| Author |
|
Dwayne Gassmann Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: 22 September 2006 Location: United States Posts: 3448
|
| Posted: 09 December 2009 at 8:25pm | IP Logged | 1
|
post reply
|
|
Just wondering, do you guys prefer the pics or just a link?
I personally prefer the link, but did the pics because I thought it was easier for the forum.
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
| www
|
| |
Dwayne Gassmann Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: 22 September 2006 Location: United States Posts: 3448
|
| Posted: 09 December 2009 at 8:28pm | IP Logged | 2
|
post reply
|
|
I know the smaller size was done to cut cost, not sure the consumer is seeing it, but these remind me of when I was a kid. Only they were Star Wars. The articulation is definitely better.
My son really likes them, which is kind of the target audience.
Edited by Dwayne Gassmann on 09 December 2009 at 8:30pm
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
| www
|
| |
Brad Krawchuk Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: 19 June 2006 Location: Canada Posts: 5814
|
| Posted: 09 December 2009 at 8:30pm | IP Logged | 3
|
post reply
|
|
Michael - I'm not spending 2-3 times as much per figure from Hasbro than I spent just a couple short years ago from Toy Biz, especially since the majority of figures released by Hasbro were already released by Toy Biz.
Hasbro charges as much for their 3.75" line as Toy Biz used to charge for their 6" line. I paid 9 buck a pop for the figures from the Sentinel series in 2006. The Hulk figures from last year would cost me 27 dollars each.
Um, no.
Marvel Legends are dead and done and gone. I'm getting rid of the ones I have, probably making a tidy profit since they're so much better than the crap Hasbro is putting out, and I'm throwing in the towel on Marvel toys the way I've thrown in the towel on their comics. Call me in 5 years when they do something smart to get my business back.
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
e-mail
|
| |
Michael Roberts Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: 20 April 2004 Location: United States Posts: 14890
|
| Posted: 09 December 2009 at 9:04pm | IP Logged | 4
|
post reply
|
|
Hasbro charges as much for their 3.75" line as Toy Biz used to charge for their 6" line.
---
I wouldn't place all of that on Hasbro. It seems that toys are shifting back to the 3.75" scale from the 6" scale, while increasing in price. The 6" scale is becoming more for adult collectors. And also increasing in price.
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
| |
Brad Krawchuk Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: 19 June 2006 Location: Canada Posts: 5814
|
| Posted: 09 December 2009 at 9:22pm | IP Logged | 5
|
post reply
|
|
Hasbro makes GIJoe at 3.75" and Star Wars at 3.75". Outside of Transformers (also, incidentally, a Hasbro brand) which doesn't necessarily have a scale to adhere to, they make the majority of 3.75" action-figures on the market today.
They are in the driver's seat on this. Who else controls that market? Mattel? Their 6" DC figures were in response to Marvel Legends, and their 3.75" figures are in response to Hasbro's shift to that scale.
When you say "toys are shifting back to 3.75" scale" it's because Hasbro is the one doing the shift. They ARE TOYS. Name another brand that dominates the market like Star Wars or GIJoe or Transformers. Of course they'd take Marvel in that direction when they got the rights! I guarantee if Marvel Toys (nee Toy Biz) still had control, there would still be a 6" line almost exclusively, and there wouldn't have been the tidal shift toward 3.75"
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
e-mail
|
| |
Michael Roberts Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: 20 April 2004 Location: United States Posts: 14890
|
| Posted: 09 December 2009 at 9:38pm | IP Logged | 6
|
post reply
|
|
I saw the 6" figures as a response to what McFarlane Toys was doing. Now other than the sports figures, their toys are shrinking, with 3" and 5.5" toys.
DC Infinite Heroes was announced at SDCC 2007, while Marvel Universe was announced at SDCC 2008, so while Mattel may have been attempting to compete with Hasbro's G.I. Joe and Star Wars figures, they weren't responding to the shift from Marvel Legends to Marvel Universe.
I think all of this had more to do with the price of petroleum a couple of years ago, rather than whether Toy Biz or Hasbro was running things.
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
| |
David Ferguson Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: 17 March 2007 Location: Ireland Posts: 6782
|
| Posted: 10 December 2009 at 7:59am | IP Logged | 7
|
post reply
|
|
I'm not going to collect Marvel characters again as long as Hasbro is running them into the ground. *** They're terrible. I refuse to buy them.
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
| |
John Peter Britton Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: 17 May 2006 Location: United Kingdom Posts: 9129
|
| Posted: 10 December 2009 at 12:06pm | IP Logged | 8
|
post reply
|
|
Not Bad!
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
e-mail
|
| |
John Peter Britton Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: 17 May 2006 Location: United Kingdom Posts: 9129
|
| Posted: 10 December 2009 at 12:12pm | IP Logged | 9
|
post reply
|
|
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
e-mail
|
| |
John Peter Britton Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: 17 May 2006 Location: United Kingdom Posts: 9129
|
| Posted: 10 December 2009 at 12:12pm | IP Logged | 10
|
post reply
|
|
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
e-mail
|
| |
Anthony Frail Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: 09 October 2007 Posts: 960
|
| Posted: 10 December 2009 at 1:11pm | IP Logged | 11
|
post reply
|
|
I'm disappointed that the Iron Man 2 figures are 3.75" as well. I would have liked that red and gold Iron Man. Alas.
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
| |
Eric Smearman Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: 02 September 2006 Location: United States Posts: 5880
|
| Posted: 10 December 2009 at 1:27pm | IP Logged | 12
|
post reply
|
|
That horrid Cyclops figure on the last page looks like the sculptors envisioned Scott being portrayed by Jack Palance!
|
| Back to Top |
profile
| search
e-mail
|
| |