Posted: 15 September 2017 at 3:09pm | IP Logged | 3
|
post reply
|
|
Joe, it's slightly reminiscent of Captain Mar-vel's second costume as well.
Marvelman... Captain Marvel... they really ARE out of ideas, aren't they? Why is the company that professes diversity so anxious to DE-diversify (deverisfy?) an established female character? I realize that pre-whatever-the-hell-crossover brought about this costume that some artists were being overly generous to Ms. Marvel... so one could certainly hypersexualization,.
And lest you younger viewers and other children forget, she was MS. Marvel because "Ms." was a statement of female independence back in the 70s. Today it's just a joke, but when Ms. Marvel was introduced, she was intended to shake up the male status quo (along with Spider-Woman, She-Hulk*... yeah, there's a trend there.)
Now, if I understand correctly, Ms. Marvel is a teen-aged Muslim girl with entirely different powers? No doubt so named because they have to cash in on SOMETHING, and a new character likely would sell like rubber biscuits at the Donner Party family reunion picnic.
And anyone who is hypersexualizing an adolescent Muslim girl has far worse problems than comics. Not that comics are a problem, but I think you see my point.
Oh, and one last observation... short hair on a woman probably means lesbianism about as strongly as long hair on a man. And everyone knows that Jesus fellow was gay. (Referencing a totally different topic, but... as long as it was laying there...)
*Say, are Jessica and Jen still referred to as Spider-Woman and She-Hulk? I couldn't be surprised if they're not.
|