Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 18 Next >>
Topic: Q for Mr. Byrne: Jim Shooter (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Steven Myers
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 10 June 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 5685
Posted: 09 February 2006 at 10:07pm | IP Logged | 1  

who would you rather have running Marvel right now, Joe Quesada or Jim Shooter?

The lesser of two evils is still evil.

I'll never forgive Shooter for Hank Pym (which I believe was his way of showing Claremont/Byrne the "proper" way to turn a good guy into a bad guy.) and I was reading very few Marvel comics by the end of Shooter's run.  The guys I liked had all left or lost their way it seemed...

Quesada totally drove me away from Marvel.  Or actually, I didn't leave Marvel...Marvel left me.

Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Ron Sluyter
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 07 January 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 1867
Posted: 09 February 2006 at 10:12pm | IP Logged | 2  

Mark me down as someone brought into comics by Secret Wars.  At the time I was 12 years old was occasionally reading comics.  After picking up Secret Wars #1 I became hooked on Marvel.  Secret Wars was the spark that made me check out the Fantastic Four, Spiderman and the X Men and beg my parents to take me to the comic store to look for back issues.  I actually met Jim Shooter at a comic convention a couple of years ago and thanked him for that and am unapolgetic about it.  Of course Secret Wars II was quite a letdown, but I still can go back to the first series and it puts a smile on my face. 
Back to Top profile | search
 
Victor Rodgers
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 26 December 2004
Posts: 3508
Posted: 09 February 2006 at 10:22pm | IP Logged | 3  

In Marvel Age, Shooter said the New Universe had nothing to do with the Beyonder.

Edited by Victor .R. Rodgers on 09 February 2006 at 10:23pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Daniel Gillotte
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 11 October 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 2662
Posted: 09 February 2006 at 11:51pm | IP Logged | 4  

The little glimpse of the New Mutants on that SW II cover made me wonder...
what were/ are JB's thoughts on the New Mutants?

I liked them quite a lot until they turned into they began to transform into
X-force... Especially the first couple of years.

Dan
Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Chris Hutton
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 11667
Posted: 10 February 2006 at 1:22am | IP Logged | 5  

Shooter/Quesada? I'd rather have that guy... whatshisname? Oh, yeah... STAN LEE!
Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Michael Connell
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 13 January 2006
Posts: 4026
Posted: 10 February 2006 at 1:38am | IP Logged | 6  

If we're picking fantasy EIC's for Marvel, can you imagine today's "talent" having to face Martin Goodman? I can hear that conversation now. "You want to have your hero get drunk and kill someone?!" "Do you even understand what a hero IS?!!?"
Back to Top profile | search
 
Rob Hewitt
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 11 May 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 10182
Posted: 10 February 2006 at 7:55am | IP Logged | 7  

I have a feeling Martin Goodman would have done whatever would have sold. Which of ocurse given the time period, and restrictions, would not have been some stuff done now.

Edited by Rob Hewitt on 10 February 2006 at 7:55am
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Matt Hawes
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 16502
Posted: 10 February 2006 at 9:41am | IP Logged | 8  

Considering that when Martin Goodman sold off Marvel, he started publishing comics as Atlas-Seaboard, Goodman might not be the best choice, were he still with us. As Rob, notes, Goodman was known for following trends.
Back to Top profile | search | www
 
James C. Taylor
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 4705
Posted: 10 February 2006 at 9:49am | IP Logged | 9  

In fact, it is Goodman's propensity for following trends that created the Marvel Age of comics (as Marvelites call it) since the Fantastic Four was created in direct response to DC's success with the Justice League of America.
Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Matt Hawes
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 16502
Posted: 10 February 2006 at 10:01am | IP Logged | 10  

Yeah, but if pretty much anyone else other than Stan Lee and Jack Kirby had tackled that assignment, it would'nt have flown, I'd wager.

As I understand it, Atlas-Seaboard was Goodman's attempt, in part (and partly because of how he believed his son was mistreated at Marvel after he sold the company), to prove that he was the genius behind Marvel Comics's success in the 1960's, not Stan Lee, Jack Kirby, or Steve Ditko.

Following trends, alone, does not make one successful, and certainly not revolutionary. What made Marvel soar was that Stan Lee only loosely followed his boss's order, and went on to create something unique with his partner, Kirby.

Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Gregg Allinson
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 4252
Posted: 10 February 2006 at 10:03am | IP Logged | 11  

Yes and no.  Yes in the sense that Goodman wanted a superhero title.  No in the sense that it was Lee and Kirby who made that superhero title work.  As I've always heard the tale, Goodman wanted to revive Captain America, Namor, and the original Torch one more time, but I suspect if he had and lesser talents had been involved with that revival, it would've gone the way of the 1950s "big three" revival:  an aborted last gasp instead of the start of a new era.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Matt Hawes
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 16502
Posted: 10 February 2006 at 10:07am | IP Logged | 12  

Since our posts pretty much echo each others, I assume you were responding to James's post, Gregg?
Back to Top profile | search | www
 

<< Prev Page of 18 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login