Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
Star Trek
Byrne Robotics > Star Trek Page of 3 Next >>
Topic: STAR TREK: INSURRECTION (1998) - 20 years! Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Shaun Barry
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 08 December 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 6142
Posted: 09 December 2018 at 6:28pm | IP Logged | 1 post reply


So at the time, this was the first TREK film that I purposely avoided in the theaters... I was burned-out on almost all things STAR TREK after the initial airings of "Voyager" (though I did see and enjoy FIRST CONTACT after that), but from the trailers and early reviews, this one held no interest to me.

I did eventually rent it a couple years later, and even purchased a copy a few years after that.  I tend to teeter back & forth between thinking it's just okay, to thinking it's one of the worst TREK entries.

Now, I do think it's the second-worst of the TNG films (the big stinker will always be NEMESIS), but has time been maybe somewhat kinder to INSURRECTION over the years?  The humor still feels shoehorned-in, and R'Afu has got to be the lamest TREK film-villain ever, but it does have a decent, well-intentioned story at its core, the special effects have a nice, atypical painterly quality (ILM did not handle the FX this time around), and it features what I feel is Jerry Goldsmith's second-best TREK film score (after THE MOTION PICTURE).

And:  Measured against the dire Abramsverse flicks, it certainly seems to at least attempt to wear some good, old-fashioned TREK ideals and morals on its sleeve, as opposed to the three dumb-as-a-bag-of-rocks entries from '09, '13 and '16, which feel like they were trying to carpetbomb everything that was good and decent about the original series.

So, thoughts?  Underrated; even worse than its reputation; or maybe just a mediocre, not-unpleasant 2-hour time-waster?





Edited by Shaun Barry on 09 December 2018 at 6:31pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Greg Kirkman
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 May 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 15618
Posted: 09 December 2018 at 6:42pm | IP Logged | 2 post reply

I did an in-depth review of this one during my TNG rewatch, some months ago.

To summarize, this one suffers mostly because it feels like a bloated TV episode rather than a MOVIE. Its heart is in the right place, but its lack of "oomph" is what sinks it.

I'll go with "mediocre, not-unpleasant, two-hour time-waster".
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
James Woodcock
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 September 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4995
Posted: 10 December 2018 at 9:36am | IP Logged | 3 post reply

This was my 'Let's try this cinema to see if it is worthy to watch Episode 1 in' movie.

I remember leaving disappointed with the film but not the cinema - both times!
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Tim O Neill
Byrne Robotics Security


Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 9799
Posted: 10 December 2018 at 9:59am | IP Logged | 4 post reply



This movie has grown on me over time - it wasn’t great in the theater, but I have enjoyed catching it on cable when it comes up.  



Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Imaginary X-Man

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 116477
Posted: 10 December 2018 at 10:50am | IP Logged | 5 post reply

The Federation as the bad guys. Barf.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Jim Muir
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 26 June 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1229
Posted: 10 December 2018 at 10:56am | IP Logged | 6 post reply

<< it feels like a bloated TV episode rather than a
MOVIE. >>

Spot on. Not only that, they shamelessly lifted elements
from old TNG stories to create something much less the
sum of its parts. It's always fun catching up on the
characters, but the story was just so pedestrian and
unengaging I don't think I could tell you much about it
even now.

Still, on the plus side - it didn't have any dune buggy
chases.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Greg Kirkman
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 May 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 15618
Posted: 10 December 2018 at 2:54pm | IP Logged | 7 post reply

The Federation as the bad guys. Barf.
++++++++

And it's only gotten worse, since then!
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Brian Hague
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 14 November 2006
Posts: 8270
Posted: 10 December 2018 at 10:03pm | IP Logged | 8 post reply

I remember the episode (and it is an episode rather than a film) as an exercise in the kind of bone-headed thinking TNG adored. The film is supposed to be about the Prime Directive (The only directive. Starfleet has no others. Not a single one.) Yet the civilization is one that knows about warp technology and simply eschews its use. Well, not their kids, tooling around in their hotrods, causing trouble, and ripping off Brazil for their facelifts, but Mom and Dad at home? Yeah, thanks for the warp drive but no thanks. We'd rather live here on this enormous piece of wooden playground equipment the designers inexplicably thought was worth the price of constructing and call it a city. All forty-five of us. And we're counting on the Federation to protect all forty-five of us on our playground equipment civilization.

So... the Prime Directive has ab-so-lutely NOTHING whatsoever to do with this situation. As quoted in the original series, it prohibits the disruption of planet-wide civilizations by superior technological powers who might disrupt their natural development. The Bakuans or whoever they were from Insurrection were long past that point. What Insurrection represented was TNG's thumb-up-the-butt insistence that our heroes do nothing for anyone at any time under any circumstances since we'll mess everything up in ways we can't presently understand if we intercede ever. This is our wisdom, for we are wise enough to know that wisdom is the wisdom of knowing when to be wise. Shakespeare, Shakespeare, Shakespeare, T.S. Eliot, Mr. Data prepare to leave orbit, and someone turn that damned noise of the suffering and the dying. We are too wise to listen to them.

Also, the film is badly conceived and even more poorly edited. There was supposed to be a kiss between Picard and the woman who he's throwing over his career for, but the producers, rather late in the game one would think, cut it from the film because Picard shouldn't be so... y'know, familiar with someone he's in love with. Which is great. If discovered at the script stage. As it is, Stewart and his co-star thought that moment was going to be in the film and played it as if they were going to kiss. And did. And so the scene as it appears looks as if the film broke and the projectionist lost about ten feet of footage repairing it. Good job, film.

Am I done yet? No. Anthony Zerbe. Who puts this guy in charge of anything and doesn't expect him to Snidely Whiplash his authority all over everyone in his exercise of it? "Sorry, Planet of the Eternally Young and the Useless, but you MUST PAY THE RENT!!" (cue ominous music) "No, no, no!! But I do not have the rent!" "YOU MUST PAY THE RENT!!" (Zerbe advances and the music rises) "Oh, will no one save me??" as Zerbe and her wrinkly old nitwit kids tie her to the railroad tracks as the piano tinkles on at an ever increasing pace... This film was F. Murray Abraham's Jaws 3. Playing opposite Anthony Zerbe? I mean, really, who does that?

And yeah, the Federation are the villains. Because of course they are. Never mind that the creators of Star Trek knew never to go down that unrewarding rabbit hole. Bruce Geller has written about how every week they'd look through submissions from writers who wanted to do Mission: Impossible and every week the same "twist" would occur in script after script. The voice on the tape had LIED and was in on it! The whole time! Dunh dunh dunh...! Sometimes it was just the guy recording the tape. Sometimes it was the organization. In any case, the big surprise...? Is never a big surprise. 

Same with this wreck of an episode. Starfleet prioritizing the health and medical benefits of eternal youth over the wants and needs of a forty-five person strong civilization and forcefully evacuating them from the happily (if potentially toxically) over-varnished jungle gym on which they live. Gasp in astonishment as the entire population (45) is ruthlessly and mercilessly cut down one by one by... transporter beams... which take them someplace else... So the running and rushing about in the big action sequence is literally about... nothing and no one getting hurt. 

Wow. Exciting stuff. But just about at regular TNG levels.

This is also the film with Data's intensely stupid Gilbert and Sullivan resolution to having been re-programmed to go mad and kill everyone, right? Because if Data were to go mad and try to kill everyone, the only solution in a TNG context would be something as supercilious and twee as Gilbert and Sullivan... 

It's a wacky ol' TNG world out there in this film, friends, and you all are welcome to it. I saw it once in the theater when it came out, and I am not revisiting the damned thing ever again.


Edited by Brian Hague on 10 December 2018 at 10:10pm
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Greg Kirkman
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 May 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 15618
Posted: 11 December 2018 at 1:24am | IP Logged | 9 post reply

If they could bottle Brian up and market him as Weaponized Liquid Sarcasm, they would call it “Hagueorade”.

I bow to your talent, sir.
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Eric Sofer
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 31 January 2014
Location: United States
Posts: 3065
Posted: 11 December 2018 at 12:26pm | IP Logged | 10 post reply

Brian, I... I... I am awed, sir. I have so little to add to your observations and criticism. 

Not that I'll remain silent.

ITEM: Sarcasm free first. If Starfleet is so goddamned desperate to find a world with healing for ANYTHING... why not colonize Omicron Ceti III? "We'll never get sick, and we'll never die." Crap, you want to help out an already populated world? We KNOW those plants could survive off OCIII - that's how they got Kirk! And the question, "But how do we break them of the spell of the plants once we take them away?" contains its own answer - take them away from OCIII ought to piss 'em off enough.

ITEM: Time for sarcasm. The tension of the showdown in "Spectre of the Gun" was far more logical than the showdown at the end of "Insurrection." Let's get this quite right... the command crew of the Enterprise-D was FACING DOWN A GROUP OF DRONES??? And to make it tense... THE DRONES FACED THEM DOWN IN RETURN???  Wow, did that director know how to set up a face-off or what?

ITEM: So Picard figures to go back to the Baku on his own. With no backup plan, and no way to let Starfleet know the problem. Okay, for Donna Murphy, I might do it.

But then he is ambushed by the command crew. (All being renewed and being healthier and smarter than ever... yeah, whatever.) THIS event causes him to take a slightly wiser course... let Starfleet know what the hell is going on. Oops, bad radio conditions, so the Enterprise has gotta run to get free of the interference because THERE'S A TIME LIMIT. (Do remember that fact.)

How shall we handle this?
A) Send down a full complement of whatever "marines" are on the Enterprise, led by Commander Worf and Mr. Data, supervised by Picard from the safety of the biggest, toughest shuttle they have while the Enterprise runs at top warp speed (and to hell with the speed limit - at least that makes sense) to get to radio clearance, while launch message buoys as backup, to ensure that at least SOME message gets through.
B) Send a away team with a heavy security contingent, and a medical team and a fully supplied engineering team to support the away team while the Enterprise as above, blah, blah, blah.
C) Send FIVE PEOPLE to go get more information and try to TALK THE ADMIRAL OUT OF IT. Because, again, with time running out, that's the fastest and most efficient ...way... to handle it?

ITEM: Oh no, the unreasonably stupid kid lost his... caterpillar. Send a couple of security men back to find him - oops, no security. Okay, send the counselor to find him - no, wait, she's not a big enough screen person, and won't be dramatic at all. Besides... is she even in this movie? Are you sure? Has she contributed* anything? Oh, I got it - Send THE CAPTAIN back to get him.

One of TNG's biggest problems is that they seemed to continually insult my intelligence... and were so successful at it. This movie is even more so. (Although I will never, ever, ever forgive...
Data: That was....?
Geordi: NOT funny.)

*CONTRIBUTED - not appeared and blathered bullshit. And I do not blame Marina Sirtis in the least for this.


Edited by Eric Sofer on 11 December 2018 at 12:29pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Tyler Kloster
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 25 November 2006
Posts: 167
Posted: 11 December 2018 at 2:23pm | IP Logged | 11 post reply

I'll just repost what I said about the film in Mr. Kirkman's TNG rewatch thread:

"INSURRECTION is, to me, the most boring of all the Trek films...not the worst, but the most boring, which is weird since it came from one of the show's best writers. Aside from the music and the special effects (which are mostly better than the series but somehow a comedown from FIRST CONTACT two years earlier) it really is like watching a 2-part episode of the series, and not one of the better ones.

I believe that at a mere 103 minutes, INSURRECTION is the shortest of all the Trek films, and if you trimmed the lengthy end credits off of that, it would pretty much be exactly the length of a 2-part TNG episode. 

Heck, the opening scene with Data going rogue feels like an episode teaser, and on the rare occasions I watch this one, it always feels like the screen is about to fade to black and the TNG theme sequence will start."

That said...20 years? Already? Wow, I'm old.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Brian Hague
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 14 November 2006
Posts: 8270
Posted: 11 December 2018 at 5:08pm | IP Logged | 12 post reply

Greg, Eric, thank you both. You're much too kind. The secret is really just to let everything bother you all the time.

Eric, I like the Omicron Ceti III concept, but the flowers kept bringing everyone back to the planet because, while they can survive for a limited time away from their world, they thrive on the Berthold Rays that blanket the planet and otherwise kill all living tissue. If you wanted to mass-merchandize the health benefits of D.O.C.T.O.R. T. (Dicot Omicron Ceti Three Optimal Rejuvenation Therapy, TM, pat. pend.), you'd need to constantly bombard the flowers and the patients you're trying to help with intense, deadly radiation, which, who knows, depending on how you feel about patients may be right up your alley. I know I'm annoying whenever I'm a patient. I imagine a great many health care professionals would have been more than happy to open up a canister of Berthold Rays on my ungrateful ass...

For only a little extra cash, you can also sign up for Kironide treatments and gain psychokinetic powers whenever you feel like it. Fun at parties. Fool your friends. Hey, why is Bob taking a whip to Margaret? And why is Paul using a flaming hot poker on Marti? Only you know the secret! 

Enjoy your new health and powers on a time-travel trip back to whatever era you wish. Now that we have the correct solutions for the antimatter intermix formula and slingshot maneuvers around the sun, any era you wish to visit is just around the corner! No parent or Guardian required! 

If you really wanted to run wild, you could try cross-breeding the Omicron Ceti III flowers with the Kironide fruit... Maybe you'd wind up with those deadly flower things that shotgun their pointed seeds into the chests of careless Vulcans. 

Someone should really (not) do a series called "Star Trek: Ramifications" in which what is learned and brought back by Starfleet crews from the edge of the cosmos is implemented here in the more civilized and centralized planets, causing everyone no end of mischief. 

Honestly, though, Eric, you do bring up some points I hadn't thought to complain about myself. Well observed, sir. And Greg, what can I say? Haguers gonna Hague, am I right? :-)


Edited by Brian Hague on 11 December 2018 at 5:13pm
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 

Page of 3 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login