Posted: June 17 2006 at 12:48am | IP Logged | 1
|
|
|
David Miller: Marvel had no right to the physical
artwork.
****
John Byrne: Yes, they did. And everyone
understood this. Then
the law changed.
++++
Mark Evanier: I have a copy of a letter from a Marvel lawyer to
Kirby's lawyer,
dated 1968. It's a response to a request from Jack -- and apparently
not the first one -- for the original art to be returned to him.”
****
Me: Gee, I bet Jack couldn’t understand why he couldn’t have his pages
from this wonderful company – hell-- Steranko had a special relationship with
Stan and got his back. Neal Adams always wanted his art back, and has said
he couldn’t understand why either…..
++++
David Miller: It wasn't the fans who
reneged on agreements with
Steve Ditko.
****
John Byrne: Which "agreements" were these?
++++
Mark Evanier: From what I've been able to ascertain,
Kirby was led to believe
that he would be compensated in two ways. One was in a share of all
merchandising income (Ditko was apparently promised this, as well)
modeled on the old Simon-Kirby deal for Captain America.
The other
was a bit more complicated but it was basically that, if and when
Goodman sold the company, the underlying rights to the characters that
Kirby had created or co-created would not transfer unless Kirby was
involved in the deal and received a share. None of this happened.
****
John Byrne: Not if a court of law
says it isn't. Jesus, get a fucking
clue!!!
++++
Me: Just because a court of law ‘says’ it, doesn’t mean it really wasn’t
theft. A court of law said OJ didn’t kill his wife. Jesus, stop being so
fucking naïve!!!
****
David Miller: My point was that DC
and Marvel should be blamed
for casting off the creators.
++++
John Byrne: Neither company casts of creators whose work still
sells.
****
Paraphrased from Mark Evanier: In the late sixties Martin Goodman became
aware of just how much work Kirby was doing for the company and realized that
they were paying out rather a lot because of this. Goodman therefore
tried to cut Kirby's rate. It was never implemented because Jack
threatened to quit if
they did.
Me: Jack eventually did quit shortly after because the new
contract he’d have to sign would make him say he didn’t really create
characters, and other thoroughly demeaning things.
I think that’s pretty close to casting off a creator
who sells.
Edited by Anthony Vincent Taliaferro on June 17 2006 at 12:57am
|