pm | IP Logged | 8  

How long has it been since things went completely off the rails?

••

Issue 38 was… how long ago?

++++++++++

41 years.

But who's counting?

 

While I certainly agree that nothing matches Lee and Ditko's run, I do feel that many of the follow-up runs (Lee/Romita, Conway/Romita/Kane, Conway/Andru, Stern/Romita Jr., DeFalco/Frenz, etc.) still felt like Spider-Man, even if the character had slowly drifted from his roots over time.

Moving Peter to college was the beginning of a gradual depature. The death of Gwen Stacy was another. Peter graduating from college was another.

None of these events were catastrophic per se, but their gradual, cumulative effect--and the influx of fan-turned-pro writers, has slowly led Spider-Man to where he is now. 

And the marriage got the ball rolling downhill very fast.

 

Aside from some spotty post-marriage stories, that vast majority of the past 20 years' worth of stories don't feel to me like they're part of the same rich tapestry created by Lee, Ditko, Romita, etc. Somehow, it's as if Spider-Man became disconnected from his readers, his own universe, and his and personality.

Nothing in recent stories has led me to say, "Ah-ha! This is the same Peter Parker whom we've known and read about for so long!".



Edited by Greg Kirkman on 02 January 2008 at 6:55pm
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Greg Kirkman
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 May 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 15775
Posted: 02 January 2008 at 6:51pm | IP Logged | 9  

Those of you who got into ASM 'round about the time Peter was dating and ultimately married MJ in the mid-late '80s are pissed.  Those of us who had gotten into ASM a decade or so earlier, who were pissed about the change in status quo from a single Peter to a married one, are now happy that he's single (plus some) again. Damned if you do, damned if you don't.  Y'all had a married Peter Parker for 20 years.  Me, I think it's about time to have the mainstream, flagship title be about the character most people can readily identify with.  I'm back on board.

+++++++++

As usual, I'm something of an oddity. I should be firmly in the "I grew up during the marriage era, therefore I prefer a married Spider-Man" camp, yet I'm not.

I was born a few years before the marriage, and grew up with it (BUT, I read lots of reprints and back issues during my formative years, which gave me a clearer view of Spider-Man's entire history, not just the then-current status quo), and yet I prefer the old stuff, the classic stuff, the single stuff.

Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Matt Reed
Byrne Robotics Security
Avatar
Robotmod

Joined: 16 April 2004
Posts: 35941
Posted: 02 January 2008 at 6:55pm | IP Logged | 10  

Of course that plays into it a lot too, Greg.  Although you may be of a certain age, what you were exposed to first went a long way in defining the character for you.  If you got, say, four issues a month of the current crop of Spider-Man titles in the late 80s, yet were able to read ten times that a month in cheap MARVEL TALES reprints, then it would come as no surprise to me to see you being the age you are and yet preferring the classic Spider-Man to the married one.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Aaron Smith
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 06 September 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 10461
Posted: 02 January 2008 at 6:56pm | IP Logged | 11  

Hey Greg, maybe we just have good taste.
Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Zaki Hasan
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 20 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 8105
Posted: 02 January 2008 at 6:57pm | IP Logged | 12  

I don't think it's a matter of good taste or bad taste, I think it's just personal preference.
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 

<< Prev Page of 146 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login