Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
Movies
Byrne Robotics > Movies << Prev Page of 13 Next >>
Topic: Updated: James Gunn Rehired for GotG Vol 3 Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Thomas Woods
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 09 June 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 1356
Posted: 23 July 2018 at 6:41pm | IP Logged | 1 post reply

So when Disney acquires Fox, would you demand that
they fire Seth MacFarlane over the Herbert character
on FAMILY GUY?

---

I haven't demanded anything, Disney made their choice
on their own. But I do agree with it.

I have not heard the Family Guy jokes, so can't say.
But it surely has a lot more context and story to it.
And a cartoon joke is far from a guy saying "I like
this". Usually a comedian will make the joke about
someone else in a story, like Luis CK did a pedophile
joke about a man in his neighborhood and he never got
too explicit and made sure to condemn it ... far
different than saying "I was being a pedophile in my
neighborhood one day and.."

What CK DID joke about himself a lot, played a role in
what he was really into.

Edited by Thomas Woods on 23 July 2018 at 6:48pm
Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Michael Roberts
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 20 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 12769
Posted: 23 July 2018 at 6:51pm | IP Logged | 2 post reply

I have seen and heard comments that it is no worse than the Trump "grab them by the pu**y" recording. In my view both men were thinking they were being funny and provocative and neither acted on the crude comments.

óó

Trump didnít sound like he was trying to be funny. He sounded like he was bragging. Iíve /personally/ experienced Trumpís entitlement and lack of respect for peopleís personal space. He shoved me out of his way because I happened to be in his way, despite no one else being around us for at least 10-15 feet. 
Back to Top profile | search
 
Matt Reed
Byrne Robotics Security
Avatar
Robotmod

Joined: 16 April 2004
Posts: 33009
Posted: 23 July 2018 at 7:43pm | IP Logged | 3 post reply

First off, Trump was bragging.  He did what he says he did.  He didn't say what he did to get a laugh but never actually tried to do it. Second, I'm sure you've listened to the whole ACCESS HOLLYWOOD sound.  That's not a man trying to entertain a crowd.  That's a man thinking he was off-mic bragging to Billy Bush about what he, a man of entitlement and means, can do to any woman he wants.  That's far different from Gunn making crude jokes to provoke who, nonetheless, is not a pedophile. Big difference. 
Back to Top profile | search
 
Christopher Frost
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 24 October 2016
Location: Canada
Posts: 324
Posted: 23 July 2018 at 8:05pm | IP Logged | 4 post reply

" In today's age of outrage Disney had few options."

I fully disagree. They could have chosen to make a stand and dismiss the claims. Until people and companies start to push back against the culture of outrage, it's never going to stop. If they keep giving into those who claim to be outraged at every turn, that mentality is going to continue and get worse as they are getting their way. We have reached a point as a society where even an allegation of impropriety is enough to destroy a persons life and where stupid things you said a decade ago can be used against you. Where does it go from here? How far is too far? The only way to stop it is to fight back against it and a big company like Disney could have led the charge instead of capitulating.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Steve De Young
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 01 April 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 3254
Posted: 23 July 2018 at 8:07pm | IP Logged | 5 post reply

Matt hit the nail on the head.  If Gunn committed criminal acts against children ever in his life, he should be in prison and a social pariah.  Thereís not even an accusation f that.  But frankly thereís literally nothing he could have said 10 years ago that I think should make him unemployable today.

Does anybody really want to live in a world where people who make a stupid drunk tweet in their youth become unemployable for life?  Do you want to live in a world where no one can ever repent and change?
Back to Top profile | search
 
Thomas Woods
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 09 June 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 1356
Posted: 23 July 2018 at 8:18pm | IP Logged | 6 post reply

Does anybody really want to live in a world where
people who make a stupid drunk tweet in their youth
become unemployable for life? Do you want to live in
a world where no one can ever repent and change?

---

That is all kinds of misleading downplaying. Youth: he
was in his 40's. Drunk: did he say that somewhere?
Stupid: he is smart. Tweet (singular): There were MANY
tweets. Was he drunk and stupid every time. Seems like
excuses.

We do live in a world of repent and change, and it
could be true that he has done that. If there is no
investigation or accusations in the coming weeks, he
will be employed again. I am pretty sure of that.
Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Steve De Young
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 01 April 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 3254
Posted: 23 July 2018 at 9:47pm | IP Logged | 7 post reply

Where did I say that any of that was describing Gunn?  And what are you talking about investigation?  These are tweets from over a decade ago that he deleted.

You are really really confident that nothing you're saying today, or have said in the past, will ever be considered objectionable in a future time.  Are you willing to take that gamble?  Have you held the opinions that will be considered correct a decade from now since birth?

Before you answer, you should probably be aware that I can screenshot you in another thread, Mr. Woods, posting a video by Stefan Molyneux, whom I can pretty quickly demonstrate to be a misogynist and racist by today's standards, let alone those of a decade from now.  Ready to lose your job?


Edited by Steve De Young on 23 July 2018 at 9:48pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Joe Zhang
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 12125
Posted: 23 July 2018 at 9:50pm | IP Logged | 8 post reply

Gunn has a talent for communicating authentic, raw emotion through the silver screen. That talent makes the difference between a satisfying movie and a $100 million dollar waste of time. Maybe he honed that talent by lobbing sick comments on Twitter, to better understand how to push people's buttons. Those comments will make him unemployable for a while, and understandably so, but not for too long. 

Edited by Joe Zhang on 23 July 2018 at 9:51pm
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Thomas Woods
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 09 June 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 1356
Posted: 23 July 2018 at 9:58pm | IP Logged | 9 post reply

Where did I say that any of that was describing Gunn?

---

I guess you were not, but since we are talking about
him, I felt you were describing him. So if you were not,
that is not what happened with him.


Stefan Molyneux - why don't you try to take him down,
everything he says is still there.
Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Steve De Young
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 01 April 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 3254
Posted: 23 July 2018 at 10:10pm | IP Logged | 10 post reply

I don't have to 'try to take down' an alt-right figure.  My question to you was intended to point out what I believe to be your hypocrisy.  You believe that Gunn should have been fired because 10 years ago he said things that were objectionable.  I'm not disputing that they were objectionable.

I'm asking you, if someone next week, or 12 years from now, goes to your employer and says, "This guy is reposting stuff from Molyneux, and here's why I find him objectionable", and your employer finds it objectionable and fires you, will you meekly walk away from your job and have no problem with it?

I believe you are living in a glass house and throwing rocks.  You have, recently, posted things on this forum that other people find objectionable.  Yet when someone else makes objectionable social media comments, you support their firing.  I think you should rethink, and take a more consistent stance.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Thomas Woods
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 09 June 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 1356
Posted: 23 July 2018 at 10:17pm | IP Logged | 11 post reply

I'm asking you, if someone next week, or 12 years from
now, goes to your employer and says, "This guy is
reposting stuff from Molyneux, and here's why I find
him objectionable", and your employer finds it
objectionable and fires you, will you meekly walk away
from your job and have no problem with it?

I believe you are living in a glass house and throwing
rocks. You have, recently, posted things on this
forum that other people find objectionable. Yet when
someone else makes objectionable social media
comments, you support their firing. I think you
should rethink, and take a more consistent stance.

---

Sure I would hate that happening to me. Edit: And I
have said and done things years ago that I regret and
have changed over time, as I said above, Gunn may have
done that too.

If people find things I say objectionable, they
usually say so, and argue otherwise. That I am fine
with. That is what I do when I see someone else's post
I don't like. I don't threaten them.

Edited by Thomas Woods on 23 July 2018 at 10:28pm
Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Benny Hasa
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 January 2011
Posts: 712
Posted: 23 July 2018 at 10:37pm | IP Logged | 12 post reply

The man said things ten years ago, apologized for them and deleted them and was soon hired by Disney.  

The guy made films on redemption, and because he decides to say a few things about Trump, so nut job uncovers his past tweets.  Sure, they weren't funny and in horrible taste, but they were simply inappropriate jokes. Get over it. 

Disney should have taken a stand, and held its ground instead of giving in.  There seems to be more outrage in their decision than rejoicing. They wanted to protect their image? From what I can tell, they hurt their image far more than they would have imagined. I think it was a cowardly move and I'm a huge Disney fan.  This is the first time I find myself embarrassed to be such a fan. 
Back to Top profile | search
 

<< Prev Page of 13 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login