Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 32 Next >>
Topic: Whatever happened to the X-Men? (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Aaron Smith
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 06 September 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 10461
Posted: 13 December 2007 at 9:30am | IP Logged | 1  

Maybe they need to worry about telling good CURRENT stories instead of revisiting the past so much.
Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Donald Miller
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 03 February 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 3601
Posted: 13 December 2007 at 9:32am | IP Logged | 2  

Oh UUUuughh,

The original version of this series ( Can Ma***l just not do anything new) was part of the problem for me as a reader.  Kitty went from being a down to earth teen dealing with the arrival of new powers an new surroundings to being trained as a Ninja in Japan along side Wolverine....that was just wack.

Don
Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Aaron Smith
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 06 September 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 10461
Posted: 13 December 2007 at 9:37am | IP Logged | 3  

I hate it when they take the things that make it possible for readers to really identify with certain characters and screw it up. It happened with Kitty back then, and the worst example is probably Peter Parker.
Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Michael Penn
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 April 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 12963
Posted: 13 December 2007 at 10:06am | IP Logged | 4  

Stan Lee et al. were definitely aware of moral relativism:

Was this ever applied by them or their immediate followers to Magneto?

Back to Top profile | search
 
Donald Miller
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 03 February 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 3601
Posted: 13 December 2007 at 10:51am | IP Logged | 5  

Stan Lee et al. were definitely aware of moral relativism:

Of course they were.  These men were/are fairly sophisticated guys.  The ideas portrayed within their stories were fairly sophisticated as well. 

That is why I hold that Magneto, because he was portrayed as a megalomaniacal Bigotted Despot literally from day one.  Should have stayed one.

The guy was and is EVIL, a bad person, just a dick.  He was not about saving the mutants from mankind, so much as enslaving mankind for the benefit of mutants. 
It is a minor but important distinction.  He could spout the philosophies all day long, but ultimately he was just a bad guy.

It's along the lines of reinterpreting Green Goblin as having Multiple personality disorder. No, he just banged his head and forgot.  not the same thing.

Don
D-
Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Greg Woronchak
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 04 September 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 1631
Posted: 13 December 2007 at 10:54am | IP Logged | 6  

Witness the success of the Spider-Man and X-Men movie franchises.

Well, the movies are successful because they're mindless popcorn flicks, and the tiny die-hard comic book fan will see them no matter what.

I feel sorry if after the movie, kids try and pick up the latest issue of Spidey or X-men, trying to decipher the morass of characters and continuity.

Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Victor Rodgers
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 26 December 2004
Posts: 3508
Posted: 13 December 2007 at 10:57am | IP Logged | 7  

I think Magneto's thing is he does not care if mutants are free, so long as he is the guy ruling them.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Paulo Pereira
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 24 April 2006
Posts: 15539
Posted: 13 December 2007 at 10:59am | IP Logged | 8  


 QUOTE:
I think Magneto's thing is he does not care if mutants are free, so long as he is the guy ruling them.

Exactly.  He wants mutantkind to rule the earth and he wants to rule mutantkind.

Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 134706
Posted: 13 December 2007 at 11:15am | IP Logged | 9  

That is why I hold that Magneto, because he was portrayed as a
megalomaniacal Bigotted Despot literally from day one. Should have
stayed one.

••

Stan understood contrasts. He could give us Doctor Doom, whom he
ultimately chose to cast as "noble" with his own code of ethics, and that
allowed him to give us Magneto, who was a total S.O.B. He could give us
Doctor Octopus, who was a "tragic" villain, and a few issues later
Sandman, who was at the very least a multiple-murderer!

Stan liked to write "layered" characters -- but he understood that not
everybody is layered!
Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 134706
Posted: 13 December 2007 at 11:18am | IP Logged | 10  

As I understand it, sales have been increasing steadily for the last half-
decade or so…

••

Sales increased exponentially during the speculator boom. Unfortunately,
when the speculators departed, we learned the number of readers
had actually decreased.

The Big Two are now embarked on a deliberate campaign to lure back
speculators, and sales would seem to show they are being successful.
When the speculators lose interest again, we will see how many of those
increased sales corresponded to an increase in warm bodies.
Back to Top profile | search
 
John Wyatt
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 25 December 2006
Posts: 125
Posted: 13 December 2007 at 12:45pm | IP Logged | 11  


 QUOTE:
As I understand it, sales have been increasing steadily for the last half-
decade or so…

••

Sales increased exponentially during the speculator boom. Unfortunately,
when the speculators departed, we learned the number of readers
had actually decreased.

The Big Two are now embarked on a deliberate campaign to lure back
speculators, and sales would seem to show they are being successful.
When the speculators lose interest again, we will see how many of those
increased sales corresponded to an increase in warm bodies.

It may not be necessary to wait that long.  Speculators don't have much need to buy trade paperbacks and evemn less to buy multiple copies of trades, and that is the fastest growing segment of comics publishing, and the one which retailers like Borders has the most interest in.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Matt Reed
Byrne Robotics Security
Avatar
Robotmod

Joined: 16 April 2004
Posts: 36364
Posted: 13 December 2007 at 12:50pm | IP Logged | 12  

Consider also that a ton of trades, from the ESSENTIALS line to ARCHIVES to SHOWCASE and recent releases like JB's FF, are targeting longtime readers.  Much of this material is being published for the first time, or if not the first time in a much less expensive format than was previously available.  How much of those sales are actually bringing in new blood, people who will continue to purchase comics in whatever format, and how many of those sales are to people like me who has been collecting comics for 30+ years and has recently dove headfirst into buying TBP collections because I've never read the issues being collected or want a nice shelf edition to replace my individual copies?  In other words, are the strong sales of TBP actually representative of a resurgence of some sort in comics, or are they selling to people who were already a part of the community?
Back to Top profile | search
 

<< Prev Page of 32 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login