Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum Page of 4 Next >>
Topic: Inspiration vs Ripped Off (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Eric Russ
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 13 March 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 2006
Posted: 06 April 2006 at 8:57pm | IP Logged | 1  

Hi everybody -

How would you define the difference between
plagiarism and being"inspired" by someone else's
work?

Or maybe I should say "ripping" off an idea - being
that plagarim is trying to pass the original work off as
your own - What limits should a person place on
their "inspirations" so that they do not reach the
realms of "ripped off?"

Back to Top profile | search
 
Jay Matthews
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 11 October 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 2468
Posted: 06 April 2006 at 9:02pm | IP Logged | 2  

Well, if you consider the example of the Swamp Thing and Man Thing, the critical difference between inspiration and ripoff seems to be a sort of dangling snout-like trunk.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Robert Cosgrove
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 January 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 1710
Posted: 06 April 2006 at 9:05pm | IP Logged | 3  

Jay, I may be obtuse but I don't get your reply.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Stephen Rockwood
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 1255
Posted: 06 April 2006 at 9:08pm | IP Logged | 4  

The difference between inspiration and a rip-off is that those who are inspired come up with their own ideas founded on the inspiration.  A rip-off is when someone looks at something someone else has done, decides to do the same exact thing and claims they came up with it.
Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Jay Matthews
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 11 October 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 2468
Posted: 06 April 2006 at 9:08pm | IP Logged | 5  

You're not obtuse.  I'm just a smart aleck. 

Swamp Thing and Man-Thing seem to clearly fall in the rip off category.  There's a story behind that, but Man-Thing's dangly snout is one of the few differences in them.

On some level, I guess I'm suggesting that if you get too close, it's a rip off no matter what.  Go ahead and be "inspired," but you have to come up with something truly different or it's a rip off.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Charles Nago
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 23 January 2006
Posts: 191
Posted: 06 April 2006 at 9:12pm | IP Logged | 6  

"Come up with something truly different or it's a ripp off."

Well, I guess by that standard most of comics are "ripp offs."
Back to Top profile | search
 
Didier Yvon Paul Fayolle
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 25 January 2005
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 5254
Posted: 06 April 2006 at 9:19pm | IP Logged | 7  

In no time someone is going to say that everything has already been made and we are just .... recycling !

 

Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Jason Czeskleba
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 30 April 2004
Posts: 4653
Posted: 06 April 2006 at 9:27pm | IP Logged | 8  

Swamp Thing and Man-Thing were created at the same time, independently of each other; neither was a copy of the other.  Swamp Thing was created by Len Wein and Berni Wrightson, Man-Thing by Gerry Conway and Roy Thomas.  Surprisingly, Wein and Conway were roommates at the time, but they both report they have no recollection of discussing the characters at the time they were being developed, so any similarity is a coincidence.  Or more likely it's due to the fact both characters were largely inspired by an earlier character called the Heap:

I wouldn't say Man-Thing's snout is the only difference, either.  The fact that Swamp Thing retains his human intellect while Man-Thing is completely mindless is a pretty significant difference.



Edited by Jason Czeskleba on 06 April 2006 at 9:30pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Jay Matthews
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 11 October 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 2468
Posted: 06 April 2006 at 9:30pm | IP Logged | 9  

That's what I meant when I said "there's a story behind that."  Despite all that (and Conway has been backtracking a bit and pointing the finger at Wein), they didn't end up with a product that has enough differences.  Not just the appearance, but the origins, stories, etc.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Jason Czeskleba
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 30 April 2004
Posts: 4653
Posted: 06 April 2006 at 9:41pm | IP Logged | 10  

Jay, you responded before I edited to add my comment about the characters' respective intellects.  Anyway, the characters' intellect is a notable difference.  Have you read many of the stories from the original runs of those characters?  I think they are quite different in approach, tone, and structure.  The fact that Man-Thing is mindless means the stories almost always focus on the people he meets rather than himself, whereas the Swamp Thing stories are more conventional in their focus on Swamp Thing, his thoughts and actions.  Certainly the characters' origins and abilities are similar, but the stories themselves are quite different.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Jay Matthews
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 11 October 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 2468
Posted: 06 April 2006 at 9:48pm | IP Logged | 11  

Concur on that point.  But if it weren't for that, it would be completely laughable.  I mean, you even have the magic element taking over the stories.  For Swamp Thing, it was Arcane and Abby, and with Man-Thing, I forget but there was the wizard and girl. 

Both companies came up with a good product, and made some good stories without copying each other.  But the average person would look at it as potential rip off stuff.

I have a recent Conway interview where he starts to stick to the party line about coincidence, then he says --but Man-Thing was first, and I brought the drawings home, and Len saw them.  And the next thing I know there's a Swamp Thing coming out, but I'm not saying he copied the idea. 

That's not a quote, it's a paraphrase.

Edited to add the word "not," as in Conway said "I'm not saying he copied the idea."


Edited by Jay Matthews on 07 April 2006 at 4:57am
Back to Top profile | search
 
Emery Calame
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 5773
Posted: 07 April 2006 at 1:31am | IP Logged | 12  

Swamp Thing and Manthing are both sort of derivative of the Heap aren't they?
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 

Page of 4 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login