Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 21 Next >>
Topic: Jim Shooter’s views on homosexuality in comics (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Jesus Garcia
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 10 April 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 2414
Posted: 13 September 2007 at 10:15pm | IP Logged | 1  

An interesting sideline is that, in the novelization for 1979's Star Trek: The Motion Picture, the writer appended a message from James T. Kirk -- written from the future -- were Kirk disclaimed any sexual relationship with Mr. Spock. He pointed out, among other things, the disadvantage of pursuing a physical relationship with someone who only comes into sexual heat every 7 years.

Apparently this was in response to the contention by some gay interest groups that the Kirk/Spock relationship was one of the greatest love stories of all time.

Now, I don't see Kirk/Spock in that way, but some of the red shirts seemed to me to give each other rather lingering looks.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Peter Svensson
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 30 January 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 1470
Posted: 13 September 2007 at 10:19pm | IP Logged | 2  

Greg, the issue is that in real life people who on the surface appear to be firmly heterosexual end up being homosexuals in denial. It happens. It's just that Whedon didn't pull it off well.
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Stephen Robinson
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 5835
Posted: 14 September 2007 at 8:07am | IP Logged | 3  

Since Xander and Willow were both firmly established as heterosexuals, I don't think it would have worked with Xander any more than it did with Willow. The bottom line is that it would have been a major u-turn no matter how it was done, one that smacked of a writer forcing the characters to act out-of-character.

Perhaps Whedon should have introduced a brand-new character who was gay (like Tara), instead of forcing one of the regulars into a mold that didn't fit what had gone before.

************

SER: I agree. The reason I mentioned Xander is that he would have made more sense for such a revelation. Willow definitely didn't. And I think it did more harm than good -- presenting her sexuality has some sort of light switch. For instance, an episode in the final season had Willow interested in a guy (based on a spell) and the reaction was "you're a lesbian," as if she'd never been interested -- genuinely interested, as in making out with and such -- in a man.

Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Bill Dowling
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 07 July 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 2176
Posted: 14 September 2007 at 8:52am | IP Logged | 4  

Greg, the issue is that in real life people who on the surface appear to be firmly heterosexual end up being homosexuals in denial. It happens. It's just that Whedon didn't pull it off well.
********************************
But they appear that way because we don't have the insight into their feelings that we get from fiction. We saw Willow's longing looks at Xander, we saw Willow's heartache when things were going wrong with Oz.
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
David Ferguson
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 17 March 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 6782
Posted: 14 September 2007 at 9:07am | IP Logged | 5  

Its a similar story with Dr Weaver in ER.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Aleksei Green
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 20 July 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 640
Posted: 14 September 2007 at 9:15am | IP Logged | 6  

Mr. Byrne mentioned that transsexual lesbians were 'castrated heterosexuals'.  I think there should be more trans characters in comics. Coagula was killed off and retconned out of continuity. I was hoping that maybe she would be made into an amazon on paradise island someday. A well written trans character would be most welcome in comics. The general public seems to only have the Jerry Springer idea of transsexual people.
Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 133317
Posted: 14 September 2007 at 9:24am | IP Logged | 7  

Thing is, how is a transgender character to be protrayed in a "regular" comic? (Setting aside the fact that, like many psychologists, I don't accept the whole idea of "transgender".) A Gay character can have a same-sex partner, a la Maggie Sawyer, and that's a quick and easy shorthand even without showing them in the sack. But transgender would quickly become what the character is about, as it is something that would have to be constantly referenced. Unless we went for a cliche, like a truck-driver in a dress -- but even then, he could just be a cross-dresser.

If there was a transgender character who basically had to announce this fact every time she/he appeared, it would become like the 90s joke about vocal homosexuals, "When did the love that dare not speak its name become the love that won't shut up?"

Back to Top profile | search
 
Aleksei Green
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 20 July 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 640
Posted: 14 September 2007 at 9:29am | IP Logged | 8  

Rachel Pollack created a great out trans character in coagula. She used the storyline to address gender issues.  In my view that character was a great addition to the doom patrol mythos.  The character was realistically portrayed and could have been like one's neighbour next door.
Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 133317
Posted: 14 September 2007 at 9:34am | IP Logged | 9  

How did you know the character was transgender?

(And, since I'm getting an odd vibe from some of these posts -- you all know that Pollack is a transgender, right?)
Back to Top profile | search
 
Paul Greer
Byrne Robotics Security
Avatar

Joined: 18 August 2004
Posts: 14191
Posted: 14 September 2007 at 9:40am | IP Logged | 10  

My mother always told me, "You learn something new every day of your life."
Back to Top profile | search
 
Aaron Smith
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 06 September 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 10461
Posted: 14 September 2007 at 9:41am | IP Logged | 11  

She used the storyline to address gender issues. 

***

 That's fine, but what about future storylines? The character being transgendered isn't something that can be so easily made known to new readers without clumsily inserted reminders. If a character appears in a serialized story, occassionally things must be shown or mentioned to let new readers have the information that is vital to the characters.

 A long time reader of Spider-Man, for example, would know that Peter Parker is a photographer, but a new reader will only know this through reading scenes in which Peter takes pictures, or mentions it. Inserting a photography scene is easy. Inserting events or conversations in which the audience is reminded of the character being transgendered isn't so easy. 

Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Aleksei Green
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 20 July 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 640
Posted: 14 September 2007 at 9:43am | IP Logged | 12  

Well Rachel made it clear in the beginning that Coagula aka Kate Godwin was a trans woman. Coagula received her powers after having sex with Rebis.  Those Doom Patrol issues were not only inovative in dealing with gender issues, but dealt with many social 'taboos'.  Kind of like Neil Gaiman's SANDMAN in making the reader really think after finishing the issue.
Back to Top profile | search
 

<< Prev Page of 21 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login