Posted: February 22 2018 at 4:28am | IP Logged | 8
|
post reply
|
|
Eric Sofer wrote:
But when they present a situation where they end a series to start a new one - yet another #1 - it's a sign that indicates, "This storyline and character are done", and a reader can then infer, "Ah, good. It's done. Now that I look at it, I don't know why I paid four bucks an issue for the past two years... but I don't have to any more. No more story to keep up with!" |
|
|
Excellent point, Mr Sofer.
I've been buying classic Hulk comics via comiXology. Most recent one was HULK #199.
Now, there is an arc of sorts (which is fine). There's a standalone tale in each issue, but the overall arc of Gamma Base pursuing Hulk (along with Samson) is there. I am enjoying them. But because I have a limited budget, and do want to try other things, when the arc ends for good, I will stop buying Hulk comics and perhaps pick up some classic DAREDEVIL or THOR.
Yes, that's not quite like what you described, but has the industry considered jumping-off points? Some may buy out of habit, but if there is a #1, then they may think, 'Okay, time to jump off.' They may not if they are really enjoying the title, but if they only have a mild interest, or seek to buy other titles, these constant relaunches may be an incentive for them to jump off.
It's not quite the same, but it can be like that with films. Although there's an overall arc in SAW I-VII, the first three films are a trilogy (of sorts), and I did know someone who used that as an excuse to jump off. Not quite the same as comics, but just food for thought.
|