Author |
|
Mike Bunge Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: June 10 2004 Location: United States Posts: 1335
|
Posted: May 01 2006 at 11:19am | IP Logged | 1
|
|
|
"Ellis currently writes Fell, Desolation Jones, Jack Cross, Blackgas, and just finished Down. None of those are superhero books. So saying, "And, apparently, he can't get a job writing anything else." is more than disingenuous, it's just flatly untrue."
"Can't get a job" is untrue. "Can't make a living at writing anything else" is probably pretty on the mark.
As someone who used to frequent Ellis' old Delphi place, let me tell you that disdain and disgust for super-heroes themselves and not just their dominance of the marketplace was overflowing at that place and most of it either came directly from Ellis or was egged on by him. Now granted, that animosity was mixed together with anger over market dominance and work-for-hire, but negativity about super-heroes themselves was undeniable.
Having said that, it wouldn't surprise me to find out that Ellis does have some affection for the super-hero genre. He's always struck me as having a bit of the overly educated fanboy who bitches about the comics he can't stop himself from reading in him.
Mike
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
David Blot Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: August 22 2005 Location: France Posts: 858
|
Posted: May 01 2006 at 11:23am | IP Logged | 2
|
|
|
Jb wrote : Westerns can be done as dark, adult stories, or comedies, or
funny animals.
---
Allow me a theory here. Westerns for a while, even the darkest one like
Anthony MANN masterpieces for example, were about heroes and
heroism. Nearly all the time. That were the John FORD movies, as classic
as what Stan & Jack did.
Then, late 60's, the western genre seems a bit passé, wich much less big
success. And ooops, out of nowhere (well - not really) came the Spaghetti
Westerns. What they were about ? Unheroic characters, killing in the back,
sadism, erotism and nastiness.
What people were complaining about ? Exactly the same thing, sometimes
with the same words, like what people complain here about recent comics
(or if you prefer post Moore/Miller).
You also have this funny allegory of the english writers in the role of the
italian directors, Grant Morrison as Sergio LEONE, and let's say Joe
Quesada as Sam PECKINPAH (ok - I'm over the top here, but that means a
us artist taking inspiration of what european were doing with US stuff)
Now, you still have a lot of people hating those westerns (my favorite
movie dictionnary by Jacques Lourcelles, states that both GODARD for
different reasons, and LEONE are the killers of the movie medium - of
course I don't agree with him).
My point of view here is that I do with comics what I do with movies. I
enjoy as much BEND OF THE RIVER, than THE MAN WHO KILLED LIBERTY
VALANCE and ONCE UPON THE TIME IN THE WEST - Yes, even, or
especially, when goold ol blue eyed US Super star HENRY FONDA kills the
child at the early beginning - wich was the abolute anthesis of anything
Fonda was about in the earlier westerns.
You can say that the italian directors killed the western genre with all
those unheroic characters. But you can also say that the western genre
was already in the grave (compared to what it was in the 50's) and the
italians give it the last 'salvo of honnor' with talent and originality.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Mike Bunge Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: June 10 2004 Location: United States Posts: 1335
|
Posted: May 01 2006 at 11:23am | IP Logged | 3
|
|
|
"I thought the usual complaint was writer's writing comics when they really want to be writing something else. Never heard of someone being criticized for actually wanting to write comics."
The criticism isn't about wanting to write comics. It's about wanting to write other genres or about certain subject matters and then trying to graft that genre or subject matter onto classic super-heroes.
Then there's guys who clearly don't want to be writing comics because they don't write COMICS, they write screenplays for which they have artists create storyboards.
Mike
Edited by Mike Bunge on May 01 2006 at 11:25am
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Stephen Robinson Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: April 16 2004 Location: United States Posts: 5833
|
Posted: May 01 2006 at 11:37am | IP Logged | 4
|
|
|
Nowhere does it say superheroes have to be only adolescent wish fulfillment, however.
**********************
Not *only* but that is much of the root of the characters. Now instead of Batman being a superheroic Willy Wonka who introduces an orphaned boy to a world of fun, he's a borderline child abuser who is so strict and stern, it's a wonder the kid doesn't go nuts. In other words, Batman changed from being your kindly uncle to the worst teacher you ever had.
Every negative change that's occurred in superhero comics is a result, I would argue, of forgetting the core of superhero comics (the adolescent wish fulfillment). So the Hulk becomes a wisecrackin' Pretty Boy, Spider-Man gets married, and s on.
******************************
And as any married person would know, the girl trouble doesn't necessarily stop when the guy gets the girl.
*************************
As a kid, I was (and still am) a huge Police fan. I thought "King of Pain" and "Hole in My Life" were written about me. However, I recall the moment I learned that Sting was married with kids. Suddenly, he wasn't "me" -- he was an adult. And then it seemed odd that he was "whining" about his life. Yes, I realize that adults have problems but as a kid, the last thing you want to see are those problems (especially since you have no control over what happens in your own parents relationships).
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
| www
|
|
Jason Schulman Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: July 08 2004 Location: United States Posts: 2473
|
Posted: May 01 2006 at 11:37am | IP Logged | 5
|
|
|
QUOTE:
why did he have to go to the US to be
published while most of the other british writers were more than able
to build their carrers on UK itself? |
|
|
The comics market in the UK has collapsed to an even greater degree than in the US, no? And didn't it collapse earlier?
What JB says is true regarding the rules of the superhero genre, but I think there are other genre-conventions which have irritated contemporary writers:
1) characters must never change very much (this seems to have been abandoned; unfortunately, this has not been a good thing where the mainstream books are concerned)
2) characters must not have explicit political viewpoints (even Green Arrow's leftism is pretty vague, and Hawkman's conservatism was even vaguer), and by extension,
3) characters must not get involved in real-world politics, i.e. must not try to tackle real-world problems in a serious way, because this would affect the shared universe (the Wildstorm universe is the big exception to this rule -- the Authority started overthrowing dictators around the world and even took over the U.S.).
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Andrew Bitner Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: June 01 2004 Location: United States Posts: 7562
|
Posted: May 01 2006 at 11:38am | IP Logged | 6
|
|
|
Moving a character from "single" to "married" cuts down a lot of options. There are great things about being married-- I'm still (barely) a newlywed myself-- but as a kid, I would never have identified with the problems of married people; they were just too remote from my experience. (And yeah, I realize the absurdity of the situation, given a medium where we routinely visit other worlds, other races, etc. and face villains from Batroc to Galactus, but still... sometimes the mundane difficulties are the ones that are trickiest to evoke.)
In the sense that Superman and Spider-Man were created to *be* adolescent wish fulfillment, then that remains their primary raison d'etre. Shaping them into something else removes a chunk of what makes them resonate with readers-- they no longer have to worry about getting a date or liking two girls at once or how even to speak to the girl they have a crush on (yeah, a superhero who can lift a truck being powerless to talk to a pretty girl-- not a problem when you're married but dang interesting otherwise). Why take that away? Why remove the dilemma of "I have to go save the world... but have to stand up Girlfriend X to do it! How will I explain?"
When Girlfriend X is Wife X, she understands (usually) and forgives (usually)... so what's the dramatic conflict? The chance that enemies will find and use her as a hostage? How is that worse than the possibility of them grabbing Girlfriend X? If anything, Wife X is probably safer (with apologies to Sue Dibny), because creators may be more reluctant to bump off a wife than a girlfriend.
This is a long-winded answer, I know, but marriage in the two cases cited did not improve the books and might have cost them potential readers.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Mike Bunge Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: June 10 2004 Location: United States Posts: 1335
|
Posted: May 01 2006 at 11:39am | IP Logged | 7
|
|
|
"If guys like Ellis, Morrison, Bendis are such writing geniuses, why haven't they found much success outside of comics?"
Well, those guys all clearly have talent and skill. And of the three, Morrison strikes me as the one most likely to keep doing comics when he could do other things.
However, the reason why guys like Ellis and Bendis haven't been able to find a lot of success outside of comics is probably because it's so much tougher. As rough as the comic industry is, the other visual mediums (TV and movies) have two big hurdles to overcome.
1. There's no equivalent in TV or moves to the indy comic creator putting together his own book and using it to sell himself to the big publishers. If a creator can draw, he can do the entire book himself or with a handful of other people. Doing an independent film or putting together a TV pilot is a far more involved and expensive proposition.
2. There's very little in TV or movies to equate with the super-hero franchises. If you shmooze the right people in comics, you can be handed a Fantastic Four or Spider-Man book to do and become a huge figure in the industry, even if you have zero experience writing comics. Try and get a job writing for Law and Order or writing the next James Bond movie with zero experience in either TV or movies.
I think it's also likely that few comic creators have it in them to write an entire novel like JB and others.
All of which explains how people who really want to do something else end up doing comics.
Mike
Edited by Mike Bunge on May 01 2006 at 11:45am
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
John Mietus Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: April 16 2004 Location: United States Posts: 9697
|
Posted: May 01 2006 at 11:40am | IP Logged | 8
|
|
|
Mike Bunge wrote:
The criticism isn't about wanting to write comics. It's
about wanting to write other genres or about certain subject matters and
then trying to graft that genre or subject matter onto classic super-heroes. |
|
|
Thank you, Mike -- that is exactly the point I was trying to make and was
having difficulty articulating at five in the morning after having just woken
up.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Mike Bunge Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: June 10 2004 Location: United States Posts: 1335
|
Posted: May 01 2006 at 11:44am | IP Logged | 9
|
|
|
"The comics market in the UK has collapsed to an even greater degree than in the US, no? And didn't it collapse earlier?"
Has anyone ever studied the UK comic industry and its problems? It would be interesting to examine what effect outside economic forces had on the industry vs. attitudinal changes in creators and the audience. In other words, did the storytelling styles embodied by Ellis, Moore and Morrison actually contribute to the decline of UK comics? And has that style, while perhaps very appealing at first, had the same effect on US comics?
Mike
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Patrick Drury Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: December 14 2005 Posts: 695
|
Posted: May 01 2006 at 11:46am | IP Logged | 10
|
|
|
It took me thirty seconds and a Google search to find an instance of Ellis saying he "hated" super heroes. In the same interview he said Planetary was his last word on them. That was several years prior to his runs on Ultimate Fantastic Four, Iron Man, JLA, NextWave, and the Ultimate Trilogy.
Ellis has also routinely refered to himself as a whore. I think Ellis will ultimately do whatever is good for Ellis when it comes to writing comics. I don't think he feels any particular affection for Marvel or DC's trademark characters, so he'll hate them, and write them, and cash the checks as he sees fit. Do with that what you will. If both companies are willing to pay him for his work, I can't really fault him for putting his career first.
I used to really like his work. These days the cliche's shine through a bit too much for me. Nextwave is kind of fun if you can get past all the Ellisisms.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
Patrick Drury Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: December 14 2005 Posts: 695
|
Posted: May 01 2006 at 11:51am | IP Logged | 11
|
|
|
"If guys like Ellis, Morrison, Bendis are such writing geniuses, why haven't they found much success outside of comics?"
I'm pretty sure all three have stated an affinity for the medium of comics and prefer working in it.
That being said, Morrison has written for TV and the stage, Ellis has written for video games, TV, and is working on a novel I believe. And I think Bendis has done some television and film writing.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
John Mietus Byrne Robotics Member

Joined: April 16 2004 Location: United States Posts: 9697
|
Posted: May 01 2006 at 11:57am | IP Logged | 12
|
|
|
Valerie Finnigan wrote:
Nowhere does it say superheroes have to be only
adolescent wish fulfillment, however |
|
|
True, it can be the source of interminable Mary Sue fan-fic as well.
|
Back to Top |
profile
| search
|
|
|
|